What, exactly, is there to "investigate?"
[ What, exactly, is there to “investigate?” ]
1) He be bad because President Trump nominated him.
2) He be bad because Democrats say so
3) He be bad because of his history as a judge
4) He be bad because Dianne Feinstein be good.
5) He be bad because Democrats hate him ‘n’ stuff.
6) He be bad because he not shining example of good like Bill Clinton.
See? It all makes sense. To a Democrat.
If you were the FBI team to run this.....somebody is the point person, what do you do? You know the people Dr Ford named. You call talk with them. Most of them were more than happy to cooperate. Honestly, those conference calls could easily be completed by EOBD today. Confirm the stories, ask tough questions about the individual’s memory of that time.
IF there were more serious accusations, they would be in the public domain by now.
It would be a tall order to come up with anything else. This actually works to Kav’s favor. If they FBI comes up with nothing, then the narrative that there will be some asterisk by his name needs to be refuted. Like it nor not a snappy slogan like if the gloves don’t fit, you must acquit is what they need. This is to placate the low information voters.
That right there is a VERY good question!
Just what is there to be ‘investigated’ even once, let alone seven times at taxpayer expense?
I don't think they will expand their investigation to the other 2 accusers because they were not asked to do so by the Committee.
I wonder if their (the FBI's) investigation will include a review of the report issued by Rachel Mitchell (the outside sex-crimes prosecutor hired by the GOP senators on the Committee).
Picture COLUMBO saying those lines........