Posted on 01/04/2019 9:27:46 AM PST by Kaslin
like most of the gop establishment, Mitt likes to lose graciously. Trump fights, they do not even put up a mild struggle.
Did anyone really expect anything different from Mitt Romney?
Trump has to stop endorsing these Swamp Creatures.
"The so-called "testy" and unpresidential interview response on Fox follows several others in the past.What could have been a "teaching moment" for youth on the merits of freedom of individual enterprise and liberty, turned into a petty self-focus and plays right into Obama's campaign narrative on the 1% for an Obama-Romney fight.
Romney's campaign words focus on issues, without grounding in principles.
Will some supporter of Romney provide real examples from his own words, prior to this campaign, which provide proof that he has incorporated the principles underlying our Declaration of Independence and Constitution into his speeches and actions over the past several decades?
If not, then what is it that makes them believe Romney to be the most qualified candidate to take on an incumbent President whose entire adult life has been dedicated to the principles of redistribution and government rule over people?
It's one thing to argue about issues. Anyone can do that.
What's required between now and November is a patriot who can articulate, explain, and defend the principles essential to freedom for individuals in a society.
That's why ordinary people are not convinced that Romney should be the one person standing between their grandchildren's imminent descent into slavery to government, as opposed to a new day of freedom for rising generations.
Oh, how we need a Washington or a Jefferson!
Nothing seems to have changed as it pertains to Romney's potential for leadership in Constitutional principle--just "testy" responses and sound bites for TV!
While perhaps not Washington or Jefferson, Trump does seem to understand that government and government officials are not sufficient barriers against tyranny. "The People" and their engagement are essential to preserving that liberty.
Yeah, when I saw this title, I thought “Et Tu” implies that you get stabbed in the back, you expected something different...a friend, ally, supporter, protector, etc.
Nobody ever said “Et Tu, Flake” or “Et Tu, McCain”...
We freepers have to ignore this loser. He has to be marginalized.
Of interest is even WoPo had a hit piece out against this jerk. Seems hardly anyone is supporting this loser.
Back in 2012 it was put out that this guy helped get Staples going, which is where I buy most office supplies. I can’t go near the place anymore.
“Et tu” should be reserved for a surprise traitor who stabs you in the back. A continuous GOP traitor like Mitt does not deserve that phrase as backstabbing is his modus operandi.
The “Et tu” line usually is applied to someone who was on your side initially. Mitt was never on Trump’s side, notwithstanding Mitt groveling for Trump’s endorsement several times.
Milquetoast Mitt.
How about “iterum Brutus?”
Again, Brutus?
PRESIDENT Trump has to stop endorsing these Swamp Creatures.
I hope he gets it.
Mitt is heaping egg on his face, what a turd.
Willard The Loser.
Do you feel lucky, punk?
Well, do you?
That’s more like it!
Et tu Mittae was the first thing that came mind when I heard the report. Back stabbing lying POS.
“Romney is previously known for playing the role of Brutus in the play Julius Caesar.”
Bwahahahahahaaaa!!! Man this guy is getting it from all over....
Treasonous SOB selling out Americans again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.