I thought the lady prosecutor asking the questions was excellent. She got some lies out of her. You could see it on Fords face. It didn’t look like she was prepared for some of the questions. She thought she was going to focus on what happened 35 year ago and instead she was asking questions to things that just recently happened and it made her squirm.
I did too. Her closing was brilliant.
She described a proper forensic interview and got Ford to agree that it would have been fairer, easier and more accurate than the hearing was.
She then established, by Ford's own testimony, that Eschoo, Feinstein and both of her lawyers deliberately steered her away from a sensible and proper forensic interview, by never mentioning the possibility, and into the Roman circus of the hearing.
It left Ford with the inescapable conclusion that all four of those people had shamelessly used her and you could see it on her face.
The attorney established Ford lies under oath. I thought she was lying and now I truly believe she is nothing but lies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGxr1VQ2dPI
This link breaks down her testimony deciphering her body language. Heck of a breakdown. Even shows where she is lying about not knowing about the offer letter to conduct the testimony anywhere at her convenience. Please spread this link. It is very eye opening to her testimony body language.