Skip to comments.
Judge blocks Trump's asylum crackdown
The Washington Times ^
| December 19, 2018
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 12/19/2018 10:19:14 AM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
For everloving God’s sake— the ones who have already been deported are to be brought back.... for ‘’’Fairness’’’!!
What is this clown drinking. NO part of this has anything to do with existing immigration law... PERIOD.
22
posted on
12/19/2018 10:30:15 AM PST
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
Hell, I don’t think the courts would give me the same process rights they just gave to someone in Honduras.
And I was born in Ohio.
To: Wally_Kalbacken
Build the freaking wall!Worth repeating!
24
posted on
12/19/2018 10:31:15 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
Un-deport?? What are the mechanics of that? Go into another country, kidnap deported people, and bring them back?
Now may be a good time to start random drug testing Frederal judges.
25
posted on
12/19/2018 10:31:47 AM PST
by
OkiMusashi
(Beware the fury of a patient man. --- John Dryden)
To: OkiMusashi
lol.... or Federal judges.
26
posted on
12/19/2018 10:33:24 AM PST
by
OkiMusashi
(Beware the fury of a patient man. --- John Dryden)
To: jazusamo
A federal judge blocked the Trump administrations attempts to speed up deportations for people with bogus asylum claims, ruling Wednesday that the president and his team had gone beyond what Congress intended Sounds like CONGRESS should be the determinant of what they intended, with a remedy of altering the law if they feel it's not being implemented properly. Not some judge with an opinion of how it should be.
27
posted on
12/19/2018 10:35:17 AM PST
by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: OkiMusashi
or Frederal Frintstone judges.
28
posted on
12/19/2018 10:36:06 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
![](https://i0.wp.com/immigrationcourtside.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Image-8-9-18-at-3.12-PM.jpg?resize=285%2C171)
Da' judge has spoken. He hates YOU! He hates America.
To: jazusamo
WOW! The Deep State has gotten to Sullivan, big time! But, come to think of it, in the Senator Stevens case, the damage had already been done. Stevens was out of office and politically dead. So it cost Sullivan nothing to expose the government’s perfidy.
30
posted on
12/19/2018 10:38:52 AM PST
by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
To: jazusamo
No wall funding. No crackdown. Bad new.
31
posted on
12/19/2018 10:39:01 AM PST
by
tennmountainman
("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right")
To: Doogle; jazusamo
The rungs of this judges ladder started with Reagan, then H.W. Bush, and then Clinton.
What seems peculiar to me was the initial presentations on this by the judge, and now his presentation is totally opposite!?
I’d say the judge has been contacted by they whom we are not allowed to see.
32
posted on
12/19/2018 10:40:26 AM PST
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: jazusamo
33
posted on
12/19/2018 10:41:48 AM PST
by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: House Atreides
Or he was always like that. If Clinton liked him enough to put him on the federal bench, that says quite a lot.
34
posted on
12/19/2018 10:42:36 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: jazusamo
Security policy run by the judiciary.
The judiciary has its fingers in all facets of government now.
To: headstamp 2
Its “judge” Sullivan’s decision; let him enforce it.
36
posted on
12/19/2018 10:45:03 AM PST
by
laconic
To: rockinqsranch
I agree, something not good has happened to this judge.
37
posted on
12/19/2018 10:49:33 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: Reno89519
:: close the border for national security reasons ::
This seems the peculiar “fly in the ointment” because, once a national security emergency is declared, the courts have absolutely no power to stop it. CinC can move and direct DefFor anywhere and is NOT SUBJECT to any court action in doing so.
And, we have not yet rescinded the declaration of war made in 2002.
38
posted on
12/19/2018 10:50:49 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: edie1960
CLOSE DOWN THE BORDER ENTIRELY UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE!!!
It's already been ruled that is illegal.
To: blackdog
A few thousand pitchforks need to block this judges driveway.
Let us know how it goes once you get there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson