“The researchers envisioned a fleet of just under 100 tankers flying just over 60,000 missions a year by the 15th year of the project. “
Bwahahahahahahaaaahahahahahaaa!!!!!
So chemtrails are nifty and A-OK now?
However, how much greenhouse gasses would 100 tanker flying 200 missions per day emit? Just enough to offset their cooling mission?
The most depressing aspect of this is that just about the time we stop these crazies dead in their tracks, permanently, there will be another and then another harebrained scheme for destroying the planet in the name of saving the planet.
Sounds like justification for contrails. I recall some years ago, spray underarm deodorant was a major contributor to global warming. These people need to be kept far from any political power.
So...we’ve graduated to advocating cartoon supervillainy?
OFFS! Just turn some lead in to gold will ya.
Instead of doing such a hair-brained idea, just resettle people along the Canadian border. I assure you, Minnesota has plenty of land and abundant cold weather!
And what would be the corrective action starting at year 12 if/when the assumptions used in this study prove to be false?
A replay on a massive level of the “World will Freeze (aka Global Cooling)”; The “World will dry up (aka Global Heating)” hysteria we have read about for the last 48 years (aka Earth Day # 1)?
Or, is it like all too many “scientific” studies an all or nothing project. Either it succeeds and we change the sun’s output? Increase and we burn. Decrease and we freeze.
Don’t think much of either option.
Just launch Michael moore, and he will cause another ice age from his ballooning ass