Posted on 02/16/2019 10:26:36 AM PST by jazusamo
FBI Covered Up Potential Violations of Law by Hillary Clinton
Docs Show State/FBI Bribery Scandal to Help Protect Hillary Clinton
Left Tries to Torpedo Census Question About Citizenship!
How the Deep State Colludes with Its Friends in the Media
As we watch the slow-motion coup against President Trump lets not forget that at its heart is the Deep States desire to protect Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her illicit behavior.
Now we have more evidence of their cover-up. We just received 186 pages of records from the Department of Justice that include emails documenting an evident cover-up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
We obtained the records through a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit we filed after the DOJ failed respond to a December 4, 2017 FOIA request ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). Judicial Watch is seeking all communications between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page.
The new emails came in response to a May 21 order by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton to the FBI to begin processing 13,000 pages of records exchanged exclusively between Strzok and Page between February 1, 2015, and December 2017. The FBI may not complete review and production of all the Strzok-Page communications until at least 2020.
[Redacted] writes: I am still working on an additional page for these TPs that consist of a chart of the statutory violations considered during the investigation, and the reasons for the recommendation not to prosecute, hopefully in non-lawyer friendly terms
Strzok forwards to Page, Jonathan Moffa and others: I have redlined some points. Broadly, I have some concerns about asking some our [sic] senior field folks to get into the business of briefing this case, particularly when we have the Ds [Comeys] statement as a kind of stand alone document. In my opinion, theres too much nuance, detail, and potential for missteps. But I get they may likely be asked for comment.
[Redacted] writes to Strzok, Page and others: The DD [Andrew McCabe] will need to approve these before they are pushed out to anyone. At the end of last week, he wasnt inclined to send them to anyone. But, its great to have them on the shelf in case theyre needed.
[Redacted] writes to Strzok and Page: Im really not sure why they continued working on these [talking points]. In the morning, Ill make sure Andy [McCabe] tells Mike [Kortan] to keep these in his pocket. I guess Andy just didnt ever have a moment to turn these off with Mike like he said he would.
Page replies: Yes, agree that this is not a good idea.
Neither these talking points nor the chart of potential violations committed by Clinton and her associates has been released.
Rybicki writes: By NLT [no later than] next Monday, the Director would like to see a list of all cases charged in the last 20 years where the gravamen of the charge was mishandling classified information.
It should be in chart form with: (1) case name, (2) a short summary for content (3) charges brought, and (4) charge of conviction.
If need be, we can get it from NSD [National Security Division] and let them know that the Director asked for this personally.
Please let me know who can take the lead on this.
Thanks!
Jim
Page forwards to Strzok: FYSA [For your situational awareness]
Strzok replies to Page: Ill take the lead, of course sounds like an espionage section question Or do you think OGC [Office of the General Counsel] should?
And the more reason for us to get feedback to Rybicki, as we all identified this as an issue/question over a week ago.
Page replies: I was going to reply to Jim [Rybicki] and tell him I can talked [sic] to you about this already. Do you want me to?
A Wilkinson Walsh attorney, emails [Redacted] FBI National Security Division Officials: We wanted to follow up on our conversation from a few days ago. We would like to schedule a time to speak with both you and [Redacted] early next week. Is there a time on Monday or Tuesday that could work on your end?
[Redacted] FBI National Security Division official emails: See below. I am flexible on Monday and Tuesday. [Redacted] can chime in with her availability. It is my understanding that Toscas [ George Toscas , who helped lead Midyear Exam] may have called over to Jim or Trisha [former Principal Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson ] regarding some high-level participation for at least the first few such calls. I am happy to discuss further but wanted to send you this so you could raise within the OGC [Office of the General Counsel] and give me a sense of scheduling options. I am around if you want to talk.
***
[Redacted] FBI National Security Division official writes: In the meantime, Ill tell Hal that we will certainly schedule a call and will get back to him as to timing. Since he knows Beth [Wilkinson] personally, it could be useful to have Jim on the phone if she is going to be haranguing us re: the laptops.
[Redacted] FBI Office of the General Counsel writes: More I guess this is [Redacteds] rationale for why we need to have the GC on the call to discuss the fact that we will be following all of our legal obligations and FBI policies/procedures with regard to the disposition of the materials in this case.
Strzok writes: You are perfectly competent to speak to the legal obligations and FBI policy/procedures. We should NOT be treating opposing counsel this way. We would not in any other case.
[Redacted] NSD official responds: Would like to see what you have on your agenda so we could see what we might want to add on our end. I will mention to [Redacted]. Also interested in understanding FBI OGCs analysis of the privilege and ethics issues we are facing.
Strzok forwards to Page: Pretty nonresponsive.
Page responds: Why provide them an agenda? I wouldnt do that until you have a sense of how Andy [McCabe] wants to go. So no. Well talk about what were going to talk about and then they can talk about what they want to talk about. Also, seriously Pete. F him. OGC needs to provide an analysis? We havent done one. But they seem to be categorical that its just impossible, Id just like to know why.
And now Im angry before bed again.?
Total indulgence, theres a TV in here. Heres hoping I can find something to sufficiently melt my brain???
Strzok replies: Because I want to make this productive! Why NOT provide them an agenda!?!? We all talk about what we want to talk about and thats a waste of time.
They havent done one either (legal analysis)
Assume noble intent.
How do we maximize this use of time?
Page writes: Im ignoring all this and going to bed.
Strzok and Page were discussing a meeting that the Justice Department and FBI were about to have concerning, among other things, privilege and ethics issues we are facing.
Strzok writes: Were looking into it and will get back to you this afternoon; the answer may require some tweaking, the question is whether this is the forum to do it. The email is addressed to FBI intelligence analyst Moffa; Rybicki; Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired; Lisa Page and others.
Strzoks suggested press response is fully redacted, but included is his deferral to the 7thfloor as to whether to release to this reporter or in another manner.
When asked should we provide any additional information to FactCheck.org or would any updates more appropriately be give [sic] directly to Congress? Strzok defers to Jim/Lisa [Page] and [Redacted].
What this all means: We have caught the FBI in another cover-up to protect Hillary Clinton. These records show that the FBI is hiding a chart detailing possible violations of law by Hillary Clinton and the supposed reasons she was not prosecuted.
Let us hope our new attorney general is paying attention.
Every day I pray to God that these evil people receive justice.
Off the Wall Ping!
Contact to be added.
I hear you and they are many.
But nothing ever happens to these traitors, it’s been 2 years since Trumps election and not even 1 arrest. Disheartening.
Hiding in plain sight. Disgusting.
We all do, but it is worth noting that all have been exposed, questioned under oath, and fired. Not very many democrats even are applauding these creeps as good examples of how government agencies are supposed to work.
Wake me when someone goes to jail.
The longer it takes the more crimes they will have to tie around their necks.
I can only hope that it’s true that the wheels of justice grind exceedingly slow.
(Thought Id be first with the standard Clinton talking points, just for fun.)
Nothing will be done. It’s maddening. There is so much that I just don’t understand or comprehend.
For me it will be the Rapture.
Yep, many feel that way.
I pray we’ll see the day that she and her mob are at least charged with a crime, Lord knows they should be.
“Not very many democrats even are applauding these creeps as good examples of how government agencies are supposed to work”.
I don’t agree. Most dems agree with what they’ve done. Their goal is total control.
And most Americans don’t even know about it.
The MSM, a tool of the Deep State and the Dems has certainly covered for them. Most of the MSM is fully supportive.
Lets wrap this Freepathon up, Folks!
Hopefully so. I don’t believe one Donald J. Trump is going to let this go away without as much justice being served as possible.
Reading the back and forth inane banter of these FBI handjobs who are supposed to be the best of the best, the untouchables, beyond reproach, enforcers etc, gives one pause. Imagine how mediocre lesser government agencies are staffed.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.