Posted on 02/11/2019 1:12:42 PM PST by Red Badger
Yeah, why don’t we give the machetes so they can skillfully chop whities heads off
Load-O'-Bull.
My family is black, and has been passing down real estate holdings to heirs for generations.
You’re welcome; this nonsense has to be called out every time...
Way too much trouble to give any of them anything. Give them nothing, and no apology of any kind. Oh and while we’re there, ask them to apologize for all the trouble and expense we’ve been put through by them since they’ve been free.
I believe I should receive reparations monies for
not having ever owned slave and receiving profits
therefrom.
the South African Model worked so well....
Please check my math and let me know if I made a math error.
Then use or adapt what I posted to counter this bs, and ping me.
On top of all that, New Orleans had enough small parish churches in the early '60s that it is unlikely that Brazile ever saw segregated seating in church. Many churches in predominantly black parts of the city were already "desegregated", even before Rummel took action. Yes, Donna is spinning a convenient yarn.
Your point is perfect - and some malcontents, when they’ve been free for THREE times as long as slavery existed in the US, will still want “reparations”...
Why not, the Spaniards were the first ones who brought slaves to the Americas?
My Civil War ancestors fought for the North - how about reparations from the blacks to all whites who gave their lives or their limbs to set the blacks free?
Will I be expected to give funds for reparations when my ancestors fought to free the blacks? What about all descendents of all Union soldiers who fought?
What about all the whites in the south who did not own slaves?
Few more points: no amount of reparations would satisfy many - they’d always want more.
Give sums of money to those who have never known how to manage it - and it will be gone in a short time. Then what? More reparations?
I could go on for hours......
There are only about 1,000 reasons reparations are plain and simply WRONG.
In 1959?
I’m speaking of the Catholic Church in the United States in 1959 - but you knew that.
I was referring to your comment that Hispanics don’t want to fund that charade.
You could say that about practically any two groups of people: Catholics and Protestants, Arabs and Jews, Greeks and Turks, Cowboys fans and Redskins fans, Muslims and everyone else.
As long as just one side is willing to ‘live and let live’ but the other is intransigent or outright hostile, there will never be ‘peace’, until Jesus returns and stops all the foolishness................
We’re already getting the South Africa deal....4% of the population already commits about 50% of all violent crime.
Me, being half Filipino, don’t owe them a penny.
My other ‘half’ were dirt poor and never had any slaves, going back to the Revolutionary War...........
Well, you could compare and contrast South Africa in 1989 with South Africa in 2019, but it should be enough to point out that whites are not 9% of the US population.
Someone, I don’t remember who, once said that you could give black Americans ‘reparations’ in cash of let’s say, $100K per family and in a year’s time you would get it all back...............
Or Rhodesia with Zimbabwe.........................
Remember the Dem Party is all about ‘paternalism’.
They look upon every member of every minority as being helpless, and they want them to stay that way.
“Vote for US and WE will Help You, you poor miserable person!” but they have no intention of ever doing so.
If you have a political party whose power base is ‘poor’ people, you will make damn sure you never run out of ‘poor people’, and will increase their numbers at every opportunity, even if you have to IMPORT THEM FROM SOUTH OF THE BORDER.
Why can’t people see this?...........................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.