Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2019 4:04:48 PM PST by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: huckfillary

Well, at least she believes that if she goes off the deep end, she should do so with a ney nonny nonny.


2 posted on 01/24/2019 4:13:18 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Well, at least she believes that if she goes off the deep end, she should do so with a hey nonny nonny.


3 posted on 01/24/2019 4:13:35 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Marxist socialism is not a credible system. It dismisses the entire idea of Christian love. It assumes that people become rich merely wishing to be selfish. But that doesn’t have to be so at all.

And if I am poor, I am very glad to have a job for a rich man, and even more so, a rich and generous man. I do not care if he is a trillionaire. God bless him with his trillion dollars.


4 posted on 01/24/2019 4:16:55 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods. It doesn’t matter if you want them for yourself, your other neighbor, or the government.


5 posted on 01/24/2019 4:17:00 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Capitalism produces EVERYTHING socialists wish to “redistribute.”

The minute socialists succeed in destroying capitalism is the minute they run out of things to “redistribute.”


9 posted on 01/24/2019 4:22:45 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats decide only elections they win are valid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

The man who gets to decide who has money and how much, is your king.


10 posted on 01/24/2019 4:24:59 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary
An examination of the history of nations reveals the long and arduous struggle by human beings for individual liberty--from kings, from masters, from whatever description fitted those other human beings who gained power and exercised it over their fellow citizens, disavowing the Creator-endowed rights of those fellows.

By whatever semantic maneuver those power holders chose to identify themselves, no matter how benevolent they purported to be, the end was the same: some individuals in the society or group were denied their Creator-endowed rights to be free.

In America, in the Year 1776, a genius group of freedom loving individuals declared a set of principles by which, if accepted, a society of like-minded individuals could enjoy "the pursuit of happiness."

Eleven years later, they "constituted" a form of self-government to assure that the goals of their Constitution's Preamble were to become reality for the nation.

The Preamble began with the words,

We, the People. . . .

The goal, of course, was the expansion, or enlargement, of liberty for individuals in the society--not the enlargement of government!

Perhaps Donald Trump's greatest achievement to this point can be described as one man's effort to "expand liberty" for individuals and to "contract government power," thereby allowing just a little individual freedom to flourish as it did in America both prior to 1776 and thereafter.

By the way, has anyone here read Burke's Speech on Conciliation. . . . lately? If not, please read his description of how the "spirit of liberty" among the colonists, even before 1776, had resulted in the American colonies literally "feeding" the Old World!

The word, "liberty," should, once again become the watchword for American citizens.

11 posted on 01/24/2019 4:31:04 PM PST by loveliberty2 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Make an effort, get a reward.

That’s what is moral.

Socialism doesn’t believe that and is immoral, period.


16 posted on 01/24/2019 6:08:27 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Socialism is based solely on envy.


17 posted on 01/24/2019 6:09:42 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huckfillary

Capitalism: amoral. Can be used well or ill.

Socialism: immoral. Cannot be used well.


18 posted on 01/25/2019 12:47:59 AM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson