Posted on 09/30/2018 10:52:21 AM PDT by caww
A son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia rejected claims that Brett Kavanaugh lacks the appropriate temperament to serve on the Supreme Court after a contentious hearing with senators Thursday.
"It's really not all that rare for justices to get angry," public relations professional Christopher Scalia said during a Fox News interview. "You read some of the dissents, they're mad. They are often called scathing and fiery."
Scalia, one of nine children of the late conservative justice, said the context of Kavanaugh's hearing is different than what he would face on the court.
"It's true that Justice Kavanaugh was perhaps more aggressive than justices would be, but that's, I think, because the circumstances were a lot different. Justices are talking about points of law. He was defending his good name from uncorroborated allegations," Scalia said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
???
Do you have a link?
I can’t imagine Scalia’s son condemning Kav.
Thanks.
The unhinged, evil Dems are the only ones complaining about Kav’s temperament.
The rest of us are in complete agreement with what Scalia’s son is saying.
God bless and keep Kav and his family.
Flake is of course nothing but a pawn....a cowardly one at that. He’s going to bend to whomever is going to be instrumental in ‘securing his work and position’ AFTER he leaves his office.
No, it was on his twitter feed. I probably misread it.
The media has no ability to report things as they are in reality anymore......they’ve been spinning stories for so long to create the bias they hold that they cannot recognize truth for what it is let alone report it.
Paltering is when a communicator says truthful things and in the process knowingly leads the listener to a false conclusion...... It has the same effect as lying, but it allows the communicator to say truthful things and ‘feel’ like theyre not being as deceptive as the liars they truly are.
I was very pleased Kavanough spoke exactly as he did.....he was being real and that's far more significant than role playing what you want people to believe by evoking ‘feelings’....which is exactly what Fords game was as she read her script to manipulate the audiences ‘feelings’ toward her. She was well practiced but oh my gosh anyone could see right through that from the very minute she opened her mouth....she is most defiantly mental and it wasn’t Kavenough nor likely any man that brought her to that place as I see it.
but, but , but...didn’t the costar of the “Planet of the Apes” movies assert something like:
“If they bring a knife, we’ll bring a gun.”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.