Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The science of climate change is anything but settled
Washington Times ^ | Mar 13, 2019 | Roy W Spencer

Posted on 03/16/2019 8:01:49 AM PDT by centurion316

On March 5, 58 senior military and national security leaders sent a letter to President Trump denouncing his plan to form a National Security Council panel to take a critical look at the science underpinning climate change claims. Their objections to such a Red Team effort were basically that the “science is settled.”

But if the science is settled, what are they afraid of? Wouldn’t a review of the science come to the same conclusion as the supposed consensus of climate scientists?

The letter claimed, “Climate change is real, it is happening now, it is driven by humans, and it is accelerating.”

While climate change is indeed real, it is not at all obvious how much humans have to do with it. Even the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) admits this, saying only that over half of warming since the 1950s is believed to be human-caused. So, “driven by humans” is an exaggeration, even by the IPCC’s rather alarmist standards.

The additional claim that climate change is “accelerating” can also be challenged. In recent decades, warming actually decelerated, and there is a growing gap between climate model forecasts and measured global temperatures.

In fact, a peer-reviewed paper published last year in the prestigious Journal of Climate found that the observed level of global warming since the late 1800s, including the deep oceans, was consistent with a climate system only half as sensitive as are the climate models guiding U.S. energy and national security policy.

And even that study assumed that all of the warming was human-caused. If recent warming is only half anthropogenic, then the global warming problem is only one-fourth as bad as the public is being told.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climate; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; sciencetrust; settledscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Dr. Roy Spencer has consistently used facts and observation data to form his opinions about climate change. That is remarkably unusual in the political scam known as Climate Change, AKA Global Warming. He is the world's expert on satellite sensors of the Earth's temperates. He has the facts and can defend his data. This is a real contrast with those who have been manipulating ground temperature measurements to support their political agenda. He is not popular among the climate grifters.

Unfortunately we see that the grifters are often believed, in this case a story about military and foreign policy wonks who know nothing about climate science but are willing to accept this nonsense as fact.

When educated people are willing to distort and ignore facts that don't conform to their political fantasies, civilization cannot long survive. The new age of the Druids is here.

1 posted on 03/16/2019 8:01:49 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Just like the weather sometimes, climate change is unsettled.


2 posted on 03/16/2019 8:08:41 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

That’s why they call them “theories”.


3 posted on 03/16/2019 8:11:23 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Never ever accept the lefts premise as the starting point for a discussion!


4 posted on 03/16/2019 8:12:14 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

“58 senior military and national security leaders sent a letter to President Trump”

fire or dismiss every one of these deluded traitors.


5 posted on 03/16/2019 8:15:26 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Geologist Ian Palmer : “Climate change is a natural phenomenon. It has been going on for millions of years.”

Physicist Thomas Sheahan: “The science is NOT settled at all and it would be a great disservice to children to indoctrinate them with one currently-fashionable theory.

Dr. Will Happer, Princeton University Physicist and appointed to set up the Presidential Committee on Climate Change : “You should not let yourself be deceived by those who claim you are opposing “science”. Science has been badly hurt by the global warming cult.”

UNIPCC Tom Tripp: “Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that climate change is a problem.”

35 Year Senior Research Scientist for NASA Dr.Leonard Weinstein: “Any reasonable scientific analysis must conclude that the basic theory is wrong. The Earth will always heal itself. Climate is beyond our power to control. Earth doesn’t care about governments or legislation. You can find much actual global warming in present-day observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something the earth routinely does on its own.”

Nobel Prize for Physics winner Dr. Robert B. Laughlin and a Research Scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: The jig is up. The whole thing is a fraud. Perhaps what has doomed the Climategate fraudsters the most was their brazenness in fudging the data.”

Even the Russians are waking up to the lies of climate change. The head of the geomagnetic laboratory of the Russian Academy of Sciences has said: “Hundreds of billions of dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing an Anthropogenic Global Warming theory that is not supported by physical world evidence. AGW has been forcefully imposed by a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins in elementary school textbooks.

Research Chemist William C. Gilbert: “The dysfunctional nature of the climate sciences is nothing short of a scandal. Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the climate science community. The global warming establishment has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the IPCC”

Atmospheric Physicist Dr, John Reed who has worked with Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization: “We maintain there is no reason whatsoever to worry about man-made climate change because there is no valid evidence that such a thing is happening.”

Climate Statistics Professor Dr. Caleb Rossiter of American University and an Obama Liberal in every sense of the word is now being shunned by the Democrat Party for being a climate skeptic. Once his climate skepticism becomes news in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in May 2014, he was terminated from his fellowship at the liberal Institute for Policy Studies after 23  years. He called the Nobel given to Al Gore the worst Nobel Prize since Henry Kissinger. Al Gore, along with Obama vilified people who disagreed on climate change and took steps like those against Dr. Rossiter to ruin lives and assure that publications would not publish and disagreement with those in power. Dr. Rossiter explained that Al Gore was supported by the progressive socialists in the party because they want to move away from an industrial society to a post-industrial, non-fossil fuel, post corporate society.It has been made clear that those pushing the false science of climate change from Congress to corporations will continue to maintain a zero tolerance policy in regards to climate skeptics. They will not debate nor even recognize that there may be those who read real facts concerning climate change and have a different point of view.


6 posted on 03/16/2019 8:16:18 AM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

What , Obama was Lying ?


7 posted on 03/16/2019 8:17:28 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Ha!

Man caused climate change is just as real as Trump's Russian collusion.

8 posted on 03/16/2019 8:20:04 AM PDT by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Drag a billion dollars through a corrupt University and you'll find 'believers'... lots of 'em.
9 posted on 03/16/2019 8:27:17 AM PDT by GOPJ (More than 49 people murdered by illegals in the US where's the press outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

If you actually listen to any of these retard global warming folks what they are actually talking about isn’t global warming at all but “overpopulation”. How in the world getting white people to reduce their birth rates even further is going to do a damn thing about the globe’s population is just maximal retardation. But “This is America in 2019.”


10 posted on 03/16/2019 8:33:52 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Exactly. There is no such thing as the “science of climate change”. That is an artifice created by democrats to gain control of the economy and ultimately people’s everyday lives and liberty.


11 posted on 03/16/2019 8:36:17 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


12 posted on 03/16/2019 8:47:46 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Silly human. It is not about controlling the Sun, it is about controlling you! Specifically controlling your money!


13 posted on 03/16/2019 8:49:50 AM PDT by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: centurion316; All
"Their objections to such a Red Team effort were basically that the “science is settled.”"

As a side note to this thread, please consider the following.

The idea that politically correct “global warming” is settled science is same mentality imo that politically correct, vote-winning case precedent on which the murder of unborn children is based somehow trumps the fact that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect so-called “right” to have an abortion like the Founding States did with the rights expressly protected in the Bill of Rights.

14 posted on 03/16/2019 8:56:47 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Perhaps not a good analogy. The Bill of Rights was enacted as a restraint on government. No one could conceive that the government would permit or direct abortions. This was the era of Orphans Courts that were established to determine the paternity of illegitimate children. Those fathers were required to provide support for those children so that the government did not have that burden.


15 posted on 03/16/2019 9:05:41 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Thank you Washington Times!

I enjoy tracking the daily weather, in Omyakon Russia, the coldest inhabited place on earth. Early in march Omyakon broke out of their negative 50 degree days and experienced a warming trend.

The very day this happened a weather channel "meteorologist" lectured his audience on why not to associate North America's cold winter with the climate change argument. The "meteorologist" then broke out a map of Asia (Siberia) that showed how much warmer they were than the average..then said look how warm the rest of the world is. They waited until the first warm day in Siberia to start lecturing us....not a peep the previous three months of -50.

That day I also learned from CNN that the job of meteorologists was not to report the weather but to also educate the viewers on climate change.

Later that same day I learned Congress was introducing a bill to ban federal money for anti climate change research.

THE BIG LIE

16 posted on 03/16/2019 9:23:23 AM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

In the 70s, we were told we were in a mini ice age. I never saw an iceberg floating down Main Street.


17 posted on 03/16/2019 9:31:14 AM PDT by bgill (New tagline - Judging someone by their weight is hating on their character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

I saw a Drudge headline a couple of days ago saying that scientists have invented a time machine that “defies the laws of physics”. Whatever stupid journalist wrote that doesn’t realize that it violates (if real) the CURRENT THEORIES of physics. Modern liberal journalists - know nothing, do nothing parasites on humanity.


18 posted on 03/16/2019 9:38:32 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Break it off in 'em, Brett. They've earned it, and you've earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I’ll bet it is a lot closer to the 100 bucks through the trailer court than the billion thru a corrupt U. Corruption isn’t nearly that discriminatory.


19 posted on 03/16/2019 9:39:35 AM PDT by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bgill

One of my professors when I was in Graduate School was one of the gurus of Global Cooling and was building one of the first Global Circulation Models from where we get all predictions of future climate. He later claimed that he has misunderestimated some of his algorithms and he “discovered” that rather than Global Cooling we were facing Global Warming.

Peddling Global Warming was much more lucrative than preaching glaciers in the swimming pool. Smart man, Stephen Schneider. BTW, like most climate scientists, he was neither a climatologist or a scientist. He was a mechanical engineer.


20 posted on 03/16/2019 9:46:39 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson