Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muller says Russians are altering evidence from special counsel's investigation to descredit
Yahoo/The Independent ^ | 1/30/19 | Clark Mindock

Posted on 01/31/2019 8:08:26 AM PST by Jaded

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Jaded

Russians would never alter evidence to support changing peoples’ minds about historical events, it’s just not in the national character to commit fraud of that sort.

http://www.history101.com/photo-altering-soviet-union/


21 posted on 01/31/2019 8:19:28 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The fact that there is no evidence that Trump colluded with Russia is proof that Trump colluded with Russia.


22 posted on 01/31/2019 8:21:13 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

He’d better be able to prove his claim that they’re altering evidence. Because it makes him look like a partisan hack on a witch hunt who is lashing out in frustration that he can’t railroad people.


23 posted on 01/31/2019 8:21:41 AM PST by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Not just any Russians...

Elizabeth.


24 posted on 01/31/2019 8:23:37 AM PST by OKSooner (Whichever one you already have, go buy the other one and then you'll have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs

Dog ate my evidence..


25 posted on 01/31/2019 8:24:32 AM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

“altered it in a bid to discredit the probe”

I see so when it comes that it was all BS it will only seem that way because the Russkies rigged the evidence. So they were able to get into Muellers offices and destroy the original pristine evidence? And the MSM reports this with no skepticism. Shesh.


26 posted on 01/31/2019 8:24:37 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

27 posted on 01/31/2019 8:26:01 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs

He’s saying what he knows the democrats have been doing and those in his own investigation....


28 posted on 01/31/2019 8:28:14 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; All

OMG! Just give it up! Enough!


29 posted on 01/31/2019 8:29:30 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ( "Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

Well Mueller was forced to reveal files that probably exonerated the Russian company or incriminated Mueller. So Mueller now says those files are forgeries. This is getting stranger as it should be easy to prove one way or another. But if they say that the Russians changed the files and they didn’t, how can they prove they didn’t? But in order for this to even be believed Mueller would have to claim that he gave the Russians the original files and has no duplicates which again is ridiculous.


30 posted on 01/31/2019 8:30:04 AM PST by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock
It's actually an interesting dilemma for a prosecutor, if you think about it. Here's the hypothetical scenario:

1. The prosecution shares information with the defense, as required by law in a criminal trial.

2. The defense alters the information -- not for the purpose of misleading anyone involved in the case, but for the purpose of leaking it to the media and the public to undermine the prosecution in the "court of public opinion." I am sure there is nothing illegal about this.

3. The prosecution is almost certainly precluded -- by law, or by rules of the court -- from going to the media to correct the record by sharing the accurate information.

31 posted on 01/31/2019 8:31:15 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

They are essentially saying

It’s not the lack of evidence or the fact that it was all based on a fantasy cooked up by democrats to link someone else to their own crimes.

No, it’s

The Russians are making us look stupid..

Hmmm!
That explains it.....


32 posted on 01/31/2019 8:32:04 AM PST by jmclemore (Go Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
As I read this, it appears nothing was altered.
Rather, they chose to not use data to put themselves in a better light ?

“The person who created the webpage used their knowledge of the non-sensitive discovery to make it appear as though the irrelevant files contained on the webpage were the sum total evidence of ‘IRA and Russian collusion’ gathered by law enforcement in this matter in an apparent effort to discredit the investigation."
33 posted on 01/31/2019 8:32:40 AM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

Man, those Russians are good. They have super powers over everything.


34 posted on 01/31/2019 8:33:21 AM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

Yeah sure, Persecutor Bob, whatever you say, brah.


35 posted on 01/31/2019 8:34:00 AM PST by chris37 (No wall? No vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

How does Russia lying discredit Meuller’s facts? Doesnt he trust a federal judge to judge the facts? This only shows Meuller’s lack of security/confidentiality in handling his own information.


36 posted on 01/31/2019 8:34:28 AM PST by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

No, this is what it is about:
“The most recent filing argued that attorneys for Concord (Management) should not be given access to “sensitive” evidence gathered for the case.”


37 posted on 01/31/2019 8:41:24 AM PST by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

No, this is what it is about:
“The most recent filing argued that attorneys for Concord (Management) should not be given access to “sensitive” evidence gathered for the case.”


38 posted on 01/31/2019 8:41:35 AM PST by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

“The Russians stole my Homework!” - Robert Mueller


39 posted on 01/31/2019 8:41:47 AM PST by yuleeyahoo (The nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

Who is a bigger threat to an individual American’s liberty and security? Mueller or Russia?

Mueller and FBI no doubt. Mueller and FBI are the lying commie bastards.

Jury nullification on all Federal cases unless a Fed, muzzie, bureaucrat or politician are the defendants. It really has come to that. If these people take over, we’re done.


40 posted on 01/31/2019 8:42:12 AM PST by grumpygresh (Tout ou rien. Is this the Rubicon year?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson