Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds Give $570,890 Science Grant to ‘Intersectional Feminisms’ Professor
The Free Beacon ^ | October 18, 2018 | Elizabeth Harrington

Posted on 10/18/2018 7:54:17 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

The National Science Foundation awarded a half a million dollars to an "intersectional feminisms" professor to study how to recruit more women into STEM fields.

The goal of the study, being led by Dr. Coleen Carrigan, a feminist anthropologist at California Polytechnic State University, is to "interrupt the reproduction of dominant class rule" in engineering and computer science programs. Carrigan's research focuses on how to "transform the powers of technology to advance social justice."

The project involves studying female engineering professors to "lend critical insights into the social/technical divide" that results in fewer women entering science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) programs.

The study seeks to upend current engineering and computer science programs by educating students and faculty on the "benefits of diversity and transformations required to foster welcoming environments for women."

"Due to the prominence and impact of ECS [engineering and computer science], identifying gender inequities in the field and interrupting them will help welcome and retain more talented women from a range of intersectional identities," the grant for the project states. "Harnessing the power of diversity in this way will positively contribute to all domains on which computing impinges."

The study has received $570,890 from taxpayers so far. Research began in June and is slated to continue through May 2023.

Other aims of the study include conceptualizing "labor segregation" and "intersecting vectors of gender."

"To yield new knowledge useful in efforts to broaden participation, this CAREER project systematically conceptualizes how labor segregation may relate to an ideological hierarchy between the social and technical dimensions of computing and influence cultural exclusions along intersecting vectors of gender and race," the grant states.

The project will create "educational interventions" into the engineering and computer science culture in order to "both interrupt the reproduction of dominant class rule and to study the beliefs and power relations of computing communities."

"Not only does this project contribute a novel qualitative theory of cultural change in ECS, it also tests innovative methods to better elucidate who and what counts in the field and why," the grant states.

Carrigan, the principal investigator on the study, is an assistant professor of Gender, Race, Culture, Science and Technology Studies at Cal Poly's Women's and Gender Studies Department.

Her research fields include "Intersectional Feminisms," "Cultural anthropology," "Science and technology studies," "Action-oriented ethnography," and "Broadening participation."

"First, she uses action-oriented ethnography to document women's lived experiences as marginalized members of STEM fields, the ways they navigate the politics of gender and race and the rites of passage in high-tech communities that reproduce inequalities and the ideological divide between the social and the technical," according to Carrigan's faculty page.

Carrigan also studies "feminist consciousness."

"Second, she studies women's intersectional identities and feminist consciousness and excavates the collective actions and values critical to demanding and enacting institutional change in STEM cultures," the website states. "Third, she examines cultures of STEM knowledge production through the experiences and perspectives of undergraduate students from marginalized standpoints."

"She applies her research findings to create interventions that help foster welcoming environments for underrepresented groups in STEM and transform the powers of technology to advance social justice," according to Cal Poly.

Courses taught by Carrigan include "Gender, Race, Culture, Science and Technology" and "Queer Anthropology."

She did not immediately respond to request for comment.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
The NSF: more swamp scum that needs to be drained.
1 posted on 10/18/2018 7:54:17 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Science?

The misunderstanding is strong there.


2 posted on 10/18/2018 7:57:01 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Who is approving this crap?


3 posted on 10/18/2018 7:57:01 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

” Carrigan’s research focuses on how to “transform the powers of technology to advance social justice.”

Scary in a fascist kind of way.


4 posted on 10/18/2018 7:58:23 AM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“social justice.”

Pull the grant.

Next.

5.56mm


5 posted on 10/18/2018 7:58:26 AM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Stupidity reigns. Women who are interested in STEM will pursue it. Those who are not interested will pursue other things. Why must we PAY to interest the uninterested?


6 posted on 10/18/2018 7:58:51 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

“Who is approving this crap?”

...and why the HELL can’t somebody put a stop to it? They are spending OUR money to pay the enemy to teach the next generation destroy us. Very little makes me as angry as our tax dollars paying for this crap.


7 posted on 10/18/2018 7:59:08 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The education-industrial complex bubble is huge. It supports a huge, ideological, parasitical leftist political base, all on the backs of Federal Government spending, and above all, sky-high tuitions and massive student debt.

It is crying out for reform.


8 posted on 10/18/2018 7:59:20 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The American taxpayers are paying half a million dollars to underwrite their own demise.


9 posted on 10/18/2018 7:59:26 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“The National Science Foundation awarded a half a million dollars to an “intersectional feminisms” professor to study how to recruit more women into STEM fields.”

Either Elizabeth Harrington or the NSF needs to get with the program.

Our racist, sexist overlords have added “A” for “Arts” to STEM.

http://stemtosteam.org/


10 posted on 10/18/2018 7:59:40 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

‘Intersectional Feminisms’ is the mother of all nothing burgers, sucking both IQ points from this so-called “professor”.

It’s long past time for us to institute “Brain Shaming” for this collection of people for whom even fifth grade level classes are an un-winnable challenge.


11 posted on 10/18/2018 8:00:57 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

“transform the powers of technology to advance social justice.”

AKA how to track and exterminate politically conservative internet users.


12 posted on 10/18/2018 8:01:02 AM PDT by Rebelbase (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Its easy...stop wasting young children time teaching them useless nonsense and teach real science.
Where is my 500k?


13 posted on 10/18/2018 8:02:42 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Eliminate all non-STEM majors. That would increase the number of females in STEM courses. That’s the answer. You can send me the $500k.


14 posted on 10/18/2018 8:03:08 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
"Who is approving this crap?"

National Science Foundation: "Where Discoveries Begin"

Merit Review Facts

  1. All proposals submitted to NSF are reviewed according to the two merit review criteria: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts
  2. NSF implemented revised merit review criteria in January 2013 [Guess who was POTUS then!]
  3. NSF Program Officers make recommendations to fund or decline a proposal
  4. Most proposals that are awarded do not receive all "Excellents" [Do ANY receive a "This is pure crap" rating?]
  5. NSF Program Officers are encouraged to recommend high risk science and engineering projects for funding [Yeah, right]
  6. Principal Investigators submit on average about 2.3 proposals for every award they receive
  7. NSF promotes broadening participation in science and engineering
  8. NSF annually has active awards at over 2,000 awardee organizations

15 posted on 10/18/2018 8:05:24 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The Bible calls these kind of women “contentious”

Woman was created to be a “helper” . . . of course women pursuing that kind of ideology thinks the Bible and Christianity is nonsense anyway


16 posted on 10/18/2018 8:06:00 AM PDT by RatRipper (The Democrat Party is the party of liars, swindlers, cheats and unbridled immorality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

“transform the powers of technology to advance social justice.”

Teaching a dufus SJW how to turn on the lights?


17 posted on 10/18/2018 8:06:05 AM PDT by litehaus (A memory toooo long.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

NSF is as much a cesspool as the NE for the Arts. Defund now and use the money for the wall.


18 posted on 10/18/2018 8:09:34 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

> Who is approving this crap? <

Great question. This type of spending shouldn’t be allowed even in a nation that is running a surplus. But the USA is a debtor nation. That makes it even worse.

Trump has been in office for almost two years now. I understand the difficulties when dealing with the Deep State. But sooner or later Trump is going to have to own this. It might not be fair, but the buck really does stop in the Oval Office.


19 posted on 10/18/2018 8:10:38 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
"Who is approving this crap?"

The NSF "Merit Review" page has a "CONTACT US" section at the bottom that reads...

If you have additional questions regarding the NSF Merit Review Process or proposal submission and preparation, please contact us:

By email: policy@nsf.gov
By phone: (703) 292-8243

So I called the phone number to complain. I got a voicemail recording: "You've reached the Policy Office of the NSF. In order to better serve you, send your questions to policy@nsf.gov." Then you can leave a recorded message. You cannot reach a human being at "Contact Us." They obviously do not want to hear from people upset about this garbage.
20 posted on 10/18/2018 8:10:54 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson