These are not ‘activist’ judges, they are fascists and they will do anything to ensure their masters control what we say, do, think, and even remember.
Good. I hope Trump is pissed enough to just ignore the order.
So not only those that sneak in, but if some storm the border to enter as they did at a checkpoint in Mexico according to this judge they should still be eligible for asylum? That is truly insanity.
These judges blocking the enforcement of immigration laws and rulings are saying no need to follow our laws or policy, and we will welcome you anyway.
President Trump behaving like former President Jackson would be great
The Judge doesn’t even make sense on this.
He needs to do something more than complain to reporters. He must have known this would happen why wasn’t the appeal filed this morning?
The judge ignores U.S. Code § 1158 - Asylum (2)(a) which states that since they were offered asylum in a country before they came to the US and turned it down, they are not eligible for asylum
Can 9th Circuit judges be removed, or are these lifetime appointments?
Trump and Turtle need to fill EVERY VACANCY on EVERY COURT at hyper speed while they can. I mean EVERY single one.
Split up the Ninth Circus and add another Circuit Court diluting the reach of the Ninth.
Stop denouncing and just ignore it.
The judge made a big mistake. He separated asylum application from mode of entry. It complicates things, but Pres. Trump can just deport them to the last country they came from, for illegal entry, along with copies of their asylum application papers.
Have fun, Mexico!
This is a separation of powers issue. A District Judge has no authority in the field of immigration or in the security operations on our frontiers. Ignore the Judge. Make him do something to assert his imaginary power or jurisdiction.
The judicial appointments are the most lasting damage of the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Trump should string them along and let exactly zero get in. That will kill the next invasion before it starts.
If only there was a way Trump could withhold the cost of the case from the Justice’s pay (not tax-deductible) that made the errant ruling? That way no authority is challenged, but equity accrued.