Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: yesthatjallen
“Voting rights” being that illegal criminal aliens will get to vote in elections they never should be allowed to vote in. Must be Odungo or Bush appointed judges, Quality D-.
2 posted on
10/09/2018 8:17:29 PM PDT by
EinNYC
To: yesthatjallen
many of them live on reservations without standard addresses.
As far as I know, there are no reservations in Missouri. That’s how the state kept out Indian casinos.
5 posted on
10/09/2018 8:22:08 PM PDT by
hanamizu
To: yesthatjallen
This judge is a criminal by my standards.
6 posted on
10/09/2018 8:22:14 PM PDT by
Retvet
(Retvet)
To: yesthatjallen
The poll workers in Idaho take your photo id, look up the page where you are listed and have you sign next to your name BEFORE they hand you a ballot. You're identified and you sign so you vote exactly once.
8 posted on
10/09/2018 8:26:02 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: yesthatjallen
Who would object to voter ID?
Other than someone who wants voting to be devalued.
9 posted on
10/09/2018 8:26:35 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: yesthatjallen
Its RACIST to require I.D.
< /sarc>
To: yesthatjallen
Let’s see...
Have to show photo ID to:
Board a plane
Cash a check
Use a credit card
Buy a car
Rent a car
Rent an apartment
Enter a school
Buy alcohol
Buy cigarettes
But showing a photo ID to vote is verboten. It infringes on someone’s right to stuff ballot boxes with as many votes as they want.
11 posted on
10/09/2018 8:28:48 PM PDT by
2CAVTrooper
(Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
To: yesthatjallen
This would be an excellent case for the SCOTUS to take. We have conflicting rulings from various courts. Time to start reaping the benefits of pushing Gorsuch and Kavanaugh through. The SCOTUS should uphold Official photo ID requirements in order to vote.
The vast majority of the public supports it too.
14 posted on
10/09/2018 8:34:44 PM PDT by
FLT-bird
To: yesthatjallen
Must be an Obama appointed judge. ACLU approved.
To: yesthatjallen
So why is Ashcroft appealing if he is “pleased” with the judge’s ruling? Very confused
To: yesthatjallen
Why do we let liberals get away with calling the need for photo ID, "voter suppression"?
We need to be loud and clear that opposing the need for photo ID is VOTER FRAUD!
19 posted on
10/09/2018 8:42:31 PM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: yesthatjallen
Valid laws are only the ones which don't interfere with a judge's personal agenda.
21 posted on
10/09/2018 8:47:20 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' babies!)
To: yesthatjallen
Leftists learned that the best way to thwart the will of the people, is to control the courts.
An originalist SCotUS which prevents such ludicrousness is their public enemy #1. Hence, the calls to delegitimize/ignore it of late.
22 posted on
10/09/2018 9:10:03 PM PDT by
Dr.Deth
To: yesthatjallen
What BS. First of all what reservation exists in Missouri? Second that reservation us apparently different than any other than the nation.
23 posted on
10/09/2018 9:12:26 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: yesthatjallen
A Missouri judge on Tuesday ruled that state election officials can no longer spread materials that indicate voters must provide a photo ID in order to cast a ballot, Reuters reported. The news outlet reported that Judge Richard Callahan, who sits on the Cole County Circuit Court, ruled that the materials must also specify other forms of identifications that voters can show. He additionally wrote that state authorities can't require people who are otherwise qualified to vote to sign a sworn statement.
Is it just me or is this totally contradictory? Officials can no longer spread the materials, but the materials that they can no longer spread must specify other forms of identifications?
24 posted on
10/09/2018 9:13:54 PM PDT by
Shethink13
(there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
To: yesthatjallen
Here come the Supremes. (1st armored Kav!)
25 posted on
10/09/2018 9:13:56 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: yesthatjallen
Maybe if they caught Natalia Veselnitskaya voting without aa picture ID, the Democrats might must some concern.
To: yesthatjallen
We live near an Indian Reservation and all the houses sit on streets with names.
29 posted on
10/09/2018 9:34:11 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
To: yesthatjallen
How is showing voter ID against *voting rights*?
The only ones with a RIGHT to vote are citizens and proof of citizenship is not denying anyone their basic right to vote.
What liars dems are.
35 posted on
10/10/2018 1:09:33 AM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
To: yesthatjallen
So, they can just show a library card?
36 posted on
10/10/2018 1:31:33 AM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson