Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

We did that in high school chemistry.


2 posted on 03/16/2019 4:47:17 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Schumer delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Not at 15% efficiency you didn’t. ;-)

Direct to electric solar tops out in the low 20%’s in anything affordable and electric storage is impractical. Electrolysis is horribly inefficient. 15% direct to hydrogen is orders of magnitude more efficient than solar>electrolysis>H conversion. You will note that I did not say run your car on it. I said HVAC and water heat. If these panels are realistically priced would you not like to see a 60% drop in electric/gas bills?


7 posted on 03/16/2019 4:55:29 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Yep. Electrolysis of water is still the same whether a generator at the power plant makes the electricity or a solar panel does.

And it sure is funny that a volume of hydrogen is given here but not the pressure thereof, so no way to figure out just how many moles of hydrogen were generated.


13 posted on 03/16/2019 5:06:09 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson