I hope when the smoke clears that the DOJ starts charging people with perjury.
Theory of the day is that Ford used Mike Judge’s book, the yearbook, and made up her claims.
Here it is laid out:
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1046930537678557184
Yeah, but Senator Dick Turban (Dim-Ill-Annoy) needs to gaze into her eyes in the Senate Committee Room with the cameras rolling and confirm, by percentage, her confidence in the story. I’m sure it’s 100% which is good enough for The Dick.
The Crazy Oregon woman has been destroyed by the left, Ford is looking at prison.
This explains the move to “Brett is a drunk” story.
Where have we heard this before?
GWB used influence to avoid the draft.
GWB was a drunk.
2 Cor 13:1 ... Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.
Deuteronomy 19:5 A lone witness is not sufficient to establish any wrongdoing or sin against a man, regardless of what offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.
That is what makes this a farce. There is but one witness. And interestingly, she tried to call out other witnesses and they all denied it. So, one witness...
Can we please end this charade and vote him on the scotus!
What seem to be unmentioned is that Blasey didn’t say anything to her best friend Leland about this “assault”. Teenage girls tell their best friends EVERY thing, especially when it’s about boys.
The reason seems obvious: it wasn’t an assault. Not by the legal standard of the day nor in her own mind. Even if you accept that it happened just as she testified, it’s a couple of kids and a failed make-out session. If you could honestly poll men from that era about similar “attempted seductions” the number who would honestly admit they’d pressed their luck a bit too far would no doubt be over half. What started with “no means No!” has now turned into making a touch on the shoulder a sex crime.
It isn’t and it wasn’t then, and Blasey knows damn well it wasn’t. She’s just concocted this “recovered memory” to rationalize something in her own psyche. And my bet its Kavanaugh was selected to play the villain because she had a teenage crush on him. Put that question in her next polygraph.
Is there a point at which people stop allowing their thoughts to be totally manipulated?
I predict Kavenaugh will be voted DOWN in the full senate. I do not say this happily, but I do predict it.
The “enemy-media” will smooth it and confuse it as best they can, and Republicans will accept it, grudgingly and loudly verbally — but they WILL accept it.
I think in many ways the country is already lost to the Liberal-Progressive hoards. This will demonstrate that repulsive fact.
The politicians — ALL OF THEM! — are interested ONLY in their own profit and power, and what YOU think matters not at all.
I wish I did not believe any of that, but there it is.
Well, Chrissy...looks like your “repressed memories”, are still “repressed”.
Those two (dem operative) lawyers, and the dems, have lead you into a world of $h/+.
But, but, but...we’re supposed to believe women.
Fine, I believe Ms. Keyser.
MAGA!
Okay, thats just about everyone...
Whens Chrissys turn?
I think that it is crucial for the FBI to interview each of Dr. Ford’s personalities and all of her imaginary friends.
Here is an email I received last night ...
Party was held, who she was with or how she got home. She was drinking and said nothing to anyone.
1983,
1984,
1985,
1986,
1987,
1988,
1989,
1990,
1991,
1992,
1993,
1994,
1995,
1996,
1997,
1998,
1999,
2000,
2001,
2002... She said nothing.
July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit... She said nothing.
2004,
2005... She said nothing.
May 11, 2006: The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recommended confirmation. Kavanaugh subsequently confirmed by the United States Senate... She said nothing.
June 1, 2006: Kavanaugh sworn in by Justice Anthony Kennedy... She said nothing.
2007,
2008,
2009,
2010,
2011... She said nothing.
2012... She remembered ‘something’ happened in 1982, yet doesn’t name Kavanaugh, still said nothing to authorities.
2013,
2014,
2015,
2016,
2017 - She becomes an anti-trump activist.
2018 - Now 36 years later, with Kavanaugh’s SCOTUS confirmation looming, she pens an anonymous letter with grave accusations against Kavanaugh regarding foggy circumstance that occurred while they were both minors, then reveals herself and DEMANDS an FBI investigation before testifying to her incredible allegations?
Who does she think she is?.......
If one of your lifelong friends you named as an eyewitness witness doesn’t corroborate your story, that should be the end of it.
Here’s the thing (and I double checked this) ... ALL of the critical statements were submitted to the Judiciary Committee under PENALTY OF FELONY. By ‘critical’, I mean the folks named by Ffffford i.e PJ Smyth, Mark Judge, & Leland Keyser.
None of those folks are going to go back on their statements because then it opens them up to a lying/perjury charge ... ok, so were you lying when you submitted your statement or are you lying now when you changed it?
I expect no changes and so far, it has been reported that Keyser, Smyth & Judge have stood by their statments to the committee.
Ramirez ... the press (NBC) is milking that situation for all it’s worth, but it’s so weak, with no corroboration after a massive hunt by Ramirez/media to find someone, anyone to corroborate.
Swetnick already backed up on the details in her sworn statement. Avenatti keeps saying he’s got a woman in FL to corroborate, etc. but if you look at his history with the Judicial Committee, he’s had plenty of chances to bring Swetnick forward with evidence and he has yet to do it. It appears he will only allow his clients to talk to the FBI .... he does this because talking to the FBI, in a twisted way, adds credibility to what his clients allege - must be serious/credible if the FBI wants to interview. It’s also better optics for him as a ‘serious’ lawyer, and if the FBI is involved, it’s more damaging (optics again) to those he is trying to hurt. He’s a media whore/got major personal financial problems, just like Swetnick. He must be getting desperate on Swetnick with no FBI interview, so he’s letting her go peddle her Kav character assassination in the media with the Kelly & Tur interviews. Avenatti is the male version of Gloria Allred. If Avenatti is associated with your case, then likely by that fact alone, you are not credible and have no evidence.
I wonder if they asked any follow up questions, like were you ever at a party perhaps years later that matched the description but not the participants?
FNC just announced the FBI has finished interviewing Judge but they will not comment on questions asked.