To: E. Pluribus Unum
Was there ever a time when Snopes was not openly partisan?
2 posted on
11/05/2018 2:18:30 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
3 posted on
11/05/2018 2:20:43 PM PST by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
6 posted on
11/05/2018 2:24:05 PM PST by
Baynative
( "If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sounds like ‘fact obscurers’.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Snopes wouldn’t know a fact if it slapped them in the face.
14 posted on
11/05/2018 2:46:10 PM PST by
TADSLOS
(I hate Russian Dolls. They are so full of themselves.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“– Breitbart normally takes a pro-gun stance. Does Breitbart maintain that stance when the gun owners are black?”
What a loon.
And Breitbart didn’t attempt to contact the Black Panthers ?
Oh yeah, because 1-800-black-panthers picks up whenever Breitbart calls.
15 posted on
11/05/2018 2:48:49 PM PST by
Celerity
To: E. Pluribus Unum
All of the “fact-checker” organizations I am familiar with including Snopes and Politifact are organs of the Ministry of Propaganda.
16 posted on
11/05/2018 2:58:28 PM PST by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
19 posted on
11/05/2018 3:18:27 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s OK. It’s a cracker state.
22 posted on
11/05/2018 3:42:54 PM PST by
Crucial
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’m still waiting for Snopes to debunk the “hands up don’t shoot” narrative.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Over watch, you trackin the dude with Scar?
“Yea, I got him.”
Send it.
32 posted on
11/05/2018 5:27:57 PM PST by
The Toll
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Snopes is a cat lady in a basement - her Husband left her for a stripper
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
