Posted on 12/07/2018 2:25:28 PM PST by Theoria
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis was livid last month when he summoned top military officials to a video conference at the Pentagon to press them about an investigation into a 2017 ambush in Niger that killed four Americans on a Green Beret team. His anger, Pentagon officials said, came from seeing news reports that junior officers were being reprimanded for the botched Niger mission while the officers directly above them were not.
Days later, a senior officer who had largely escaped punishment was told he would be reprimanded. Another senior officers actions before and around the time of the mission were also under new scrutiny.
And this week, Capt. Michael Perozeni, a more junior officer who had received much of the public blame for the mission received word from the Army: His reprimand was rescinded.
The turnaround is evidence of the troubled search for accountability in an incident that left a small team of underequipped and poorly supported American soldiers in the African scrub to be overrun by fighters loyal to the Islamic State. More than a year after the ambush the American militarys largest loss of life in Africa since the 1993 Black Hawk Down debacle in Somalia top military leaders continue to battle over how to apportion blame and who should be held accountable.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Why do we have troops in Niger?
Our Special Forces need to be in Mexico - not Niger.
Mattis ... the buck stops there ...
Earlier reports that it’s mostly spec ops going after slavers.
Hmmm, guess they couldn’t find an enlisted person to throw in Leavenworth.
Careful with an extra g here people.
May God bless General Mattis with a long and prosperous life!
Sounds like they really tried to screw that captain though. He protested the mission. But followed orders. He seems to have fought heroically, but when everything blew up, the officers above him laid the blame on him.
Exactly. Why send troops when we have perfectly good planes with plenty of bombs. Bring back napalm and cluster bombs. Plus throw in a couple of tactical nuclear weapons for fun.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/22/us/politics/drone-base-niger.html
...In Niger alone, the Pentagon in the past few years has doubled the number of United States troops, to about 800 not to conduct unilateral combat missions, but to battle an increasingly dangerous Al Qaeda, the Islamic State and even loosely associated extremist groups with proxy forces and drone strikes...
Right there you know it wasn't the grunts who pay the piper at fault.
He may not be Vulcan, but he is sure very
t logical and truthfull.
Whenever I want understand military milieu, strategy, operations and logistics, I read the seditionist weeenies at the New York Times.
Who do I ring up to stop this stupid crap?
++++
Why...
America is an empire. We follow the orders from the global oligarchy. Thats why.
or Syria, or Turkey, or Iraq, or Afghanistan....ad nauseum.
Meanwhile, on the southern US border....
The few troops there are weaponless, erecting tents and slinging concertina wire.
More than a year after the ambush the American militarys largest loss of life in Africa since the 1993 Black Hawk Down debacle in Somalia
WTF, more than in engagements in Iraq or Afghanistan? This is the NYT today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.