She hasn't been seen of heard from in 2 months, yet she votes. Why isn't anyone screaming about that?
GW Bush following his father’s way.
What are the baby killers trying to pull here? Where is Ginsburg?! And don’t say at a concert in a dark corner!
What could go wrong with a medical procedure? Why not have hospital privileges? Woundn’t that make customer feel more confident when choosing services? Wouldn’t that help with lower insurance costs? Wouldn’t that help in case of a law suit?
Yeah, so much for state’s rights... Thanks Roberts. Even though he wants a full review of it- as if he would change his vote.
Was rbg there, IN PERSON, to hear arguments?
Did anyone read it.
The decision was not to enforce the new law till a ruling by the court en banc
Ill ping a real lawyer and a pseudo lawyer like me too..lol
Hey I took the El Sat....Im almost a lawyer right..
Bookmarked to read comments later.
The abortion clause of the US Constitution the SCOTUS enforces sure is tricky. Its to bad we don’t have a 10th Amendment to protect States Rights in matters where the Constitution doesn’t specifically empower the federal government.
Priceless.
Listen to what the body language expert said about the Justices’ stress at the SOTU...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7EbTMOrO3g&feature=youtu.be&t=389
Chief Justice John Roberts joined the courts four liberals in putting a hold on the law, pending a full review of the case.
—
John Roberts... the Supreme Court’s own Jeff Sessions.
John Roberts is a disgrace. Another in a long line of lawyers who deceived the Republican presidents who appointed them. https://t.co/HRZdx7193j— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) February 8, 2019
The left definitely has some dossier on Roberts. What did RBG do to cast her vote, blink twice?
Whats in Roberts HS yearbook?
The blackmailed justice votes against the conservatives again!
Roberts is a disaster.
Is Ruth Buzzie voting from the Hospice center?
The left, including now Roberts, wants back-alley abortions to be the norm. What else do you call abortion centers which aren’t medically connected in case of emergencies?
Although this is just a hold, I thought Roberts does not like close opinions/divided court; what a hypocritical A-hole. Of course this could be a administrative move designed to be heard later, whatever.