Posted on 11/25/2018 7:22:59 AM PST by Kaslin
William Rainford was not fired. He resigned.
Because of the controversy. For which he heartedly apologized.
After much prayer and discernment, Rainford wrote to Catholic University President John Garvey, Im submitting my resignation to you as Dean of the National Catholic School of Social Service, effective immediately. I do so with all good will for the University and School. Given the needs of the faculty and direction of the School, I believe a different academic leader is warranted.
Back in September, during the big national #MeToo civil war over the Senates confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Dean Rainford posted several controversial tweets.
Riddle me this, Rainfords since-deleted tweet asked. Why would the accuser of Kavanaugh take a polygraph, paid for by someone else and administered by private investigator in early August, if she wanted to remain anonymous and had no intention of reporting the alleged assault?
The tweet alluded to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who testified that she did not know who paid for the lie detector test she had taken months before her identity as a Kavanaugh accuser had been revealed. Her attorneys then claimed they simply ate the costs.
Nice attorneys.
Swetnick is 55 y/o. Kavanaugh is 52 y/o, began a now-removed tweet against another accuser. Since when do senior girls hang with freshmen boys? If it happened when Kavanaugh was a senior, Swetnick was an adult drinking with&by her admission, having sex with underage boys. In another universe, he would be victim & she the perp!
Interesting questions, which certainly made me think. But maybe thinking is overrated, because those inquiries apparently made others angry.
Over 40 graduate social work students walked out of classes Thursday afternoon following a tweet from Dean Will Rainford . . . reported The Tower, an independent student newspaper at Catholic University, adding that the group was unanimous in demanding the resignation of Rainford and largely favored a woman to replace Rainford as dean to better represent the largely-female social work population.
I was very upset that, one, the dean would say something like that, one graduate student said, but also that he would be so nonchalant about students here who are victims of child molestation and sexual assault.
I dont want him speaking for me as a social worker or as a Catholic, added another female student.
Dr. Rainford had used his official school Twitter account to send the tweets. One can understand that the University might not want any such discussion on official accounts. However, that did not seem to be the issue.
In fact, while there was clearly a problem the following day President Garvey suspended Dean Rainford from his position for the rest of the semester what that specific problem was remains amorphous.
In a statement announcing the suspension, President Garvey called the tweets unacceptable, and argued, We should expect any opinion [the Dean] expresses about sexual assault to be thoughtful, constructive, and reflective of the values of Catholic University, particularly in communications from the account handle @NCSSSDean.
How did Will Rainfords tweets fall short?
The tweets called into question the validity of some accusations of sexual assault made against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the statement read. Of deepest concern to me is that they demonstrated a lack of sensitivity to the victim.
Of course, it is a fundamental framework of decently free civilizations that accusations can, specifically, be questioned. And should be. As for sensitivity to the victim, in the Kavanaugh conflagration, who was or was not the victim?
The victim in this Catholic University melodrama seems much clearer: Dr. Rainford, the former dean, who lost his position simply for asking questions that some students and faculty members did not appreciate. If he had tweeted his blind and undying belief in the metaphysical veracity of any female accuser of a Republican, we all know he would still be the Dean of the School of Social Service
Those are the values of Catholic University of which President Garvey spoke.
For his own part, Will Rainford has profusely expressed his contrition in a Cultural Revolution-style statement for his thoughtful/thoughtless tweets: My tweet suggested that [Julie Swetnick] was not a victim of sexual assault. I offer no excuse. It was impulsive and thoughtless and I apologize.
Strange, then, that media coverage of this case fails to even mention a relevant fact. In the aftermath of the Kavanaugh confirmation, Swetnick and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, have been referred to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution for making false statements to Congress.
Swetnick and Avenatti can expect to receive better treatment than an administrator in an establishment of higher education who asks conservative-sounding questions.
Another victim of the seriousness of the charges only going one way.
The Church may not approve of his comments and questions, but I certainly do. I wonder if he has any interest in running for office, he is not afraid to speak the truth. We need more of that.
” . . . demonstrated a lack of sensitivity to the victim.”
As suggested by the article, and the comment above, the use of the term “victim” prejudices any statement using it. Balsey-Ford was only the “victim” if her case was proven, or at the very least, substantiated by available evidence, which of course it wasn’t.
I was involved in the formulation of harassment policy for the entity I once worked for, and I absolutely insisted that in every instance in which the term “victim” was used the term “accuser” replace it. One point of the policy was to establish procedures for determining the validity of accusations of sexual harassment - if you start out by referring to the accusers as “victims”, you’ve essentially already done that.
<><> Rainford needs to run for office, and,
<><> be placed in the Trump Cabinet.
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
Thanks!!!
Y/V/W.
The American education-industrial complex, a complete leftist echo-chamber and bubble, funded by massive spending and massive debt, has claimed another victim.
I can’t believe no politician is grasping this issue.
Hes lucky. Rainford could be laying face down in a ditch with a bullet in his head.
When I was in college 50 years ago, all matter of free speech was encouraged and allowed. It was, after all, a place of learning and probing of young minds for new awareness.
Today, however, it is a completely different picture. Any speech, language, social media comments, tweets or casual conversation with a classmate, can "trigger" offended "victims" to protest, demand ousters, firings and their own, private safe spaces to withdraw from the evil, bad world of speech they don't like (or are taught they shouldn't like, as in conservative views).
And, of course, the weak-kneed administrators of these institutions of propagandized learning, buckle and give-in at the slightest hint of protest or offense taken by just a few students but sometimes of only one person complaining.
The tragedy about this is that these training grounds for "victims", "haters" and "offended ones" will be the ultimate downfall of our country.
If you teach young people to hate their country and it's values, then who among them will stand up and step forward to defend that country when the time warrants it? None.
Until we get a handle on this zombiafication of our young people in our schools and universities by the radical, political far Left, we will continue to slide into chaos and division.
I place the blame at the feet of the democRATS and their liberal followers.
The Left immediately presented this Ford gal as "the victim" even though she was making unsubstantiated, unproven allegations about something that supposedly happened 40 years ago.
In our society and system of justice, you're not a victim of anything unless you can make a factual case for the accused perpetrator to, at the least, be arrested and charged with a crime. If they are ultimately proven innocent of any wrongdoing, the "victim" status disappears.
But the democRATS automatically assign "victim" status to those they need to make their case. It's part of their liberal modus operandi that everybody in their base is considered a "victim" of something that the Republicans are doing to them.
Ford is a "victim" alright but it wasn't at the hands of the accused Kavanaugh. The allegations against him were never proven and he was confirmed.
What she is a "victim" of, is the democRATS using her for there own political ends, without any "sensitivity" towards this woman's obvious unstable mental state. Wad her up and throw her away afterwards. Think Cindy Sheehan. Or Sandra Fluke.
Or rather, after she has raked in a big stash of free cash from a Go-Fund effort. Didn't cost the democRATS anything to pay back Ford for coming forward to embarrass herself and the country. Their base paid the woman for her theatrics with their own donations. Clever.
Thank you for bringing that to my attention and yes I will make that call...libs need to be removed from any type of leadership in ALL positions, they have shown they are not mentally responsible...
Dean Rainford sounds like a heavy weight - we need him.
Brilliant catch.
I suspect C/B/F is now on a sodium pentathol drip......trying to "remember" so she can cash in on the book deal.
Without evidence, a victim is merely an accuser.
He was born in 65. She was born in 66.
“He was born in 65. She was born in 66.”
That seems to be true. So, what was Rainford thinking? Was he misinformed?
That’s next. Metoo executions
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.