Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/19/2018 7:26:03 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

In what way?


2 posted on 12/19/2018 7:27:17 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Jenn has gone all over.

She’s nuts.


3 posted on 12/19/2018 7:27:30 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It is long past the time to challenge, confront, debunk and frankly, embarrass, adults who’d rather adopt some tribal identification than solve a pressing and all-too-real danger to the country.

The other day someone asked Rubin how she was a conservative. She refused to answer. But her columns speak volumes to the contrary.

4 posted on 12/19/2018 7:27:33 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

BS and very dangerous rhetoric.

Gun rights deniers are a very real and far more credible danger to our society and those of the WPs I’ll should be punished for trying to deny us those rights.


5 posted on 12/19/2018 7:27:49 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

80 years ago many Europeans decided people like Jennifer Rubin were a danger to their security; dangerous message here, not without precedent.


6 posted on 12/19/2018 7:28:14 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Isn’t she the house “conservative?”


7 posted on 12/19/2018 7:29:12 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Torquemada lives!...........................


8 posted on 12/19/2018 7:29:27 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Figuring out an excuse to unleash the FISA Court and NSA on us, eh?


9 posted on 12/19/2018 7:29:37 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well waht about this. https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/11/winter-is-coming-super-grand-solar-minimum.html

Professor Valentina Zharkova gave a presentation of her Climate and the Solar Magnetic Field hypothesis at the Global Warming Policy Foundation in October, 2018.

Zharkova models solar sunspot and magnetic activity. Her models have run at a 93% accuracy and her findings suggest a Super Grand Solar Minimum could begin in 2020.

A Super Grand Solar Minimum would have four magnetic fields out of phase. There was about 40-60 years of cold weather 350 years ago. This was a Maunder Minimum of lower solar activity. The historical cold weather had two magnetic fields out of phase.

Zharkova is predicting a cooling effect that is 2.5 to 4 times larger than the Maunder minimum. Zharkova’s analysis shows an 8 watts per square meter decrease in TSI (Total Solar Irradiance). A 2015 Nature study looked at 2 watts per square meter decrease causing a 0.13-degree celsius effect. A four times larger effect would be 0.5-degree celsius.

Zharkova believes the warming models are including the warming effect of increased solar activity. If she is correct there would be cooling and the warming models would be wrong.


10 posted on 12/19/2018 7:30:05 AM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What a stupid woman. Someone actually pays her to write articles like this?


12 posted on 12/19/2018 7:30:32 AM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I would say that “Climate-Change Accepters” are much larger danger to our security! They are willing to give up our sovereignty completely to protect their nonexistent theories and what has become their religion.


13 posted on 12/19/2018 7:32:31 AM PST by Bigbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
She is a climate cycle denier. I want her to look me in the face and tell me the earth will NEVER have another ice age because of CO2 levels rising(man made or natural). She, like all of them are nuts, bat guano crazy.
14 posted on 12/19/2018 7:32:39 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is what passes for journalism now.

In a sane world, a ridiculous, vacuous, imbecilic bitch like this would be pitied.

15 posted on 12/19/2018 7:32:46 AM PST by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If it is such rock solid science why is the article in the Opinions section?

.


16 posted on 12/19/2018 7:33:12 AM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Mizzzzz Rubin has ZERO idea what real danger is, but her seditious ilk keep poking at the tiger . . .


17 posted on 12/19/2018 7:33:20 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I worked outside my whole life. I know climate change is real.

In the summer it was hot. But then in the winter it got really cold. And it happened every friggen year.


18 posted on 12/19/2018 7:33:30 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And people who are “a danger to our security” must be prosecuted, and imprisoned if necessary. That’s the logical next step, isn’t it?


19 posted on 12/19/2018 7:34:17 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“in the face of overwhelming evidence” == onslaught of media propaganda.

The espionage of the soviet union was indeed undeniable, and didn’t even require modeling to “prove”. Just because the media says it’s settle science a billion times doesn’t make it true. A crappy metaphor about the cold war doesn’t make it true either.


21 posted on 12/19/2018 7:35:19 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oh goody...more ‘conservative’ commentary from WAPO’s resident ‘conservative’.


22 posted on 12/19/2018 7:35:32 AM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Good analogy Jennifer. Let’s talk about when we were terrified about a missile gap. It turned out we had something like 150 ICBMs. Today we know the USSR had a grand total of 4 missiles.

Global warming is fake news


23 posted on 12/19/2018 7:37:46 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson