As always the PC Revisionists have it exactly backwards. They seem to come at it from the belief that the state's powers flow from the federal and that barring an express grant of power by the federal government to the state governments then the states don't have it. Wrong! Its exactly the opposite. Barring an express grant of power from the states to the federal then the federal does not have it. Nowhere is the federal government given the power to prevent secession nor are any conditions put on when a state may exercise its right to secession.
“As always the PC Revisionists have it exactly backwards.”
I have that concern too.
However, Brother Joe makes reference to the phrase “at pleasure” frequently and knowing him he will be boiling in here any minute with multiple citations - book, chapter and verse - conjoining “at pleasure” to the founding document.
Nonsense.
FLT-bird: "They seem to come at it from the belief that the state's powers flow from the federal and that barring an express grant of power by the federal government to the state governments then the states don't have it.
Wrong! "
More nonsense.
Our Founders considered "disunion" acceptable under two, but only two conditions:
FLT-bird: " Nowhere is the federal government given the power to prevent secession nor are any conditions put on when a state may exercise its right to secession."
Nor did Democrat President Buchanan take any steps to stop secession or prevent the Confederacy forming.
Even President Lincoln took no military action against Confederates until after they provoked, started, declared & began to wage war against the United States.