To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Yep. Electrolysis of water is still the same whether a generator at the power plant makes the electricity or a solar panel does.
And it sure is funny that a volume of hydrogen is given here but not the pressure thereof, so no way to figure out just how many moles of hydrogen were generated.
13 posted on
03/16/2019 5:06:09 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Olog-hai
I think it would be safe to assume that it is at 1 atmosphere, ie. uncompressed.
20 posted on
03/16/2019 5:15:59 AM PDT by
LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
(TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
To: Olog-hai
They aren’t doing electrolysis.
23 posted on
03/16/2019 5:19:58 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(The Democrat Party is a criminal organization.)
To: Olog-hai
If they don’t specify the pressure of the hydrogen then you can safely assume they are talking about 1ATM, or ambient pressure. We aren’t talking about liquid hydrogen for sure, so storage pressure would probably be closer to natural gas.
91 posted on
03/16/2019 7:31:30 AM PDT by
Tallguy
To: Olog-hai
And it sure is funny that a volume of hydrogen is given here but not the pressure thereof, so no way to figure out just how many moles of hydrogen were generated. If not otherwise specified, always assume they are talking about uncompressed hydrogen, which would maximize their "gallons of hydrogen" figure. Negligible energy density.
95 posted on
03/16/2019 7:34:23 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson