Posted on 11/12/2018 2:18:29 PM PST by Enlightened1
With those tattoos, I’d say she’s not a Lutheran. She’s a Unitarian.
Personally I believe porn production harms everyone who participates. Whether they eagerly signed-up or not.
I’d say nearly everyone in the ELCA voted Hillary. It’s not a church any more. It’s a social justice forum.
I escaped from that asylum five years ago. What a mess.
Are you freakin kidding me?!?!?
Pastor???? No.
Satans foot soldier.
Dolphin-Free Tuna?
How about “Cage-Free Eggs”?
How about “Do what feels good Christianity”?
we have ethical hacking, so why not?
She is a typical example of the millennial and “gen-x” emergent church. The wickedness of this generation knows no depths.
Theres no return to anything normal after this stuff !
Nadia Bolz-Weber, age 49, has left her ELCA “church”, known as “House for All Sinners and Saints”!
https://www.makers.com/blog/pastor-nadia-bolz-weber-exits-church-with-epic-dance-party
Since she is divorced and without a regular “job”, I imagine that her royalties and speaking fees keep her solvent—or more than solvent!!!!
My Orthodox Priest informed us yesterday that our Temple is a house for sinners!! Period!!!! I know that he is right!
But if any of us sinners chose to indulge in porno (”ethically sourced” or not), we would have to include that in Confession, and repent of it! REALLY!!!!
Ethical source porn???
I’m really puzzled.
If we are saying, as this is a member of clergy here, if we are saying pornographic displays following God’s blessings of human sexuality, are we saying that we would film married couples??
But then, what is the reedeming social value to the viewer here?
It seems like a lot of sects (Catholic, Lutheran and Methodists to name a few) are now becoming politicized and embracing diversity. What does Revelation say about a falling away during the end times?
2) After seeing that pic, I am not 100% convinced that is a biological female.
Stay in your lane, Pastor.
There is a world of difference between sinners knowing that they need a physician and come for healing and sinners who seek to deliberately infect the flock of God.
Our shameful lack of God-endued discernment has removed this difference from before our eyes.
Is Ethically Sourced Porn like Dolphin-Free Tuna?
________________
Or free-range chicks.
Most mainline American denominations are controlled by Satan. Christians should stay away.
SHE cannot be a PASTOR.
Sure, she can put on a costume (”vestments”) and speak in the character of a pastor, but that doesn’t make her one any more than it makes me Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Or, more appropriately to this story, Ophelia.
What gender does he/she/sher identify with?
Shockingly, many Evangelical denominations are as well, increasingly. The promised Strong Delusion is upon us, bare for all to see.
Ravi Zacharias tells the story of a trial in which a lawyer was defending a pornographer of the basest sorts. The lawyer asked the plaintiff, Have you ever gone into an art gallery? The plaintiff responded, Yes. The lawyer continued, Have you paid to go into that art gallery? Again the plaintiff responded, Yes. Were there paintings of naked people in that art gallery?, the lawyer asked. Yes, the plaintiff responded. So why do you call that art, but Playboy pornography? The plaintiff did not have a response.
Have you ever wondered what the difference is between a piece of art featuring nude figures, and pornography? Is there a difference?
In A Pilgrims Regress, C.S. Lewis wrote about a man who ordered milk and eggs from a waiter in a restaurant. After tasting the milk he commented to the waiter that it was delicious. The waiter replied, Milk is only the secretion of a cow, just like urine and feces. After eating the eggs he commented on the tastiness of the eggs. Again the waiter responded that eggs are only a by-product of a chicken. After thinking about the waiters comment for a moment the man responded, You lie. You dont know the difference between what nature has meant for nourishment, and what it meant for garbage.
Ravi Zacharias notes that while both art and pornography utilize nude figures, the purpose/motives for portraying the naked body are definitively distinct. Pornography utilizes nude figures for the pure purpose of stimulating the baser instincts of individuals; instincts that will not be satisfied by that alone. Art, on the other hand, utilizes nude figures for the purpose of highlighting the beauty of man. While pornography engenders lust, art engenders admiration for the glory and beauty of the human body, and thus the glory of its Maker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.