Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Mueller final report will a dud because there was never anything to investigate.

When the report isn't made public, Democrats will accuse Mueller (their hero) of a cover-up.

This will not be the end but a continuation.

1 posted on 01/21/2019 8:02:50 AM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yesthatjallen

Rules are rules. When an investigation uses a Grand Jury, the proceedings and “report” is secret unless and until an indictment is issued. If no indictment, then it remains secret and sealed.


2 posted on 01/21/2019 8:10:42 AM PST by shalom aleichem (Fire Rod and Mueller and any other rat or snake. Shutter the press room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

It will not be made public, as per Mueller’s desires, because it will contain nothing having to with what its main purpose was supposed to have been.

This will spawn charges of a cover-up by the MSM.


3 posted on 01/21/2019 8:12:08 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I want it public. If it is not made public, the excuse will be national security secrets.

I want the FISA documents public. I want it all out there in black and white.

Secrecy will only aid the democrats and liberals.


4 posted on 01/21/2019 8:12:30 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

If it’s not public, you can be sure “anonymous sources” will confirm to CNN/MSNBC/... that all of the worst things they think about Trump are true and then some.


5 posted on 01/21/2019 8:13:21 AM PST by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
The Democrats won't want the report made public if it's a "dud".

Its analogous to to that meeting between Pence, Trump, Pelodi, and Schumer. Pelosi and Schumer didn't want the media there. And in a later meeting without the media, immediately after Schumer ran to the cameras and gave an account that others present denied happening.

In other words, if the Mueller report is a dud and contradicts "the narrative", Democrats would want it buried so they can claim something that just isn't so.

6 posted on 01/21/2019 8:13:29 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Dems should be very careful what they ask for.

They might get it........................


7 posted on 01/21/2019 8:13:55 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This was never anything but a political exercise. We can be sure of one thing only, the “report” will be used for maximum effect by the Democrats. If there is nothing in it that can be perceived as damaging to the President, it will be trickled out in ways that imply that it is. This is what we are seeing with Buzzfeed and the rest of the Democrat controlled media.


8 posted on 01/21/2019 8:14:09 AM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Diane Feinstein sez: “I served for a long time on the Intelligence Committee, and I know redaction can be excessive.”

Blind squirrel time. Although she didn't mean it, this applies in spades to the documents grudgingly supplied in response to subpoenas issued the FBI, DOJ and other bad players by Congressional and Senate committees. And all with the intent to hide what these bad players did.

10 posted on 01/21/2019 8:15:55 AM PST by DJ Frisat (Hey - what happened to my clever tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Tell me this is a joke


11 posted on 01/21/2019 8:17:30 AM PST by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Mueller will indite Trump. That decision was made *before* the “investigation” started. The investigation itself is just for pretense. The crux of the inditement will be redacted, to protect FBI “methods and procedures”, which is to say the FBI coup against Trump.


13 posted on 01/21/2019 8:18:15 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The Mueller Report = cover page and 1 blank page


15 posted on 01/21/2019 8:24:04 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
The "debate" will be over how much exculpatory information that helps Trump will be revealed.

I saw an intriguing article yesterday that said that Democrats will launch impeachment proceedings as soon as Ginsburg steps down to try to prevent Trump from nominating her replacement. The idea is to slow walk impeachment into 2020, and then claim the "Biden Rule" to stop Trump from making a nomination. This strategy relies on Republicans to back Democrat calls that Trump shouldn't nominate while impeachment is underway.

Two major impediments to this strategy are:

  1. Impeachment, by its very nature, suggests an imminent threat to the country by the President, who must be removed without haste. To then slow-walk such a process in order to delay a SCOTUS nomination for a year is counter to the sense of urgency that impeachment brings.
  2. A Mueller report that shows that the underlying suspicions that launched the probe were false, namely collusion with Russian agents by the Trump campaign, will only serve to undermine the causes for impeachment. Any secondary findings of a process nature will not rise to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors" warranting impeachment.
It's clear that Democrats can't allow the Mueller report to help Trump in any way against impeachment, because they need impeachment as a last-ditch ploy to stop a conservative replacement on the Supreme Court for Ginsburg.

-PJ

18 posted on 01/21/2019 8:27:56 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

MUELLER IS THERE TO COLLECT $$$ AND TO COVERUP AND HIDE EVIDENCE OF CLINTON/OBAMA CRIMES.

HE KNOWS THERE IS NO ‘RUSSIA COLLUSION’- SO THEY ARE ON ENDLESS FISHING TRIPS FOR TRIVIAL CRIMES AND PERJURY TRAPS, AND I BET THEY ARE FINDING AND DESTROYING EVIDENCE AGAISNT HILLIARY/OBAMA/THEMSELVES.


20 posted on 01/21/2019 8:33:10 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Rosenstein is headed out, and a new AG is coming in, so Muller will no longer have protection. A bunch of Muller’s attack dogs have left, leaving a skeleton crew.

If they had something on Trump, they would have indicted by now.


21 posted on 01/21/2019 8:38:58 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
My 2 cents is that the report will be nebulous.

It will say we found nothing but there could be something. That will throw the whole issue into the political theater of the House.

25 posted on 01/21/2019 8:59:12 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Feinstein can vote no like the rest of her comrades.

It is up to the DOJ, not Congress.

If she doesn’t like it, she can do her job and change the law.


26 posted on 01/21/2019 9:00:17 AM PST by marajade (Skywalker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Legal experts say whatever Mueller produces will likely be scrubbed to conceal sensitive national security information deep state lies.

Fixed. At least that is the only other reason I can think of why it wouldn't be made public, the main reason being there's nothing in it and it must be up to the MSM to convince us there is a there, there.

28 posted on 01/21/2019 9:07:16 AM PST by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

With all the hype about this “investigation” it has to be made public. Otherwise we are no different from major dictatorships or communists.


30 posted on 01/21/2019 9:11:29 AM PST by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson