Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roadcat

You may disagree with her policies all day long - and I do, but to say she’s not attractive is just delusional. She’s not drop dead gorgeous, but she’s certainly not ugly. FReepers get their jollies out of comparing her with a horse. That’s just plain stupid. Fight her on substance, not on looks.


14 posted on 02/09/2019 9:09:51 PM PST by tenger (If we don't stay on 'em, they'll get it wrong. - Joe Soucheray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: tenger
She’s not drop dead gorgeous, but she’s certainly not ugly.

I'm not saying she's ugly, but she sure isn't glamorous. She looks like a cartoon character, with a grin like a horse and eyes like a bug; I'd bust out laughing before planting a kiss on her!

29 posted on 02/09/2019 9:35:41 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: tenger
not ugly'

I agree. You want ugly? Maxine Waters is ugly. Not as ugly as her soul but close

34 posted on 02/09/2019 11:21:42 PM PST by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: tenger

This woman in the looks department is both ugly and cute.

That dance video of hers, with that hair style, not showing her horse smile and bug eyes, she was certainly very cute and appealing.

Now in office her hair style is that laid down combed back look that seems to accent her bug eyes and flared nose. Now she is far from cute if not borderline ugly.

Her persona today is that “Che” Guevara revolutionary look that matches her ambitions. She’s very dangerous.

That new look of hers represents substance and is worth commenting on simply because that look is on purpose to fit who she is - a revolutionary.


44 posted on 02/10/2019 4:22:52 AM PST by redfreedom (Elizabeth Warren has more Indian blood in her than journalism has truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: tenger

So, don’t give her a sugar cube and say, good girl?


47 posted on 02/10/2019 4:40:37 AM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: tenger; Jmouse007

She’s a dim witted, rabid COMMUNIST NUT!


This is what makes her unattractive, and the fact that she’s a stick with boobs.


49 posted on 02/10/2019 4:49:45 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: tenger; roadcat; BenLurkin; Extremely Extreme Extremist
This is my Ocasio-Cortex Serious Ideological Weapon

This is my Ocasio-Cortex Derisive Buck Toothed Horse Faced Gun

This one's for Fighting

This one's for Fun

We can and should attack her justifiably on both fronts. She may be physically attractive to some when her mouth is closed, but as soon as she opens her mouth and you hear the evil within, she ceases to be "attractive". Beauty is only skin deep with people like her, and evil wrapped in a good looking suit that only shows its true face is evil...is still evil.

But we hear, even from conservatives:

She's Harmless.

She's Inexperienced.

She's Kind of Cute.

She's Only Spouting Words.

She's Harmless.

Am I going too far calling her evil? Billions of people in the last century or so who have been under the gun of devotees to her ideology would beg to disagree that goes too far, not to mention the hundreds of millions who suffered and died at the hands of "reformers" like her.

She is fully deserving of all the invective we can deliver on target including the kitchen sink. We aren't shallow enough to fall for her skin deep wrapping, and we aren't stupid enough to fall for her toxic and destructive ideology.

We do the same thing (and rightfully so) to Leftist males who subscribe to the same things that would result in the destruction of our Republic, so it isn't sexism.

We should throw everything at her and her ilk.

Everything.

Because the State, and people like her who would run the state if they gain power, will be throwing everything at us, and it won't just be the kitchen sink and Internet memes.

It is going to be universal surveillance, midnight raids, prisons, kangaroo courts, imprisonment and bullets to the back of the head at the hands of pretty people like her who get to inflict her ideologies by force.

It will be poverty, imprisonment, destitution, starvation and death, and those will be deliberately inflicted on everyone including people who supported her and her like.

53 posted on 02/10/2019 7:54:24 AM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson