Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Promises Executive Order Denying Funds to Anti-Free Speech Universities
Frontpagemagazine ^ | March 4, 2019 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 03/05/2019 1:59:51 AM PST by SJackson

Students must be free to challenge “ridiculous and dangerous ideas,” Trump tells CPAC.

President Trump vowed to issue an executive order protecting free speech at America’s universities Saturday as he invited Hayden Williams, a conservative victim of leftist violence on campus, to share the stage with him at this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference.

“We reject oppressive speech codes, censorship, political correctness and every other attempt by the hard left to stop people from challenging ridiculous and dangerous ideas. These ideas are dangerous,” Trump said March 2 in a speech that was interrupted by chants of “USA! USA! USA!” “Instead we believe in free speech, including online and including on campus.”

“Today I’m proud to announce that I will be very soon signing an executive order requiring colleges and universities to support free speech if they want federal research grants.”

“If they want our dollars, and we give it to them by the billions, they’ve got to allow people like Hayden and many other great young people and old people to speak. Free speech. If they don’t, it will be very costly,” he said. “Every day we’re restoring common sense and the timeless values that unite us all. We believe in the Constitution and the rule of law.”

The president did not provide details about the upcoming executive order. Robby Soave of Reason reports that “an official with knowledge of the executive order confirmed … that a draft exists. Indeed, the plan is to penalize universities that do not protect free speech by taking away their federal grants.”

The announcement came after student leaders from a group of taxpayer-funded universities in Kentucky urged state lawmakers to approve legislation to protect free speech on campus. A letter to lawmakers was signed by 18 student leaders, including representatives of College Republicans, Young Americans for Liberty, and the Council on Post-Secondary Education. “Across the country, speech codes have been used against students of all parts of the political spectrum,” the letter states.

Williams, a field representative for the grassroots conservative training academy, the Arlington, Va.-based Leadership Institute, briefly joined Trump on the dais at CPAC in a National Harbor, Maryland hotel a few miles from the nation’s capital.

“It’s great that I’m being recognized … but there’s so many conservative students across the country who are facing discrimination, harassment, and worse if they dare to speak up on campus,” said Williams, a black eye visible on his face.

“So I’m glad that we could we could bring this to the forefront and I'd just like to say if these socialist progressives had their way they would put our Constitution through the paper shredder in a heartbeat. So it’s as important now [as] ever, the work at Leadership Institute and Campus Reform, exposing these liberal abuses to the public.”

Williams, 26, was coldcocked Feb. 19 when he was allegedly assaulted by Zachary Greenberg, 28, at the University of California, Berkeley.

At the time Williams was assisting the campus chapter of Turning Point USA at that group’s recruiting table. Turning Point strongly backs Trump. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., headlined the group’s event, “AmericaFest,” on the first night of CPAC, Feb. 28.

Although the attack was captured on video, Berkeley officials abruptly dropped an investigation into the assault and then re-opened it under pressure from conservatives who claimed officials weren’t taking the matter seriously because the victim was a conservative activist. Greenberg was arrested March 1 and charged with assault with a deadly weapon and attempting to cause great bodily injury. His bail was set at $30,000. He is scheduled to appear in court March 4, Fox News reports.

In his animated, well-received address to CPAC that lasted more than two hours –reportedly the longest of his presidency— Trump urged Williams to file suit against his attacker and the authorities.

“Sue him. But he's probably got nothing but sue him forever. But sue the college, the university, and maybe sue the state. Ladies and gentlemen, he took a hard punch in the face for all of us. Remember that. He took a punch for all of us.”

That may be good advice.

In December, UC Berkeley agreed to compensate Young America’s Foundation (YAF) and Berkeley College Republicans for trampling the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of conservative speakers and students on its campus. The Trump administration sided with campus conservatives against the school. The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest on behalf of the two groups. The department “will not stand by idly while public universities violate students’ constitutional rights,” Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand said at the time.

When conservatives had been scheduled to speak on campus, the campus administration typically didn’t forbid their appearances. Instead, it made the speeches inconvenient to the point of impossibility, for example, forcing students to use venues a mile off campus or at times when students couldn’t attend. Berkeley also often required non-leftist groups to hand over thousands of dollars to defray security costs, a requirement not rigorously or consistently imposed on left-wing speakers or groups.

An aggressive crackdown on non-leftist speech came after Berkeley officials—emboldened by a violent Antifa mob blocking a Feb. 1, 2017 campus appearance by firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos—decided to formalize viewpoint discrimination in the school’s policy on speakers.

Around that time, Trump threatened to withhold federal funds from Berkeley.

“If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?” Trump tweeted Feb. 2, 2017.

The speech, which was sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center (publisher of FrontPage), never happened. Police stood down and allowed left-wing students and activists to “no-platform” Yiannopoulos because they didn’t like his views. Demonstrators caused $100,000 in damage to the campus and several times as much damage to the surrounding town.

The continuing threat of violence by Antifa at Berkeley also led to the cancelation of a planned on-campus premiere of a documentary film this writer executive-produced, America Under Siege: Antifa, during Yiannopoulos’s planned Free Speech Week at the school.

Under the terms of the out-of-court settlement attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon reached with Berkeley, the university was to pay YAF $70,000, rescind its unconstitutional “high-profile speaker policy,” rescind its viewpoint-discriminatory security fee policy, and abolish its heckler’s veto—protesters are no longer allowed to shut down conservative expression.

Berkeley is no longer able to impose a 3:00 p.m. curfew on conservative speech. Nor is it allowed to ban advertisements for YAF-sponsored campus lectures or relegate conservative speakers to remote or inconvenient lecture halls on campus while giving leftist speakers access to preferred locations.

At CPAC, Trump praised the conservative activists in the audience.

“Young Americans like you are leading the revival of American liberty sovereignty and self-determination in the face of left-wing intolerance. The anger, the unbelievable anger. I see it every day. Fortunately for you it's mostly pointed at me. You have the courage to speak the truth. To do what is right. And to fight for what you believe and keep doing it.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1moretime

1 posted on 03/05/2019 1:59:51 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I've got an even better idea.

Complete separation of university and state.

2 posted on 03/05/2019 2:12:05 AM PST by Salman (Democrats. The other religion of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

No other Republican would have the balls to do this. In fact they wouldn’t even care.


3 posted on 03/05/2019 2:41:22 AM PST by Hugin ("Not one step from his weapons should a traveler take"...Havamal 38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

L8r


4 posted on 03/05/2019 3:01:29 AM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I hope he does that. But the commies will take it to court like everything else that is common sense and good. I’m still waiting for the sanctuary cities to be defunded.


5 posted on 03/05/2019 3:29:43 AM PST by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Like the idea, even better I DONT WANT MY TAX DOLLARS FUNDING THESE FACTORIES OF ANTI AMERICAN RADICALS. STOP THE FED FUNDING


6 posted on 03/05/2019 3:48:05 AM PST by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Absolutely. They will have it in court before the ink dries.


7 posted on 03/05/2019 4:00:45 AM PST by BadLands59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

“ke the idea, even better I DONT WANT MY TAX DOLLARS FUNDING THESE FACTORIES OF ANTI AMERICAN RADICALS. STOP THE FED FUNDING”

I agree. The answer is to abolish the Department of Education and remove federal money from the education system. Big Education will be forced by market pressures to downsize. Those paying for education (students through loans, parents, alumni through donations, and state legislatures) will lead the charge for cost efficiency and will push to have the cuts in all of the peripheral programs. Goodbye “safe spaces”. Goodbye group therapy. Goodby social justice programs unless alumni and private foundations want to fund them.


8 posted on 03/05/2019 4:07:44 AM PST by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

“But the commies will take it to court like everything else that is common sense and good. I’m still waiting for the sanctuary cities to be defunded.”

Taking the issue of free speech on campus to court might actually be a good thing. It would expose the tyrannical judges who do no uphold the Constitution. While the Democrat House would not impeach a progressive judge a judge who rules for censorship will give ammunition to conservatives in the Senate to block her/him from elevation to higher courts. Plus, a case like this might go all the way to the Supreme Court which should affirm the first amendment.

As to sanctuary cities being defunded you are speaking to the huge disappointment of the GOP controlled House of Representatives from 2011 to 2018. Under the Constitution the House controls the power of the purse. All spending bills originate in the House. Under the leadership of Speakers Boehner and Ryan the House Republicans did nothing to defund obsolete and harmful programs. They either had no stomach for a budget fight or actually believe in big government.

Republicans lost the House because they failed to serve their constituents and were very poor at governing.


9 posted on 03/05/2019 4:15:20 AM PST by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Inb4federalrobedtyrantbolcksitgloballyindefinitely!


10 posted on 03/05/2019 4:42:23 AM PST by chris37 (No wall? No vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Let the commies spend good money on lawyers. I’m sure there’s a limit to how much pro bono commie lawyers will front their clients. After all, the gas, electricity and rent aren’t free. Let them sue for everything. Eventually they’ll tap out and have to resort to violence and then they can be killed.


11 posted on 03/05/2019 4:50:24 AM PST by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Post 3- Amen
Bid tent R’s are so worthless.


12 posted on 03/05/2019 5:26:51 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VietVet876

They could just kill themselves..?

They hate our country.
Capitalism.
Merit
Honor
Laws/rules
Our Constitution.
The Election process.
Christianity and Judaism.
MAGA hats
Our flag
Babies.
Themselves.


13 posted on 03/05/2019 5:35:10 AM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

It’s a great idea - but why not have done this on day one or at least day 100 of the Trump administration? By now, the inevitable court challenges might have been over with.


14 posted on 03/05/2019 5:47:34 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
When I was in college (late 70s), universities were known as bastions of alternate thought. You were exposed to all sorts of nutty ideas and most were rejected without violence as we deployed critical thinking to the proposed idea.

I sat in on meetings with Madelyn Murray O'Hair, avowed communists and others because one ought to have their foundational beliefs tested in the quest for truth.

That's why it is sad to watch today's campuses where non-conformity to liberal groupthink is met with zero tolerance. Emotional thinking and NPC blather has replaced intelligent and reasoned thought.

Who would have believed that colleges would *need* a free speech executive order (which will surely be challenged by Democrats like everything else Trump signs)? What a sad day for America that this is even necessary.

15 posted on 03/05/2019 6:24:33 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Sounds correct in the USA. After all historical religious sites can’t receive government money for up keep. Why should 1st amendment violators get government money?


16 posted on 03/05/2019 6:34:12 AM PST by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Good, now cut off government contracts to any corporation that restricts speech.


17 posted on 03/05/2019 7:13:14 AM PST by Barking Aardvark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The most immediate objection to this is that it “infringes” on colleges and opens the door for more of the same. The snarky response ought to be: it’s about time to infringe on the nonsense.

The real genius of the proposal is that is easily justified as improving the climate for good scholarship- which is what the feds are paying for.


18 posted on 03/05/2019 7:50:22 AM PST by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Can’t wait to see senatorial Republicans justify trying to pass a bill to overturn a Trump EO on this.


19 posted on 03/05/2019 1:42:26 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy (I'd rather have one king 3000 miles away that 3000 kings one mile away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson