1 posted on
12/23/2018 7:17:38 PM PST by
digger48
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: digger48
I guess information will be shared on a “need to know” basis. And, apparently, Americans do not Need To Know how corrupt their government is.
2 posted on
12/23/2018 7:21:35 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: digger48
secret courts and now this garbage: sealed subpoenas going all the way to SCOTUS.
What we need is sunlight and a lot of it.
4 posted on
12/23/2018 7:23:07 PM PST by
proust
(Justice delayed is injustice.)
To: digger48
...The federal government has until Dec. 31st to respond
*********************************************
Would this be the federal government led by President Trump who the people elected as head of the executive branch or the federal government as represented by Mueller who was elected by a single person (I.e., the Deep State RAT Rosenstein)?
To: digger48
"firstSupreme Court case that would be sealed" Wew!
8 posted on
12/23/2018 7:27:02 PM PST by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: digger48
I guess I should really dig into the details, but the first thing that hits me is that the Supreme Court just issued two similar rulings: 1, it ruled in favor of illegal aliens, against the interests of Americans by upholding the stay on the President’s action to keep asylum applicants outside the country; 2, it ruled in favor of a foreign company and against American prosecutors (even if they are Mueller’s team).
Bottom line: who’s side is our Supreme Court on?
To: digger48
10 posted on
12/23/2018 7:28:35 PM PST by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
To: digger48
Star Chamber secret judicial proceedings were part of English history but dropped due to their serious abuses, etc. now we have secret court proceedings in USA ( fisa, etc, and now this?!) This is very very very serious, imho ,
11 posted on
12/23/2018 7:31:26 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
(“Politicians arent born, they’re excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: digger48
A mystery grand jury issues a mystery contempt order against a mystery foreign company for violating a mystery subpoena for not turning over mystery information.
Is it just me, or is this some weird Mad Libs game where Mueller gets to fill in the "mystery" at some point later when it suits his case?
-PJ
12 posted on
12/23/2018 7:33:34 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: digger48
Next, there will be a double secret subpoena.
15 posted on
12/23/2018 7:38:06 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: digger48
Thanks for posting. Bookmarking to follow more tomorrow.
17 posted on
12/23/2018 7:42:40 PM PST by
MarMema
(don't forget to stock up on dogfood)
To: digger48
18 posted on
12/23/2018 7:47:46 PM PST by
JPJones
(More tariffs, less income tax.)
To: digger48
My Comments Self Censored To Prevent Being Banned
19 posted on
12/23/2018 7:48:23 PM PST by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: digger48
This sounds good, if I’m interpreting it correctly.
Appears to be a rebuke to Mueller’s Nazis.
To: digger48
There is so little info about this case.
It appears that Mueller is again stepping out of bounds.
I look forward to seeing AAG Whitaker NOT going forward with the case. I pray he makes the correct decision.
I would love to be sure that Mueller’s days are numbered.
To: digger48
To: digger48
Did I miss the breakdown of the decision.
How did the Court rule?
To: digger48
This is ‘what they don’t want you to know about’.
To: digger48
Is making a ruling on a Sunday unusual? I would certainly think so.
48 posted on
12/23/2018 9:08:26 PM PST by
hsmomx3
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
52 posted on
12/23/2018 9:19:36 PM PST by
bitt
To: digger48
so why weren't deep staters who failed to comply with Congressional subpoenas fined $5000 a week/
54 posted on
12/23/2018 9:35:31 PM PST by
rolling_stone
(Hang em slowly don't boil the rope make it a little short...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson