feh...
Posted on 01/07/2019 11:29:58 AM PST by detective
The Weekly Standard was a worthwhile publication. Unfortunately its rebirth as The Bulwark is set to be a good deal uglier with a radical leftist funder notorious for his backing of terrorist propaganda and anti-Semitism.
A handful of writers and editors who worked at The Weekly Standard, the now-defunct conservative magazine that was deeply critical of President Donald Trump until its sudden demise in December, have a new home.
Starting Monday, Bill Kristol, a co-founder of The Weekly Standard, and Charlie Sykes, the former talk radio host and conservative commentator, will beef up The Bulwark, a conservative website that has until now served as an aggregator for Kristol's non-profit group, the Defending Democracy Together Institute.
"The Bulwark was an aggregator," Sykes told CNN in a phone interview Friday. "We are going to turn it into a full-fledged opinion news website, with really the core digital staff of The Weekly Standard."
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
The Weekly Standard’s 5 readers will be reduced to 2 or 3 now.
——the core digital staff of The Weekly Standard.”——
Does that include Fred Barnes and Steve Hayes?
Will they gather up Jonah Goldberg and start a new blog?
My thought exactly, might as well just call it The Blue Oyster Bar...
“My thought exactly, might as well just call it The Blue Oyster Bar...”
Where “Repubican” Rep. Peter King is the bouncer!
“The article is difficult to follow but the main point is that Kristol and his core group of Trump hating fake conservatives are being paid...”
Kristol & Co. have NO principles that haven’t or won’t be betrayed...so long as they get paid.
Thanks ever so much, Billy, for revealing yourself. BTW, your father would be ASHAMED of you, and is currently spinning at about 10,000 RPM in his grave.
Is this enemy islamist an American citizen? If not, I'd term this sedition.
No.
Cool. They can call it the “Weekly Call To Prayer”.
If you want to have handy for constitutionally-illiterate Progressives who may call this a "democracy," then you want to read that Address.
Today, in 2018, when confronted with a decision between individual freedom and slavery, otherwise known as liberty and tyranny, Americans who prefer freedom must be armed with ideas and principles which are "self-evident" and plain. Otherwise, they cannot fend off the onslaught of the "counterfeit ideas" of Progressive ideologues.
When America's Founders and Framers of their Constitution wanted to convince ordinary farmers and citizens of the merits of a written "People's" Constitution to limit the powers of those to whom they entrust the powers of government, they published and circulated 85 essays, known as THE FEDERALIST.
It's time for citizens, once again, to examine those strong and clear words of Madison Hamilton, and Jay. They are just as clear for today's audience as they were then. Circulate the following excerpts to your friends. Even the least politically savvy will "get" Madison's meaning, especially in light of the power grab now going on in Washington. After all, THE FEDERALIST was the Framers' authoritative explanation of their Constitution, and directed by the Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia in 1825 to be used as the text for its law school in its studies of "the general principles of liberty and the rights of man," and said by Jefferson to "constitute 'the general opinion of those who framed, and of those who accepted the Constitution of the U.S., on questions as to its genuine meaning.'":
"The house of representatives... can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as the great mass of society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates between them that communion of interest, and sympathy of sentiments, of which few governments have furnished examples; but without which every government degenerates into tyranny." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"Such will be the relation between the House of Representatives and their constituents. Duty gratitude, interest, ambition itself, are the cords by which they will be bound to fidelity and sympathy with the great mass of the people." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"If it be asked what is to restrain the House of Representatives from making legal discriminations in favor of themselves and a particular class of the society? I answer, the genius of the whole system, the nature of just and constitutional laws, and above all the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America, a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"An elective despotism was not the government we fought for; but one in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among the several bodies of magistracy as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being effectually checked and restrained by the others." - Federalist Papers, No. 58, 1788
"This power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people, for obtaining a redress of every grievance, and for carrying into effect every just and salutary measure." - Federalist Papers, No. 58, 1788
"The propensity of all single and numerous assemblies (is) to yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions, and to be seduced by factious leaders into intemperate and pernicious resolutions." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788
"Every new regulation concerning commerce or revenue; or in any manner affecting the value of the different species of property, presents a new harvest to those who watch the change and can trace its consequences; a harvest reared not by themselves but by the toils and cares of the great body of their fellow citizens. This is a state of things in which it may be said with some truth that laws are made for the few not for the many." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788
"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788
Note particularly the following words of wisdom from Federalist No. 63, and take heart. You are doing what you were meant to do when you speak out on intrusions on your liberty. According to Madison:
"As the cool and deliberate sense of the community ought, in all governments, and actually will, in all free governments, ultimately prevail over the views of its rulers; so there are particular moments in public affairs when the people, stimulated by some irregular passion, or some illicit advantage, or misled by the artful misrepresentations of interested men, may call for measures which they themselves will afterwards be the most ready to lament and condemn. In these critical moments, how salutary will be the interference of some temperate and respectable body of citizens, in order to check the misguided career, and to suspend the blow meditated by the people against themselves, until reason, justice, and truth can regain their authority over the public mind?" - Federalist Papers, No. 63, 1788
I don’t see how something called The Bulwark represents a “rebirth” of The Weekly Standard under any circumstance ... article is pure clickbait bullshit ...
The “BulwarK” will be an insult to Conservatives, since it assumes Conservatives are gullible enough or unprincipled enough to support an enterprise underwritten by “a radical leftist funder notorious for his backing of terrorist propaganda and anti-Semitism.”
Sad. These asshats have, and are giving we beleaguered conservatives a bad name at a time we need all the help we can get what with the MSM, Tech wealth, International Globalist wealth, Socialist/Democrats (redundant) totally against us.
Kristol, and Sykes teaming up with Terrorists against the interests of the USA. Sounds like something deserving of a noose.
And by “hooking up,” I literally mean that with the persons involved.
I would venture to say if anybody had any doubts about the scuttlebutt of Mr. Kristol, and company that Mr. Kristol is certainly clearing them all away.
The bottom line is the Weekly Standard will surface unchanged but under new owners.
And as predictable as the sunset, lib media is promoting how ‘bold’ and ‘challenging’ this new re-org will be. Because, you know they love conservative news sites and promoting them ... yeah.
Looking back at it all now with a clear eye, it’s preposterous to think that Kristol was ever anything but a nut lefty liar but he’d made his bed with the GOP and the Bushes and Quayles and had to pretend to get subscribers to earn money and a living. Its all been a big lie. Cruise Director Conservatism and John McCain and George Will and all the rest - it’s just a great big gigantic lie.
a “conservative” website? Not likely.
feh...
They were good for one edition. The first. Since then they have consistently moved to the left
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.