Posted on 09/25/2018 10:21:55 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
Why can't we send this link or the article to these people? Inundate them with this information. It might give pause to some.
Oops, sorry, I did read it wrong. You are right.
Wow, if Ford read this she’d surely be a no-show on Thursday. Every point is spot on that she is lying.
But the red flag with an adamant denial is against the accusation, not the denial.
Does the left get to pick a door for their prize now? They'd pick door # 1, 2 & 3 and claim it was only 1 door since they were all on the same stage.
Good. I’m glad you link this article already.
No he is saying if the accused hem haws around there is something to the accusation. If the accused says nope, there is a problem with the accusation.
He came out right out of the box that he was innocent. What are you talking about?
These are all excellent points.
In most cases, there’s some kernel of truth to even the most exaggerated claims.”””
My take on that statement:
The kernel of truth is that the accused was somewhere in the vicinity, but didn’t do as charged.
In Kavanaugh’s case, I don’t even think he was in town when Ford claims her attack happened.
Yes, I corrected myself in post 22.
I have a question:
IF Ford was never on the West Coast & NEVER did need ‘time to get to Washington DC by driving since she won’t fly’ and the committee can prove that she was in the area ALL THE TIME, can she be prosecuted for lying to the Committee?
IF she cannot prove how she traveled to Washington DC with receipts and other records, AND there is other proof that she has been in the Washington area all along, then she created an ARTIFICIAL delay and LIED to the members of the Senate.
Every cop show on TV today can prove where a person has been by their cell phone activity.
Wouldn’t that be VERY EASY to verify????
We all are very suspicious. I want that information made public regarding her location for the past 10 days.
I have a kernel of truth example. A former supervisor started the harassment behaviors with invitations to lunch that conveniently included a pit stop at his house. Instead of flatly denying these lunch trips, he would justify the lunch invitation as well as the stop at his house.
Not everyone got an invitation or accepted an invitation to lunch. By the time he invited me, I had been advised to decline. Not everyone who went to lunch got the house tour. However, some of his rationalizations of these actions strengthened the accuser’s case.
I think you read that backwards.
Ballsey Ford is 10 for 10. I saw #2 play out at work several years ago.
Good question. We haven’t heard a peep about the phony road trip since it was used as a stall. Lying schemer.
Even the most pro-accuser advocates acknowledge that 5 percent of the claims are simply false.
These studies rely on the accused PROVING the charges false.
That’s a hell of a standard.
I'll bet the prosecutor the GOP is using is very very familiar with this.
This guy want a half hearted denial?
Read it again…
Someone ought to make this into an infographic.
They could send it to Ford and all Senate Democrats and the MSM - and all would universally trash it or ignore it without even a second thought.
Fascists are fascist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.