Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Congress has given every president — including even President Donald Trump — the power to declare a national emergency under various statutes including under 50 U.S.C. 1621 and 50 U.S.C. 1622. Ever heard that a president declared a national emergency because massive tornadoes struck a rural town or a hurricane hit New York City or there are wildfires in California? Those are routine declarations of emergencies.

But there must be specific laws that get “switched on” under a presidential declaration. This does not allow a president just to make things up out of whole cloth. This does not give a president any power to enact legislation or create any new rules. It only activates what is already written in laws already passed by Congress and signed into law in the past.

A president is required to identify which existing legislation he or she is activating in the text of the emergency declaration. A declaration of an emergency is not something that can just be pulled out of the blue sky. It is tied to specific legislation.

Existing laws give Trump the authority to “reprogram” money appropriated for the U.S. Department of Defense to construction of some or all of a border wall along our nations’ international border with Mexico. The most directly applicable is 33 U.S. Code § 2293 “Reprogramming during national emergencies.” Other statutes include 10 U.S. Code §2803 and 10 U.S. Code §2808.

In fact, there are more than 100 statutes that are triggered when a president declares a national emergency, writes Elizabeth Goiten, Co-Director for Liberty & National Security for the Brennan Center. Those are statutes passed by Congress.

Under existing statutes and his powers as President, Trump could use some of the $700 billion appropriated for the military one year ago in the very large and controversial omnibus spending bill. At the time, a year ago, Trump was already hinting (repeatedly) that he agreed to such a large spending bill specifically because some of that money could build a border wall.

Second, Congress has already voted that here shall be a barrier the entire length of the U.S. – Mexico border. Trump’s border wall has already been authorized. But more than that, a border wall is mandatory. It is not optional. It is not maybe. It is required.

In 2006, Congress enacted and President George W. Bush signed into law, the Secure Fence Act of 2006. That is the official determination of both the U.S. Congress and the Commander in Chief. Therefore, Trump would be acting to see to it that the existing law be faithfully executed.

Despite the word “fence” in the title, the law does not necessarily mandate a “fence.” The wording of the Act requires a barrier customized to the particular terrain in each location to the extent necessary to “the prevention of all unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband.” So the Secure Fence Act of 2006 requires building “whatever it takes” — not a “fence” per se.

1 posted on 01/14/2019 8:13:47 AM PST by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moseley
Freep this poll

And the survey at American Thinker web site:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/01/free_speech_is_dead_in_canada_the_persecution_of_christian_activist_bill_whatcott.html

Should President Trump send troops to the border to stop the caravan?

Yes 92% (13,436)

No 7% (1,083)

Not sure 1%

2 posted on 01/14/2019 8:17:58 AM PST by spokeshave2 (https://www.gofundme.com/TheTrumpWall.... $20,492,131 of $1.0B goal by 343,356 people in 28 days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

He just needs to enumerate all of Obama’s ‘States of Emergency’ and he will get the People to support it.

Big Media is giving the Dems total cover.....the People need to be informed of the truth!


3 posted on 01/14/2019 8:19:32 AM PST by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

I suppose it could be like the use of force procedures. Require some Congressional authorization after the fact.

You can see how well that has worked in stopping Presidents from ordering war.


4 posted on 01/14/2019 8:21:14 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

The biggest takeover of private power was by FDR during the depression and WW II. President Trump would be using 0.1% of the power that FDR grabbed 75 years ago.


5 posted on 01/14/2019 8:22:16 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Trumps already been replacing the word “wall” with alternatives including “whatever” so as to possibly un-trigger the pansies, but I think more likely to ridicule the semantics game the left is playing.


6 posted on 01/14/2019 8:23:00 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Socialism is for losers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

After the government’s been shut down a year Trump should declare a “National Emergency”... That way the Court’s -like the 9th - will step in to stop it. The law will be debated making it much harder for democrats’ to abuse the law in the future.


7 posted on 01/14/2019 8:24:03 AM PST by GOPJ (Replace furloughed government workers with illegals for ten bucks an hour. Show dems how it feels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

It doesn’t matter what Trump does or doesn’t do. The Rats will declare a national emergency whenever they feel like it.


8 posted on 01/14/2019 8:28:43 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

FNC reported the other day that even Pres. Carter still has two active national emergencies that are ongoing.


12 posted on 01/14/2019 8:38:32 AM PST by marajade (Skywalker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

“Article 4, Section 4 offers no discretion or decision by the U.S. Government. A response is mandatory. Border incursions by violent drug smugglers, terrorists, and other criminals are the primary issue here. The U.S. Government is Constitutionally required to secure the borders. The Texas legislature should invoke Article 4, Section 4 by voting for an official request. President Trump would be acting pursuant to a constitutional obligation to defend the border.”

Excellent article and worthy suggestion for Texas or any state really, because citizens in every state are being put at risk by our porous suthern border.


13 posted on 01/14/2019 8:50:32 AM PST by unlearner (War is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Like the Dems would only do that if Trump did it first. Stupid premise.
Besides we've had dozens of States Of Emergency declared, so hardly a precedent.
15 posted on 01/14/2019 8:57:29 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the Left, The truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

“President Obama seems ready to work around Congress in 2014, telling reporters before his first Cabinet meeting of the year Tuesday that he stood ready to use two tools, a pen and a phone, to provide help for Americans.”

When he said this, what a great American.

When Trump says he can go around Congress, what a traitor.


17 posted on 01/14/2019 9:04:05 AM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Keep an open border will only allow more caravans, and they won’t just be from south of the border, they will flood in by ship from other countries.
But of course its already happening, the media suppresses that.


18 posted on 01/14/2019 9:12:19 AM PST by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

the us has declared 58 national emergencies since 1979- 31 still remain in effect-


20 posted on 01/14/2019 9:27:33 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Precedent is meaningless. Democrats always do whatever they want when they are in power regardless of what Republicans have done or refrained from doing.


21 posted on 01/14/2019 10:16:38 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

It would set a dangerous precedent but we are in perilous times.


22 posted on 01/14/2019 11:36:07 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

It’s not TRUMP’S border wall, it’s THE PEOPLE’S border wall. It’s one of the reasons we elected him.


23 posted on 01/14/2019 1:15:01 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson