Posted on 03/09/2019 10:51:30 AM PST by Kaslin
New York Times foreign affairs columnist Thomas Friedman had some choice words for Rep. Ilhan Omar after the recently elected congresswoman has displayed antisemitic rhetoric during her short tenure in Congress via her comments about Israel and big money in politics. Friedman said Rep. Omar had a "perfect" opportunity to be a bridge builder between Muslims and Jews but instead has opted to be a "bridge destroyer" because she has not offered "constructive" criticism.
"Ilhan Omar represents, I believe, the largest Jewish community in the whole upper Midwest...She also represents a Somali immigrant community that have come to our city and enriched it...She was perfectly poised to be a bridge builder between Muslims and Jews, between Arabs and Israelis and rather than that she has come to be a bridge destroyer,” Friedman told the host.
“She was perfectly poised to be a bridge builder between Muslims and Jews, between Arabs and Israelis. ... She has come to be a bridge destroyer,” New York Times columnist Tom Friedman tells @smerconish about Rep. Ilhan Omar’s controversial Israel comments https://t.co/msphDlebuV pic.twitter.com/sqIzxmCEWI— CNN (@CNN) March 9, 2019
Friedman made it known he was not necessarily bashing Omar for criticism of Israel nor foreign policy, but the way in which she went about it.
"Do you want to make a point? Or do you want to make a difference? Do you want to be constructive or destructive?...There are constructive ways to be critical of AIPAC or this administration right now...But when you come in and start throwing around these tropes about dual allegiance, about Israel and jews hypnotizing people, no one is going to believe you're innocent here because you are not being constructive. And when you come from this district that is such a strong Jewish and Muslim population, where you're set up to be a bridge builder and all you do is be a bridge destroyer then you are on my criticism list," Friedman said.
As noted by Matt yesterday, Democratic leadership has opted instead to believe that Rep. Omar is not antisemitic, but simply an idiot who does not understand what she is saying. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi recently dismissed Rep. Omar's remarks, saying, "The incident that happened with, I don't think our colleague is anti-Semitic, I think she has a different experience in the use of words, doesn't understand that some of them are fraught with meaning, that she, what, didn't realize."
This is going to get much worse. University Campus life is going to be a war zone.
Friedman is definitely a fool. But he is a very useful fool for the Dems. He is trying to do damage control as they cannot have Jews rethinking their allegiance to the Dem party.
I am not sure how much of it is wishful thinking, but I am one of those who thinks we may be seeing early signs of a shift in party loyalties buy Jews. The shift is being driven partly by Dems increasingly open connections with anti-semites, and partly by the death of those whose loyalty is due to Truman recognizing Israel, and Roosevelt saving the Jews in WWII (not exactly true, but try telling them that).
A shift from 70% Dem voting to 70% Republican voting in less than 20 years would cause so much trouble for the organized Jewish pressure groups (e.g. ADL) and the press that relies on them for regular denunciations of Republicans as racists.
meanwhile........ the US embassy is in Jerusalem
How will discussions in the Catskills go? Will there be a desertion while on vacation or will the Jews continue to adhere to their ingrained habit?
..................
Sorry Tom is disappointed. She was always a bomb thrower. He just ignored it as long as her positions were veiled.
I agree with a few notable exceptions, like President Reagan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.