Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK; rockrr; DiogenesLamp; FLT-bird

“But no Founder and no Founding document ever claimed an unlimited “right of secession” at pleasure.”

That is an interesting comment.

What, exactly, did the founding document say about “at pleasure.”


1,204 posted on 02/20/2019 5:07:43 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
jefersondem: That is an interesting comment. What, exactly, did the founding document say about “at pleasure.”

As always the PC Revisionists have it exactly backwards. They seem to come at it from the belief that the state's powers flow from the federal and that barring an express grant of power by the federal government to the state governments then the states don't have it. Wrong! Its exactly the opposite. Barring an express grant of power from the states to the federal then the federal does not have it. Nowhere is the federal government given the power to prevent secession nor are any conditions put on when a state may exercise its right to secession.

1,205 posted on 02/20/2019 5:31:13 PM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1204 | View Replies ]

To: jeffersondem
jeffersondem: "What, exactly, did the founding document say about 'at pleasure.' "

There was nothing "at pleasure" about the Declaration.

1,212 posted on 02/21/2019 3:33:24 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson