Posted on 03/12/2019 7:33:57 PM PDT by CaptainK
Several Democratic donors were among those charged Tuesday in a federal crackdown on a nationwide fraudulent college admissions conspiracy.
"Dozens of individuals involved in a nationwide conspiracy that facilitated cheating on college entrance exams and the admission of students to elite universities as purported athletic recruits," according to the Department of Justice. Documents unsealed Tuesday in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts show fraud extending to Yale, Georgetown, and other American universities.
.....Of the 50 people charged in the college scandal, the Washington Free Beacon found only one gave consistently to Republican candidates. Mossimo G. Giannulli, founder of the clothing company Mossimo, Inc., is married to actress Lori Loughlin. He and his wife gave over $500,000 to secure admission to USC for his two daughters via the crew team. Neither daughter rows. He supported Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) in 2016, and Romney and John Boehner before that. He has also donated to Democrats.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
The super wealthy give large donations directly to the universities for favored consideration. The difference this time is the bribes went to a third party instead of directly to the university. Bribes disguised as donations to sham charities? The Clintons can tell you all about that.
If I were a diehard Democrat and wanted them to win, I’d give money to Rubio, Romney and Boehner too.
If so; then never.
Only liberals will be dumb enough to commit a felony just to have what should be a felony (Academic misconduct/fraud) perpetrated upon themselves!
I m aware of the climates all ver sphere Cal, Arizona up to Utah, NM, texas. This is not about where we lived decades ago.
200 years ago LA climate was med climate especially the LA basin and down the coast. The basin is protected from the high and east deserts by the mountains. There were ponds. forests and the rivers flowed freely.
That’s not true anymore. No natural ponds, forests the population booms have destroyed much of the med environment.
While the temperature is more moderate than Palmdale and Riverside, it has many characteristics of the desert.
I believe Santa Barbara is a Med Climate
PS I don’t mind little debate/argument with someone with a well thought out POV.
My 65. BTW I am that local. When your wife’s throat is so dry at night she wakes up 2-3 times for water and you move right to the beach, you pay attention to the climate.
“When your wifes throat is so dry at night she wakes up 2-3 times for water and you move right to the beach, you pay attention to the climate.”
I suggest you alert the profs at Cal Tech that you’ve devised a new test to define climate classification. That one’s a doozy.
That may change the environment like you claim but it does not alter the climate.
Verbatim from Wikipedia: "....The Climate of Los Angeles....is classified as a Mediterranean climate...."
And you’re not the local I was referring to.
sorry I am the loco
The place was overrun by americans first. By the late 1960s the things I listed had gone away. If we hadn’t taken over other locations water, it would be a desert with about 10% of the people and no san fernando valley.
I was referring to a specific person on this site and you are not that person.
I went back to the LA Times articles including a hundred years ago written by otis Chandler the owner of the paper. He describes what made it a med climate. Those things are gone as i said.
There is a good article by a Cal Poly professor which make your case. I sell RE almost all over SoCal. When i see vacant lots or bare hills, it looks like desert. My last point.
20 million people tearing down forests and draining ponds can change a climate. Not all deserts are scorching hot. North Africa by the sea, for example. Is that desert or med in your understanding. I say desert.
We won’t agree, but thanx for the thoughtful debate.
Trump’s fault — TDS made them do it. It’s for the children, doncha know?!
Its almost like this high profile anti rich power prosecution is a mini learning / training attempt to explain the Clinton foundation before it gets called into the news. People can understand this corruption of power and wealth exempting the powerful from the rules we have follow
I could be just wishing.
btt
I don't think they had that much money. And there were probably a lot of people better positioned to make that deal, and only so many deals to go around.
About a lot of the politicians kids getting into big name schools: if you're in the acceptable range of grades and scores and your parent is a famous politician they agree with, you're in. Even if you don't get into Harvard or Yale, you get into Columbia or Brown. If the college really likes the politician enough, they will even bend the rules for the kid, and if minority status is involved, it's even more of a sure shot.
So whether it's one of the Bushes or Chelsea Clinton or Meghan McCain or one of the Obama children, it's unlikely that any of them resorted to fraud, or even much overt string-pulling of their own to get in. It's another story if you're completely below the acceptable standard and they hate your politician parent.
Lefties. The rules for thee, but not for me.
Note to liberal Hollywood or other rich weenies: If you are not the Putin of your little cabal, youre just cannon fodder. You are useful and expendable. And to non-leftists you wear a STUPID mark on your forehead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.