Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Luther King was no prophet of unity. He was a radical
The Guardian ^ | 21 Jan 2019 | Bhaskar Sunkara

Posted on 01/21/2019 8:22:14 AM PST by NobleFree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: NobleFree

What ever he was, he was charismatic and he said things that hurt the race baiter industry. The left doesn’t like the real MLK any better than they like the real Kennedy. Only blatant rebranding has made them icons of the left.


41 posted on 01/21/2019 9:38:04 AM PST by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects; starve the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

The message of non-violence and the exhortation for “content of character” belie radicalism. He may have believed in some of the commie stuff (From each according to his ability, to each according to his need which sounds nice until you learn that faceless bureaucrats and elitist leaders decide what you need and what you owe) but true commies have never espoused non-violence.


42 posted on 01/21/2019 9:39:42 AM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Midnitethecat

Definition of Irony: All government welfare programs are closed on MLK Day.


43 posted on 01/21/2019 9:42:54 AM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
King said nothing that people of goodwill didn't already believe.

But others had not even thought about. May have changed some hearts.

44 posted on 01/21/2019 9:44:58 AM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
Do we want to die on the hill of MLK was a socialist, aldulterer, etc.?

Who here has advocated that? My point is simply that those who pontificate about "Disneyification" and the-whole-truth are hypocrites in not actually telling the whole truth. As has been pointed out in this thread, we all agree on the ideals of nondiscrimination and equal opportunity of which MLK spoke so stirringly; that doesn't mean everything he said or did was right, and those who would so argue need to be hoist on their own petard.

45 posted on 01/21/2019 9:52:32 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
As he put it in 1967: “We aren’t merely struggling to integrate a lunch counter now. We’re struggling to get some money to be able to buy a hamburger or a steak when we get to the counter.”

That's not necessarily socialistic. It could represent a desire to get people back to work.

King was moving with his time. Where he would have gone after the Sixties were over isn't something we'll ever know.

46 posted on 01/21/2019 9:53:11 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

I’d love to see J. Edgar’s REVDOCMLKJR dossier published.


47 posted on 01/21/2019 9:59:31 AM PST by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x
That's not necessarily socialistic.

But this is: "We are demanding an emergency program to provide employment for everyone in need of a job, or if a work program is impractical, a guaranteed annual income at levels that sustain life in decent circumstances. It is now incontestable that the wealth and resources of the United States make the elimination of poverty absolutely practical."

48 posted on 01/21/2019 10:05:01 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: VietVet876

Lots of folks believe James Earl Ray was framed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACTFJPjXMaM


49 posted on 01/21/2019 10:14:21 AM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Jim Crow needed to die. It had a lot of blind support and it took a very special kind of man to bring it down.

His death broke the back of racism in America. Accuse him of anything you want. God uses who he uses.


50 posted on 01/21/2019 10:19:17 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

BHO’s, without a doubt. Not even close.


51 posted on 01/21/2019 10:22:00 AM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Or Fredrick Douglas or Thurgood Marshall.


52 posted on 01/21/2019 10:22:53 AM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Pisses me off that we had to bundle the presidents birthdays for this womenizer


53 posted on 01/21/2019 10:42:23 AM PST by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

He was a radical however the idea of a society where people are judged on merit and not their skin color is worth pursuing. However the modern left are its biggest enemy.

The modern left wants a society where people are given points for being minorities, women, gay, transgender etc And whites especially heterosexual males and christians are given demerits.

The modern left are minority supremacists.


54 posted on 01/21/2019 11:53:14 AM PST by Cubs Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

“I am now convinced that the simplest approach will prove to be the most effective – the solution to poverty is to abolish it directly by a now widely discussed matter: the guaranteed income… The curse of poverty has no justification in our age. It is socially as cruel and blind as the practice of cannibalism at the dawn of civilization, when men ate each other because they had not yet learned to take food from the soil or to consume the abundant animal life around them. The time has come for us to civilize ourselves by the total, direct and immediate abolition of poverty.” – Where do We Go from Here?, 1967.


55 posted on 01/21/2019 12:19:57 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom

Just was at the birthday celebration of MLK at Dexter Baptist Church where he launched the bus boycott. He would have been 90 today. They are still preaching love and non-violence at that church.


56 posted on 01/21/2019 1:28:10 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marron

“His death broke the back of racism in America.”

And yet, people continue to be hired, promoted, and kept out of certain jobs and schools because of the color of their skin.

The federal government insists on this; and the Supreme Court often approves.

In fact, the Supreme Court disapproves of gerrymandering political districts - unless it is for the purpose of ensuring politicians of a certain color get elected.


57 posted on 01/21/2019 2:44:49 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Thank you!

I refuse to honor MLK, just as I refuse to honor JFK.

There are plenty of Americans more worthy of honor than those two plagiarists and adulterers.


58 posted on 01/21/2019 3:04:55 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

I don’t care what else he did or preached,
the axiom of judging others by the content of their character and not the color of their skin
struck me and stuck with me as being an obvious truth.


59 posted on 01/21/2019 3:38:59 PM PST by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
Because we accept that axiom, the Left says we must also accept his socialist ideas ... but they don't say (yet) that we must accept plagiarism and adultery.
60 posted on 01/21/2019 4:25:21 PM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson