Skip to comments.Trump: ‘Democrat IT Scandal Is A Key To Much Of The Corruption We See Today’
Posted on 01/28/2019 2:49:59 PM PST by Baynative
Imran Awan worked as Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultzs email server administrator in the House of Representatives. Nearly his entire family then joined the payroll of other Democrats, until they worked for 1 in 5 House Democrats and had as the House inspector general called it the keys to the kingdom and ability to access any file.
1. Imran worked for Debbie Wasserman Schultz since 2004 and had the passwords to her devices
A search of his name on WikiLeaks shows the DNC summoned Imran when they needed her device unlocked. (cont'd)
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
2. During the 2016 election, the Houses Office of Inspector General warned that Imran and his family were making unauthorized access to data
A September 30, 2016, presentation alleged Imran Awan and his family members were logging into the servers of members who had previously fired him, funneling data off the network, and that evidence suggests steps are being taken to conceal their activity.
The Awan groups behavior mirrored a classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization, the briefing materials allege. The presentation especially found problems on one server: that of the House Democratic Caucus, an entity similar to the DNC that was chaired at the time by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra. The first warning came in July 2016 the same month Wikileaks published the DNC emails.
On February 3, 2017, Paul Irving, the Houses top law enforcement officer, wrote in a letter to the Committee on House Administration:
Based upon the evidence gathered to this point, we have concluded the employees are an ongoing and serious risk to the House of Representatives, possibly threatening the integrity of our information systems and thereby members capacity to serve constituents . This could have resulted in Member data being accessed by someone unknown and unauthorized by the offices.
3. Despite the election-time rhetoric about hacking, the Awan group was left on the House computer network until February 2, 2017 days after Donald Trumps inauguration
The House inspector general, a distinguished cybersecurity expert, was taken off the case, and it was given to the Capitol Police instead. Months later, police banned the Awan group from the network. The Committee on House Administration put out a statement saying House Officials became aware of suspicious activity and alleged theft committed by certain House IT support staff. But the IG report, obtained by TheDCNF, shows that theft was not the primary issue being warned about.
House Speaker Paul Ryan declined to explain the timeline between the July 2016 warning of a cyberbreach and the February 2017 ban. Judiciary Committee member Rep. Louie Gohmert said Tuesday that the FBI knows of witnesses with key evidence in the case, but is refusing to accept evidence from them.
4. Shortly after the IG report came out in September 2016, the Caucus server identified as prime evidence in the cybersecurity case physically disappeared, according to Irvings February 3 letter
Authorities took the disappearance as evidence tampering, they said. Becerra said he wont discuss the incident because of an ongoing criminal investigation.
5. Wasserman Schultz declined to fire Imran despite knowing he was suspected of cyber-security violations, even though she had just lost her job as DNC chair after its anemic handling of its data breach
Her office claimed Imran could work on websites and printers without accessing the network. Watchdog group FACT has filed an ethics complaint saying this was impossible, and a cybersecurity publication called the judgment negligent.
6. After Imran was banned from the network, he left a laptop with the username RepDWS in a phone booth
along with a letter to prosecutors and a copy of his ID. Capitol Police found the laptop at midnight and seized it because they recognized Imran as a criminal suspect. Wasserman Schultz still didnt fire Imran. Instead, she threatened Capitol Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa with consequences if he didnt give it back, implying it was a members laptop. The police chief refused.
She hired a lawyer to block prosecutors from examining the laptop, then later said, This was not my laptop. I have never seen that laptop. Imrans lawyer then said he very strongly believes the laptop cannot be examined because of attorney-client privilege. Prosecutors did not challenge that assertion in court. Wasserman Schultz also allegedly screamed at House officials trying to get them to drop the probe, which would have complicated the Russia narrative.
7. The FBI began surveiling the family but let Imrans wife, Hina Alvi, leave the country
She flew to Pakistan with cardboard boxes of possessions, FBI agents said in an affidavit. They approached her at the airport, but she refused to talk to them. They found $12,000 in cash but let her board anyway, writing they do not believe that Alvi has any intention to return to the United States.
8. Prosecutors arrested Imran at the airport after he began liquidating assets
Imran and his wife had wired $300,000 to Pakistan after allegedly both cashing out a federal retirement account and taking a second mortgage under allegedly false pretenses. The FBI arrested Imran at the airport, and he was charged with bank fraud. Democrats have claimed the case is therefore about bank fraud, but prosecutors imply in court papers the bank fraud occurred because the Awans learned they were under investigation for other activities. Based on the suspicious timing of that transaction, Awan and Alvi likely knew they were under investigation at that time, prosecutors wrote of the money moves.
Imrans lawyer is a former aide to Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Wasserman Schultzs brother is an attorney at the same prosecutors office that is handling the case, the US Attorney for the District of Columbia.
9. Connections to foreign entities a former business partner of Imrans father says the father handed over a USB of data to a Pakistani official and that Imran claimed he power to change the US president
The FBI never interviewed the business partner. TheDCNF traveled in Pakistan where numerous locals alleged that Imran traveled that country with an entourage of Pakistani government agents, and routinely boasted about mysterious political influence.
Imran and Abid operated a car dealership referred to as CIA that took $100,000 from an Iraqi government official who is a fugitive from U.S. authorities, according to a business partners testimony in a civil lawsuit.
The Awans travel in Pakistan with protection from an armed entourage of government agents, numerous sources in Pakistan said, and their stepmother said in court documents. Relatives said they were sending money and equipment to Pakistani government officials.
After Imran was banned from the House network, an email address that belonged to him, firstname.lastname@example.org, appeared to still be active and invoked the name of a national security and foreign affairs specialist for Rep. Andre Carson, an intelligence committee member.
10. Nearly Imrans entire family was on the House payroll at high salaries, despite most of them having no training in IT Democrats failed to vet them
All 44 of their House employers exempted them from background checks. Among the red flags in Imrans brothers Abids background were a $1.1 million bankruptcy; six lawsuits against him or a company he owned; and at least three misdemeanor convictions. One of the employees most recent work experience was being fired from McDonalds.
12. The Awans relatives, colleagues and tenants say they would do anything for money
Their own stepmother alleges they wiretapped, extorted her and held her captive. Imrans own wife, Hina Alvi, filed a lawsuit in Pakistan in September 2017 alleging he controlled Hina with violent threats. Wasserman Schultz said police might be Islamophobic, but Imran was the subject of repeated calls to police by multiple Muslim women.
13. The cybersecurity investigation started after allegedly falsified invoices first caught administrators attention. The Awans lawyers said members wanted the records to be falsified and blamed them for a shocking lack of IT diligence, suggesting that a trial could be politically damaging for Democrats.
No one has been charged for unauthorized access or falsified invoices or even a host of other apparent lesser crimes, and Imrans court date has been postponed seven times. It is now scheduled for July 3, 2018, a classic holiday weekend news dump. No one has publicly reconciled the server logs showing unauthorized access and the allegedly falsified financial records with the lack of charges two years later.
14. The Department of Justice says it is seeking a plea deal with Awan apparently for minor charges despite the serious nature of the conduct documented by the IG.
This comes after law enforcement accidentally gave evidence to the defense instead of the prosecutors; and despite an allegation that Awan may be currently trying to hide his money even as he negotiates.
A list of TheDCNFs 60 stories is below, followed by a list of all the Congress members to whose data the Awans had access.
"The counter-attack was SOOO much faster this time, it was like...they were WAITING for us..."
Appears ol’ PDJT knows a LOT more than he’s letting on.
Well he better start doing somethng about it instead of just talking about it
I wuz just going to post: "Trump Knows!" [about so much].
He tried to play nice, didn’t work. Time to load up the cannons and start firing off some rounds.
He really doesn’t have time to waste and needs to start knocking some people down. The election is not that far away when you think about it. He has a lot of ground to gain.
Hell start actually punching soon, I suspect. No more light, testing jabs.
And the poor little rats and swamp vermin will begin crying loudly about their abuse.
Trump could use some high powered backup, but it seems to be mostly absent.
Unbelievably a bad situation.
Those GOpeers who are not providing support will find their foundations to be crumbling as time goes by.
Good for you, Trump. You are RIGHT OVER THE TARGET on this matter and the depths Team Obama went to to force patriots into submission and destroy our Republic VIA BLACKMAIL MATERIAL.
Trump’s got nothing to lose now. Time to go nuclear.
Not just Demonincrat corruption, but Demonicrat treason.
I agree, as always they have over played their hand - MSM and DNC - he has nothing to lose.
SHOCKERIMRAN AWAN, HOUSE DEMOCRATS’ EMPLOYEE, WORKED HOUSE INTEL IN PAKISTAN-
Cong Louis Gohmert (Repub-Texas), a former judge, was shocked to learn that Imran Awan conducted the Congress of
the United States IT work in Pakistan, for months at a time, without supervision.
GOHMERT: ....for months at a time, Awan was handling information technology for the House Democrats IN Pakistan.
This is just mind-boggling. I had no idea anybody would even think about trying to do something like that, Gohmert added.
Imran is a US govt employee. He cashes US govt paychecks. Hes handling Congressional datasensitive top secret data-hes in an active terrorist country for months at a time handling US intel without supervision. Yet his mentor and employer Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz did nothing. Congressional Democrats who employed Imran said nothing.
Taxpayers must demand answers:
<><> How did Awan get a sensitive job in the US Congress?
<><> Was he given preference over American job-seekers?
<><> Claiming to be a naturalized American citizen, did he falsify his credentials?
<><> did Democrat Debbie Wassermann Schultz sign-off on Imrans trips to Pakistan?
<><> did Democrat Schultz inform others that Imran conducted IT work for the House in Pakistan?
<><> did Democrats inform constituents their emails were being accessed in a terrorist-sponsored country?
<><> why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz keep Imran on as her advisor after his shady deals were exposed?
TAXPAYERS DEMAND TO KNOW WHY WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AND DEMOCRATS ALLOWED A US GOVT EMPLOYEE TO HANDLE US INTEL AND THEIR AMERICAN CONSTITUENTS PERSONAL EMAILS IN A TERRORIST-SPONSORED COUNTRY
Wassermann Schultz installed Imran and his clan of two brothers, two wives, one a Russian national, one known friend, and a host of ghost employees in the US Congress. Taxpayers demand to know the extent of Schultzs assistance to (A) the three House members of the House intelligence panel, and, (B) the five House members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, among the dozens of elected Democrats employing the Pakistani ITs.
CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-14
WHAT EXACTLY IS HUSSEIN OBAMA DOING INSIDE HIS IMPENETRABLE BRICK-WALLED COMPOUND?
VIA BLACKMAIL MATERIAL
Seems to be the strongest currency in the District of Corruption.
APRIL 2016 THE PAKI SCAM IS UNVEILED---
Alarm bells went off when House computer security officials reported irregularities in tech equipment purchases......
Specifically, the theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars in US government property.
The initial evidence pointed to (a) five Paki IT staffers, and, (b) Congressional Democrats that employed them.
DEMOCRATS KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THIS---The Paki scam quickly exploded into:
<><> (A) multiple charges of conspiracy against the United States of America,
<><>(B) double-billing Congress,
<><> (C) placing ghost employees on the govt payroll,
<><> (D) stealing govt issue electronics,
<><> (E) submitting falsified documents,
<><> (F) mortgage scams,
<><>(G) shady wire transfers to Pakistan, and,
<><>(H) Congressional bank fraud.
Democrats hired this bunch to boost their diversity credentials....sucking up for votes is never far from their small minds.
THE DEMOCRAT DIRTY THIRTY----UP TO 80 DEMOCRATS EMPLOYED THE IMRAN CLAN
Interactive at Daily Caller web site.
Circa Sept 2016, the Paki spy operation was full-blown, using Xavier Becerras House Democratic Caucus computers in anomalous ways:
<><> logging on as system administrators
<><> changing identities
<><> logging onto Cong Becerras server using 17 different user account credentials
<><> some credentials belonged to Democrat House members
<><> the Awans did not work for 9 of the 17 offices to which user accounts belonged.
<><> investigations found possible storage of sensitive House information outside the House
<><> Dropbox is installed on two Democratic Caucus computers used by the suspects
<><> user accounts had thousands of files in their Dropbox folder on each computer
<><> Using Dropbox is against House rules because it uploads files offsite.
<><> Wash/Po reported Based on the file names, some of the information is likely sensitive.
<><> post-awan clean up discovered many computer set-ups were little more than thin clients
<><> computer set-ups were portals to an outside computer.
<><> Awans were using terminal servers from a computer in a different location.
<><>Virtual Private Networks can make a servers hard drive appear to be local to a computer.
<><> remote sessions remained active for months at a time.
<><> data was always out of the members possession
<><> the Awans were using Becerras House Democratic Caucus as their central service warehouse.
<><> the Awans collectively logged onto Becerras Caucus system 5,735 times, avg 27 per day
<><> other offices were accessed less than 60 times.
<><> the pattern of login activity suggests steps were taken to conceal their activity
<><>aggregating multiple members data means all that data was absconded with
<><> L/E said Becerras entire Democratic Caucus server physically disappeared while being monitored by L/E.
<><> no scenario exists where the Awan clans access was appropriate
<><> House members are not allowed to accept services from people not on their payroll
<><> House employees are not permitted to log in to servers of members for whom they do not work.
<><> House policies are codified by law.
And what is ValJar doing these days? Or Holder? Or Lynch? Or Rice? Or Brennan? Or...
Wow, this sounds like a foreign intelligence operation not only compromising US intelligence activities, but also involving many Democrat members in the conspiracy.
HA HA HA HA HA!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.