Posted on 02/11/2019 11:38:38 AM PST by Red Badger
The bizarre case of Jussie Smollett continues to unfold with the police still investigating what Smollett insists was a "hate crime."
Smollett tells the story of walking down the street in sub-zero temperatures and being attacked by two men wearing MAGA hats and screaming racial and homophobic slurs at him. Was this a hate crime?
Maybe it was. And then, maybe he wasn't attacked at all.
The incident occurred in Chicago, a city torn by racial strife and massive distrust of the police. John Ziegler of Mediaite writes of how the investigation is unfolding:
Among other things, the police have made it very clear they have not yet found any proof of an attack, despite having almost all of Smollett’s movements on surveillance video. They have disclosed that Smollett would not give over his cell phone to verify his timeline of events. They even published photos of “persons of interest” that they had to know were going to be universally mocked for being obviously irrelevant.
In my view, none of those important revelations would have been made public in the way that they were, unless there was extreme suspicion within the police force that Smollett’s story was not fully accurate.
By extension, media figures would not be being told by their police sources, as I have been told is currently happening both routinely and with vigor, that the authorities are acting on the assumption that they will never find any evidence to fully substantiate Smollett’s story. This isn’t just happening via idle speculation either, the police are doing so with great specificity, even including an alternative theory for what really happened (current attempts to find the origin of the rope found around Smollett’s neck long after the event was over are believed to be the most likely game-changer, if there ever is one in this case).
In truth, the Chicago police are terrified of even hinting they doubt Smollett's story. There is no major city in the U.S. where the cops are more distrusted by blacks than in Chicago. The police risk a riot if they let it be known they think Smollett is trying to hoax them.
The media -- also massively distrusted by blacks in the city for supposedly always placing them in a bad light -- is tiptoeing around the hoax story.
As for the Chicago media, a couple of local television reporters are apparently using Twitter as a confessional for information about the case that their stations currently fear to air. Rob Elgas of the Chicago ABC affiliate, and Rafer Weigel of the Fox station (which carries Smollett’s show Empire) have continually updated the developments, or lack thereof, in a way that paints a much different picture from the one that viewers would see on an actual newscast.
It is very obvious that if one major news outlet in Chicago had the guts to be the first to openly discredit Smollett’s story, the others would soon follow the leader. But because the risk of being wrong in this situation (see Smollett’s PC Force Field), there is just no incentive to take that dive until and unless the police finally make a definitive statement.
Will the police let the matter die rather than prosecute Smollett? Fox's Weigel says no:
#ChicagoPolice Supt Eddie Johnson says #JussieSmollett is still being treated as the victim in this case but if the investigation does reveal he made a false report he will be held accountable. — Rafer Weigel (@RaferWeigel) February 5, 2019
Since so many have asked me if @Chicago_Police will let #JussieSmollett case go unsolved, I’ll give my opinion. Given the high-profile nature of the crime, I don’t believe so. I believe they’ll either find the perpetrators responsible or charge #Smollett w/ filing a false report — Rafer Weigel (@RaferWeigel) February 8, 2019
I will believe that when I see it.
The cops have subpoenaed Smollett's phone records. It will be awkward for him if he fights the action. But it won't matter now. If the police drop the matter without finding the perpetrators, the outcry in the black community will be just as loud. And if they charge Smollett, violence will be likely.
Maybe the cell phone records will buttress the actor's case. But there are upwards of 30,000 surveillance cameras in the city and not one of them has apparently caught Smollett's attackers.
No one is going out in the freezing cold to protest a negative finding in the Smollett case.
No one died. Dude has no injuries. There are no perps. The story isn't credible. There are no witnesses. No video. He won't let police inspect his cell phone.
No one is coming to defend this guy when the truth comes out.
Never underestimate the Left’s power to get people riled up.
Even if they have to pay them to do so....................
They first have to have a believable crisis to exploit. A killing, a harsh court judgement, a perceived racial injustice, a major court case or legislative battle, etc.
The Smollett thing is a nothingburger. There's no political advantage to be gained by raising a ruckus for this guy - especially given the complete lack of evidence involved. If there were even the slightest bit of physical evidence to back the guy's story, you'd have your crisis and an exploitable opportunity.
Anyone sticking their neck out for this guy is going to wind up with a tar baby on their hands, and they know it.
Liberals have no foresight. All they see is the ‘now’.
I made a cursory examination of a lot of the Smollett news sites and there are still a lot of supporters out there, regardless of this fallacy and lack of evidence. THEY BELIEVE.
It doesn’t matter to them what the cops say, do or don’t say or do. They believe.
They will say the cops are racists, the cops are homophobes, the cops are incompetent, the cops never like OUR Jussie, whatever it takes to reinforce their belief system.
It will take full color, High def, 3D video of him putting the rope on himself, and even then they will say it’s doctored to incriminate Jussie.
Just watch.It’s coming....................
And when it doesn't, will you ping me and admit it? No.
Okay.
But liberals are soooo predictable........................
Yes, they are, which is why I'm taking the position that the Smollett story is too weak for them to hang their hat on.
Too much political risk for questionable political gain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.