Posted on 10/09/2018 4:39:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Brett Kavanaugh took the bench with his new Supreme Court colleagues for the first time Tuesday in a jovial atmosphere that was strikingly at odds with the tension and rancor surrounding his high-court confirmation.
The new justice dived into his new job, asking a handful of questions in the first arguments of the day following a traditional welcome from Chief Justice John Roberts, who wished Kavanaugh "a long and happy career in our common calling."
Kavanaugh took his seat at the end of the bench to Roberts' far left, a visible manifestation of a moment that Republicans have dreamed of for decades, with five solidly conservative justices on the court, and Democrats have dreaded.
His path to confirmation was turbulent opposition to him intensified after Christine Blasey Ford accused him of sexually assaulting her decades ago, when they were teenagers. Kavanaugh denied it.
In court, Kavanaugh asked questions of both sides in arguments over increased prison sentences for repeat offenders. He jumped in with his first question after most of the other justices had spoken....
(Excerpt) Read more at kstp.com ...
I don’t trust Roberts either - perhaps the change in personnel will make a difference...he now has an extra good minds to dissent some of his lapses...I’d like to think he was just a weak-kneed wimp that bowed to a lot of pressure and maybe regrets what he did...hope he proves that is a possible answer...
I do not accept your premise that he did not help "in any way", and although I don't know if you have the knowledge or expertise even to declare that he did nothing, I am no fan of "all or nothing" language, because it usually indicates a person who speaks rashly and judges harshly out of his/her depth.
But even if he did do "nothing", I commend him for erring on the side of discretion as befits a top Justice of the land. The Court gets politicized by small increments. He wisely avoided adding another. What he did do is play a key role in the reconciliation and show of support at the swearing-in.
What he did behind the scenes, I don't know; but I suspect a LOT of positive help. What he did behind the scenes, you probably do NOT know; but you suspect utter negativity and condemn without knowing. See the difference?
My comment was about public support.
If he helped in some way privately; fine, but private support would do nothing to calm or counter the media outrage.
If Justice Kennedy truly valued his law clerk he could have made a simple statement about his work ethic and temperament. He could have even joked that they had a beer together.
I do not commend him for erring on the side of discretion. What befits a “top Justice of the land” is to be loyal to one who has served you well.
You are assuming his silence is a sign of support. I can’t assume that.
“The court gets politicized,” you said. How about the court IS politicized.
Ginsburg trashes Trump and Kagan ( who hired Kavanaugh at Harvard ) now regards his temperament as unsuitable for the court.
We are so done here. Kindly just drop it. You have not made your case to me. Find someone else to haggle with.
Yeah we are. Hard to argue about being a decent person and saying something nice about someone who worked so diligently for you.
Your argument to the contrary was so done the minute it started.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.