Facebook is evil. Get off of the platform.
I look forward to the day when Facebook goes the way of AOL or Myspace.
[ What is psoriatic arthritis? Look for symptoms, causes & more What is psoriatic arthritis? Look for symptoms, causes & more ]
Yes censorship is like having arthritis, it aches all the damned time!
I was given a 2-day “timeout” on Gateway Pundit for pro-Conservative posts that were 100% accurate...and then they were removed.
1. FOX is now a “lite” version of MSNBC. @OANN is MUCH more Fair & Balanced!
2. Karl Marx’s 19th century cult of leftism, under all of its brand names, is a severe mental disorder and an inability to grasp reality.
3. Leftism, under all of its’ totalitarian brand names, has a record of massive failure - economically, morally & culturally.
In the 20th century, leftism was responsible for more than 250 MILLION deaths. For anyone to continue to believe in leftism is indicative of extraordinary intellectual stupidity, severe psychosis...or just pure evil.
4. On Nov 19, Joe diGenova stated Huber has NOT interviewed his/VT’s client, Douglas Campbell, the informant on Uranium 1 Bribery scandal. Huber, originally appointed by hussein44, should be taken with a YUGE grain of salt.
Where can we download and start looking through it?
I understand why we can’t yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater.
I understand why I can’t yell “I’m going to kill you!” to someone in a bar.
But aside from a few exceptions, Free Speech means I get to say stuff even if you wish I wouldn’t.
Now, if we looked at the Constitution as originally envisioned, only CONGRESS would be blocked from telling me what I can and cannot say. But I believe the Supreme Court broadened this. I think it’s wrong for Facebook to block people from expressing their opinions. Even if Facebook doesn’t like those opinions.
Facebook should be there to collect ad revenue. It should not be there to control and manipulate people’s thinking. But it is.
So when is Trump going to actually do something? If he can’t even protect his own supporters from being suppressed on the digital public square, how does he expect to win re-election?
“I’m in Facebook Jail for another 17 days for “hate speech”. Not allowed to be critical of a “protected class”, a 7th century cult!”
I actually said “Blacks are not STUPID ENOUGH to...”
Now, to me that doesn’t sound very racist, if anything, the opposite, but I got yelled out by these Fascists at Facebook.
I had read somewhere that Facebook, last year, was going to require everyone sign a ‘code of conduct’. That was going to be my ticket out - I wouldn’t do it.
But wouldn’t you know, no such luck.
Free commercials with every post ... a new feature on FR ...
So FB is also screening for psoriatic arthitis? Who knew?
Rules are simple: if it expresses a conservative or Christian point of view, its banned; if it criticizes anyone else’s point of view or even repeats, it it is banned.
All other points of view are welcome by the management in the name of fairness, free speech, and diversity in thought.
Rule Book? We don’t need no stinking rule book to ban conservatives!
nextdoor.com has a similar problem, but the censors tend to be local volunteers most if not all of whom turn out to be liberal, supported by the liberal nextdoor management which is in san francisco, and apparently accountable to no one else. the volunteers are apparently appointed for life and there is apparently no external or public review process. the result is that conservative and libertarian arguments are simply censored, especially if conservative or libertarian members seem to be winning in an online debate. with conservative and libertarian arguments censored, only the liberal arguments are allowed to stand, and thus only liberal arguments prevail by default.
However bad Fartbook is, Twitter is a billion times worse, I’ve been permanently banned from them 6 times with 6 separate accounts and all for giving an conservative POV to some crap a Marixst posted. I think what happens is the Marxists I respond to flags the response because they don’t have the balls to debate or accept facts, and the Marxists running Twitter take a look at what I wrote, see that it’s a conservative response with undeniable facts, and use that to permanently ban me. It’s not cursing, I never wrote curses anyway, and Keith Olbermann cursed his brains out as you can see here and never got banned.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DeYpdF3X4AYhFmR.jpg
Nope, they ban people SOLELY for being conservative and this is a publicly held company.
It should be considered a crime almost as heinous as his creepy pedo haircut.
I doubt this revelation will make a dimes worth of difference. If it’s reported by msm, the leaking, only, will be covered as a criminal act. Republicans may sputter and spark, but that’s probably as far as it will go.
Democracy (Encyclopedia Britannica film, circa 1946)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx25aMPvbJo
“The newspapers of a real democracy meet these tests...”
Newspaper checks.
1. Balance of coverage
2. Disclosure of source
3. Competence of staff
“A community is low on a ‘Respect’ scale if common courtesy is withheld from large groups of people on account of their political attitudes.”
“...in a downright despotism opposition is dangerous whether the despotism is official or whether it is unofficial...”
“A community rates low on the ‘Information’ scale when the press, radio, and other channels of communication are controlled by only a few people and when citizens have to accept what they are told.”
“See how a community trains its teachers”
“...these students are being taught to accept uncritically whatever they are told. Questions are not encouraged.”
“And if books and newspapers and the radio [and facebook and youtube and...] are officially controlled the people will read and accept exactly what the few in control want them to. Government censorship is one form of control. The newspaper that breaks the government censorship rule can be suspended. It is also possible for newspapers and other lines of communication to be controlled by private interests...”
How queer, I scanned through the Fox News article but there was no hyperlink to read the full document.
Why not?
So, a whistleblower leaks the document to the Times (the New York Times) and that liberal bastion of fake news releases it to the public? Huh? My math is working here.
