Posted on 01/31/2019 8:38:46 AM PST by slumber1
On Monday evening in Houston, a dozen armed men broke into the home of Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas, a middle-aged couple who had lived in the house at 7815 Harding Street for at least two decades. The first man through the door, who was armed with a shotgun, used it to kill one of the couple's dogs. Tuttle responded to the home invasion by grabbing a revolver and shooting the man with the shotgun, who collapsed on a sofa in the living room. As Nicholas tried to disarm the intruder, his accomplices shot her. Tuttle returned fire, and by the end of the shootout he and his wife were both dead. Four of the assailants were hit by gunfire, while a fifth injured his knee.
(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...
Which number are you on the witness list?
Mis-stating someone elses comment so you can refute what they didn't say is lame. And you calling anyone else stupid is hilarious.
It aged as expected. It was obvious from the start. In this case the elite blue line couldn’t cover for this level of corruption. What is so sad there is one here on FR that still has judged and agreed with the execution of two people. The poor family were murdered, framed, ...
I can point to the evidence he was guilty. There has been NO evidence made public that officer in question is guilty. For him to found guilty would require the testimony of all of the other officers. But, none of them have said so publicly.
I really couldn't give a damn if the officer is convicted or not. Nor do a care that the two losers that resisted arrest are dead, either.
I have feeling you'd die the same way if the police kicked down your door. You'd resist arrest and end up dead rather than surrender and live to clear your name.
You're not very bright.
Which one are you. You're the one claiming the officer committed murder when you weren't there.
I'm the one that wants to hear all the evidence before I make a determination as to his guilt.
Because judging by your response, I question both your reading comprehension and your mental state. You have in numerous posts to different posters made statements that would give a reasonable person the implication that you were an eye witness. Other that state that I believed that they planted evidence, I made no statement that suggested their guilt or not guilt. Last but not least, none of the posts made by you that I read did you implicate that you were a neutral observer, merely interested in ascertaining the facts. It is the Office of the District Attorney that you should direct your comments. They probably would be interested in them.
Respond when you are lucid, perhaps we can discuss it.
And downthread, the jackboot licker is still slavering over his taste of vintage boot leather...
Really? They deserved to be murdered in their own home?
But I thought you were big on evidence of wrong doing. There is none against them. You said people need to be charged and convicted before anyone can say they're guilty. Oh, or do you mean just dirty cops?
You're not very bright
LOL! You're the one that can't make a coherent argument. Slinging invectives seems to be your way of saying "I can't refute your argument". That sounds like something stupid people would do.
Well, except for the murded couple.
Yes. Maybe you are capable of learning.
The policemen suffered a total of four bullet wounds from a man who was armed with a six-shot revolver
Proof you're reactionary idiot. No one has been convicted. No testimony has been given.
Proof you're reactionary idiot. No one has been convicted. No testimony has been given before a jury.
Absolutely, they deserved to die. They decided to unleash a pit bull and decided to shoot it out with police. That will result in one dying every time.
That probably be your fate when the police come after hearing about your stash. I have no doubt you'd decide to go out in blaze of glory.
There was no evidence of heroin and claim was that they were heroin. The police screwed that part up, lied about having an informant and two were forced to retire. There was no cover up.
That is utterly irrelevant because the two losers decided to get into a shootout with police. They were too stupid not to resist arrest, live and clear their names.
It was when the officer's superiors began deconstructing their reports and after action reports that their case began falling apart.As far as who did what, the legal system can and will determine that. When it wishes, the System can be very efficient.
LOL! Wiki?
No firearms were among the evidence listed by your heroes.
THE COPS ALL LIED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.