Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The stomach-turning 'ballot-harvesting' that enabled Democrats to walk off with California
American Thinker ^ | 12/03/2018 | Monica Showalter

Posted on 12/03/2018 8:56:42 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The picture emerging from California's election is grotesque. How again did Democrats engineer their strange midterm victory in Orange County and in other traditionally Republican areas? In that election, apparently-winning Republican candidates were all unseated as the ballots just kept arriving, and arriving, and arriving, until the results flipped. Each and every time. And no such flips happened for Republicans, just Democrats, after Democratic operatives had enough information from televised results to know that Republicans were winning. Democrats say it's just 'counting all the votes.'

Welcome to ballot-harvesting.

The Daily Caller has an ace report with a video showing just how that's done:

Attorney Robert Barnes, on Twitter, noted just how problematic that new practice is:

 

Cali new law for 2018 election "allow anybody to walk into an elections office and hand over truckloads of vote by mail envelopes with ballots inside, no questions asked, no verified records kept. It amounts to an open invitation to large-scale vote buying, voter coercion" — Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) December 2, 2018

 

Which is why it's illegal almost everywhere in the world. California, on the other hand, back in 2016, passed AB1921, a law that actually permits it. Anyone can turn in ballots now, no questions asked, no chain of custody required. Back at the time, Democrats were hollering about low turnout and how getting more turnout was a priority, even though they were running a one-party state at that time, as they are now. They painted themselves as all concerned about 'democracy' given the low rates of turnout in their districts, many of which were known as 'rotten boroughs' full of non-citizen voters.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ballotfraud; ballotharvesting; california; electionfraud; elections; fraud; singlepartystate; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: GOP Poet

many of the GOP-e people do not care to win many elections.
their every action (and lack of action) proves this simple fact.

they are happy to just rubber-stamp or enable, or simply fail to resist (failure to repeal Obammycare, now the halt on normal judicial confirmations, etc.) the commie-leftist collectivization, taxation, and regulatory “initiatives”

designed to enslave and further exploit Americans.


21 posted on 12/03/2018 9:39:25 AM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; LS
Some around here chalk it all up to a messaging issue, where (R)'s just failed to make their case. I'm not buying it.

These same folks were not saying anything about failure in (R) messaging prior to the election, and in fact they predicted we'd hold the House by 5 on the low side. They had models, they had inside information on votes cast, they had electoral guru's who counted increases in post-2016 (R) registrations in some cases by hundreds-of-thousands of registrations (Pennsylvania) - the (D)'s "won" anyway.

I am not saying their numbers were wrong, but for them to have been accurate about any thing they predicted prior to the election, there is more to it than this johnny-come-lately nonsense about failure in messaging. Face it. It's fraud folks.

Broward and Miami/Dade Florida tried to do a 2000 electoral fraud re-do, but it was so blatant this time it was jaw dropping.

If failure in messaging was the problem, why wasn't "messaging failure" factored into the rosy estimates made by the gurus before the election?

We have a roaring economy that speaks for itself, and a president with balls who is winning everywhere else he inserts himself. And yet we lost the House, and the consolation prize now is "hey we only have to flip 18 to get the House back."

Those effected by the vote harvesting scam have to prepare a cleverly crafted case and run it up to the USSC that declares vote harvesting unconstitutional as well as strikes down any enabling legislation that allows such a thing to occur. Perhaps the DOJ getting electoral fraud convictions will place future fraudsters on notice.

Why not have Scott initiate an investigation in the Senate about this crap? Get DeSantis to file on the USSC brief as an electorial aggrieved albeit successful party. Get Kemp in Georgia in on the filing too along with all the other CA (R)'s who lost their seats to harvesting, and others who were also affected by this.

Get LS to testify in front of Scott's investigative committee about vote harvesting, the Maricopa shenanigans, and the reasons why Enema is his senator instead of McSally, when McSally was supposedly leading on election night in one of the supposedly more (R) states in the nation.

FReegards!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic

22 posted on 12/03/2018 9:40:05 AM PST by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

I agree that this is what the new Democrat Recorder allowed to happen in Maricopa County but I don’t agree that it is the reason that McSally got 10% fewer votes than Ducey. I may have made the difference State wide but McSally was a terrible candidate as we all knew she would be.


23 posted on 12/03/2018 9:43:24 AM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Like *Mail-In* ballots aren’t just as, if not MORE vulnerable to this type of fraud!

Yes, voting is completely within the purview of the states. However, can the fedgov not ADD stipulations regarding the electoral process in federal elections?

Or perhaps a CoS ONLY about voter requirements?


24 posted on 12/03/2018 9:51:06 AM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bkmk


25 posted on 12/03/2018 9:51:23 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

Call this “ballot harvesting” what it is, fraud, and bring the enabling statutes to the attention of the Supreme Curt. This is a violation of “one person, one vote”, as much of this “harvesting” was counting the provisional ballots WITHOUT comparing to determine if the vote had already been recorded for that individual in a timely manner.

It matters not that a state statute may exist, that statute is still unconstitutional, and ought to be struck down immediately. In fact, California should be required to hold a new election when it is declared to be not covered by any Constitutional basis.

California’s “jungle primary” is a joke, too.


26 posted on 12/03/2018 10:04:01 AM PST by alloysteel (To try and fail, that is glorious. To never try at all, that is ignominy, far worse than failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here again, the liberals have wrecked another institution of Constitutional government. This tactic bastardizes the voting process so badly it effectively destroys any reason for holding elections.


27 posted on 12/03/2018 10:14:58 AM PST by iontheball (TT'S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver; All
"Should be outlawed for federal elections - but no chance of that now."

Given that Pres. Trump’s institutionally indoctrinated constitutional “experts” haven’t properly advised him on this issue, patriots need to get word to Pres. Trump to consider that this practice is probably (imo) a violation of Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, and to do something about it.

Note that later-ratified voting rights amendments affect how Section 2 is interpreted.

28 posted on 12/03/2018 10:19:48 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity
Where's that election observer, Jiminy Cricket Carter, at when you need him?

He'd put a stop to this. /sarc/

29 posted on 12/03/2018 10:58:00 AM PST by HotHunt (Reagan was good but TRUMP IS GREAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need a federal measure against that.


30 posted on 12/03/2018 11:00:17 AM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTimeOfMan
when we fully enter in WROL

What is WROL?

31 posted on 12/03/2018 11:12:35 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
So what if you think McSally was a terrible candidate.

You make it sound like Sinema won because she was a better candidate. She stuck her foot in her mouth so many times before and during the campaign, I thought she must be related to Joe Biden. SHE was the terrible candidate herself.

What Republican in their right mind would vote for Sinema, a radical, uber-liberal democRAT, just because their own candidate, McSally, wasn't perfect?

None that I know of.

McSally won on election night. This ballot harvesting and other established voter fraud shenanigans the democRATS engage in, miraculously gave the election to the liberal in a right-leaning state afterwards.

I'm not buying it. They cheated like they have been caught doing all over the country.

32 posted on 12/03/2018 11:14:48 AM PST by HotHunt (Reagan was good but TRUMP IS GREAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

How do you explain the ten percent difference between Ducey and McSally.

How do you explain threats to not vote for McSally on FR?

I am not saying there was not cheating going on with ballots being picked up by Dem gangsters. But I am saying the fix is always in at the State level here for which candidates run on the Republican tickets.


33 posted on 12/03/2018 12:55:42 PM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

I agree. There is always fraud, but this year’s fraud exceeded everyone’s expectations. Fraud made the difference. The “extra” wins the ‘rats chalked up AFTER the election were just to rub our faces in it.


34 posted on 12/03/2018 2:13:33 PM PST by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thwse retarded leftist need to look at France today to see what their future looks like. Heads on pikes coming soon.


35 posted on 12/03/2018 2:29:10 PM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

Happy to. You might want to look at AZDataGuru’s precinct charts while you’re at it. Or listen to the callers to Mike Broomhead’s show-—all Rs who didn’t vote for McSally.


36 posted on 12/03/2018 3:09:59 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
Republicans are their own worst enemies.

They seem to always want purity in their candidates or they won't accept them.

The democRATS, on the other hand, don't care how bad their candidates are. They stand behind them, vote for them and then cheat if they have to to get them across the finish line.

We will continue to lose these elections to the democRATS because they fight dirty and we don't fight back at all.

Too many Republicans bailed an McSally and look what it got them. At radical liberal, commie. For Senator.

Even McPain or Flake would be better compared to Sinema. Anybody would be better than Sinema.

37 posted on 12/03/2018 7:23:50 PM PST by HotHunt (Reagan was good but TRUMP IS GREAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

WROL - without rule of law.


38 posted on 12/04/2018 7:27:37 AM PST by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TheTimeOfMan
WROL - without rule of law.

Thank you.

39 posted on 12/04/2018 8:17:55 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The stomach-turning 'ballot-harvesting' that enabled Democrats to walk off with California

I expect the GOP to respond in their usual manner, by doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

This is but a dry run on how the dems plan to steal the 2020 elections, including The Presidency!

40 posted on 12/05/2018 6:06:42 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty ('DEPLORABLE' Charter Member of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - and DAMN Proud of it!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson