Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Palm Beach County election scam works. Broward must be similar.
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/12/2018 | Commenter at Gateway Pundit

Posted on 11/12/2018 6:15:14 AM PST by dennisw

**** This is a comment by TheDreadnought found at Gateway Pundit

TheDreadnought • 3 minutes ago This is from one of the commenters from Zero Hedge... I'd hyper link it but may break TOC with TGP.

The commenter is CAPT DRAKE

I worked the polls in Palm Beach County and can tell you how the fraud works:

1. Not at the individual polling location. These are decent people, none willing to take a felony for anybody.

2. Once the ballots are printed, the fraud starts.

3. You must have a huge stack of preprinted ballots to fill out and have ready to count should they be "needed". Note that the election must be close to commit fraud.

4. A group of hard core criminals are paid large to sit in a room and fill in the ballots, straight "D". They dont always get it right, hence the 24,000 or so ballots with no vote for governor. Note that this only happened in Broward County. This is a fraud data point.

5. The boxes of ballots are moved around at night with the support of the full county apparatus. These boxes are staged in various locations to be used as needed.

6. Law enforcement for some reason does not get involved, even when clear procedural violations of law are taking place. Not criminal law? Beg to differ. This allows the conspirators to act with virtual impunity as their chance of getting arrested and prosecuted is zero.

7. Under the mantra that all votes must be counted, more and more fraud ballots are fed into the machines. Eventually, after the "R" is behind the "D" and the counting stops after "all votes are counted".

8. All evidence is somehow destroyed, and the "auditable trail" is somehow not so traceable or even close to being transparent. Evidence is destroyed on the fly.

So how to stop this? The fraud ring in Broward and Palm Beach county must be broken up. Problem is only law enforcement can stop it. Civil proceedings wont do as liberal billionairs are funding the effort. It has to be get a bunch of them in a room one at a time and use the standard "first in, first out" to get some of them to turn

From the ZERO HEDGE article : Scott Files Lawsuits Asking Police To Seize Ballots In Broward, Palm Beach Counties


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; belongsinbloggers; blog; bluezones; broward; cultureofcorruption; fl2018; palmbeach; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: dennisw

In Michigan, all ballots are serialized and must be accounted for as either being issued to a specific voter, spoiled and destroyed, or unissued and available for inspection.

A tear off tab at the top of the ballot has the serial number of the ballot which is recorded in the voting record log as being issued to a registered voter, and retained for later audit.

The number of serial number tags must match the number of ballots cast, and must be assigned to a valid voter. This makes it much harder to stuff the ballot box, since you’d have to go back through the registered voter rolls and assign tag numbers to people who didn’t show up to vote.

Does Florida not have any controls over how many ballots are printed?


21 posted on 11/12/2018 7:13:44 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

okay now we are getting somewhere!

I knew I needed help here but I wasn’t sure what I was doing wrong; Even after you asked that question, my initial response was to think “No, my ballot had my name on it. It came with a sticker label pre-printed”

But now that I think about it, that wasn’t on the ballot itself, was it. I’m a little bit hazy on this fact, but if true, it’s an amazing point and I wonder if I’m the only one who needs this fact pointed out to them.

So if ballots themselves are not distinguishable, we have no way to audit the system and the results. There is no way to go back and look at ballots themselves and validate their authenticity.


22 posted on 11/12/2018 7:13:49 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: z3n

You have Dead voters, felons, illegal and those no longer in FL on the VOTER REGISTRATION ROLLS. Those names are put on precooked Democrat ballots. How are you going to track down every “Juan Garcia” or out of thousands with the same name? These fake votes are then mixed into the machines with real votes and are undetectable.

The only fix is to disqualify all votes not turned in when the polls closed. Provisional votes should never have been allowed.They are an invitation to cheat.


23 posted on 11/12/2018 7:17:01 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Could be everyone who didn’t vote, but is on the rolls. Could be people who are registered in several locations. Could be dead people, dogs, cats, part-time residents like students and snowbirds, who are actually registered in their home states. No names go on the ballots, but these ballots are presented as having been submitted by anyone who could have but did not actually vote. And in some cases, just added in on top (where we have seen voter turnout exceed 100% of registered voters at some times in the past).


24 posted on 11/12/2018 7:17:44 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio; Yo-Yo

Per Yo-YO
In Michigan, all ballots are serialized and must be accounted for as either being issued to a specific voter, spoiled and destroyed, or unissued and available for inspection.

A tear off tab at the top of the ballot has the serial number of the ballot which is recorded in the voting record log as being issued to a registered voter, and retained for later audit.

The number of serial number tags must match the number of ballots cast, and must be assigned to a valid voter. This makes it much harder to stuff the ballot box, since you’d have to go back through the registered voter rolls and assign tag numbers to people who didn’t show up to vote.

That’s the way to do it.


25 posted on 11/12/2018 7:18:41 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
When we had punch card ballots, the stub retained by the poll worker was numbered, but not the card (unless it was really small or printed in invisible ink).

Works that way in Michigan with our optically-scanned ballots. The stub has the serial number, and that serial number is recorded as being assigned to a voter. The ballot itself, after the stub is torn off, has no serial number, but the number of ballots cast needs to equal the number of stubs assigned to voters. This recording is done via laptop computers by the poll workers, so there is an electronic time stamp as to when the ballot serial number was assigned to the voter.

In order to stuff the ballot box, you'd have to assign the serial numbers to voters who didn't vote, and do it after the polls close. The time stamp would show that it was done after the polls closed, or else there would be many more votes cast and counted than there were serial numbers assigned to voters. Either one is a red flag indicating vote fraud.

26 posted on 11/12/2018 7:21:02 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Those are excellent responses. In this day of cheap and easy surveillance electronics, both video and location tracking, there is no reason that every move can’t be tracked.

Republicans may need to take this into their own hands initially. Citizen surveillance of the back doors of election offices in these troublesome counties beginning a week or two before the election and continuing until the votes are certified, starting in the next important election. Track their every move and document it on video, then make them answer for what they were doing. A GoPro and a GPS and a car is all you need.


27 posted on 11/12/2018 7:44:28 AM PST by doragsda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

From the article: “Law enforcement for some reason does not get involved,...”

“All evidence is somehow destroyed, and the “auditable trail” is somehow not so traceable or even close to being transparent.”

IF THIS sort of “eye witness” is all we have to fight back with it’s no wonder nothing is being done.

Where are the statements of how the fraud is accomplished. This is speculation. I can do that very well.


28 posted on 11/12/2018 7:44:42 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

“Why the hell are people who have repeatedly broken the law IN THIS ELECTION still even handling ballots? Wtf?”

Because someone has to have both the authority and the cojones to haul their asses to jail.

No one does.


29 posted on 11/12/2018 7:49:23 AM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Very interesting article. Thanks for the post. This will not stop until Republicans to the same thing as an act of civil disobedience.

How is it the pan handle had none of these problems despite the recent devastation by a hurriance?
30 posted on 11/12/2018 8:07:23 AM PST by Kid Shelleen ((Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mistfree

I thought you were “dancing” around the issue...


31 posted on 11/12/2018 8:12:40 AM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

also more evidence of fraud.. WTH!

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3705083/posts?page=1


32 posted on 11/12/2018 9:01:18 AM PST by bitt ("Let justice be done though the heavens fall".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n
Here is a sample ballot from Ohio for 2012. See anywhere that the voter's name IS or WOULD BE ?


33 posted on 11/12/2018 9:09:42 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Wish I had taken a picture of mine.
If there was a label on it, it wouldn’t have been on the business side of the ballot, but again as I said, after I thought about it, I’m fairly sure that the label was on the envelope.

I do think the ballot had something printed on it similar to a bar code


34 posted on 11/12/2018 9:15:07 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Don W; mistfree

LOL!


35 posted on 11/12/2018 9:15:43 AM PST by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: z3n
So if ballots themselves are not distinguishable, we have no way to audit the system and the results. There is no way to go back and look at ballots themselves and validate their authenticity.

In THEORY, the ballots have a 'number' printed on them that is recorded by the Polling Station Staff. However, the machine that counts your vote does not keep track of that number, so there is no way to prove that the votes it 'recorded' belong to you.

36 posted on 11/12/2018 9:17:18 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: z3n

What I find interesting is that if we used the staff and techniques of the gambling casinos, there would be NO WAY to cheat on voting.


37 posted on 11/12/2018 9:22:00 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I think I understand why this happens. If you create a system where people’s ballots are recorded and assigned to a verifiable identity, then you can (and probably will) get hacks and leaks of people’s actual votes. So even though this is what you would need in order to be able to audit and validate identities and votes, the danger is having people’s voting exposed, which in this day&age with the fanaticism of some of these leftist groups, it could pose a danger for people’s voting to be exposed.

Something has to be done though. The system needs to fixed.


38 posted on 11/12/2018 9:23:11 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: z3n; UCANSEE2
***So if ballots themselves are not distinguishable, we have no way to audit the system and the results. There is no way to go back and look at ballots themselves and validate their authenticity***

We have the secret vote in the U.S. Once the voter has ID'd him/her self the ballot is taken and considered 'cast' and then registered. Thus there is no way to verify individual ballots. The only way to guarantee the integrity of elections is to hold election officials criminally liable. Here in Fla we are seeing that that is not ever done.

The Dems are represented by Joseph Stalin; we are represented by Barney Fife.

39 posted on 11/12/2018 9:38:23 AM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: z3n
If you create a system where people’s ballots are recorded and assigned to a verifiable identity, then you can (and probably will) get hacks and leaks of people’s actual votes.

Another issue is that if you remove then anonymity of the ballot, you can then pay someone to vote a specific way, and also validate that they did, in fact, vote as you intended. As it is now, they can pay for a vote, and can validate that voter X voted, but cannot correlate the vote to specific candidates.

This is one of the reasons (of many) that electronic voting, i.e., voting through the internet is extremely hard to do correctly and securely. Most folks figure that if we can do internet banking, we ought to be able to do internet voting, but in banking, you want each individual transaction to be completely auditable in both directions. Not so with voting. You have to be able to validate that voter X is a valid voter. You also have to validate that voter X is voter X. Finally, when the transaction is executed, there is no way to tie a particular vote for a particular candidate to voter X.

Now, if you want to remove anonymity from the voting process, things become somewhat easier, but you open up other cans of worms that you may not like in the long run.

40 posted on 11/12/2018 9:53:09 AM PST by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson