[z3n]

Ronan created sooo much #metoo clout and cred on real, verifiable, repeat offenders.

Now, apparently, it’s time to call in that cred. And for what? Not for the sake of a real victim. They know what’s really up. This built up cache is being spent to save Roe

[doug from upland]

[TalBlack]

I’d say Farrow just shot his reputation. He used to back up he reveals. Not this last one.

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

Dems will try to destroy ANYONE in their path.

This character assassination needs to cease.

Praying for Brett & his Family.

[Pollster1]

When the only accuser is unsure and it’s still on the front page, you know anti-American #FakeNews is in on the action.

[SaveFerris]

[ Jane Mayer: Accuser Told Ronan Farrow She Wasn’t Sure of Story ]

But hey, we’re Democrats trying to disrupt the Mid-terms and the Supreme Court conservative nominee so let’s run with it!!!!!

[Teacher317]

just because they couldn’t get the story and speak to her or find the person that we found, who remembered it from back then, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”

And that's sufficient to declare guilt for Liberals today. Amazing.

[EEGator]

I'm disappointed...

[bgill]

Fox and Friends this morning said she couldn’t name the penis until after lawyers had at her for 6 days.

[Eleutheria5]

He hasn't proven himself innocent beyond a reasonable doubt, though. GUILTY! Walk the plank, you scurvy swab!



Aborting babies is the only way to save them from public school.

[scottinoc]

With all due respect to the New York Times, which is the best paper in America

Stopped reading there, but I enjoyed the first couple of paragraphs.

[HollyB]

Time to start suing for slander and libel.

[kiryandil]

Freepers: “We’re Not Sure If The Story About Jane Mayer Fellating Syph-ridden Lepers Is True, Or Not”

[Lockbox]

I wonder if all Condé Nast magazines (owner of the New Yorker) lie about their advertisers’ products the same as they did about Brett? Maybe it’s time to call the advertisers and ask why should I buy your product since we know that the New Yorker lies in their stories and I am concerned maybe also in the ads.

[bgill]

She wasn’t sure until the demonrats got hold of her.

I’m sure she’s a liar.

[freeandfreezing]

...denying that the assault ever took place

The most astonishing thing about Ms. Ramirez's story is that, if any of it occurred, she is the perpetrator and the person, if any, who chose to expose themselves at the party is the victim. As crude as it might be, among adults at a party someone exposing themselves is not a crime. But Ms. Ramirez stated that she touched the genitals of the person who was nude. That act is a sexual assault, unless the person she touched consented to the contact.

[RoosterRedux]

Hey, Debbie, is this the guy?

[Intolerant in NJ]

Jane Mayer: Accuser Told Ronan Farrow She Wasn’t Sure of Story...close enough for government work....

[A Navy Vet]

"Jane Mayer said on Monday that Deborah Ramirez, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually harassing her, told her New Yorker colleague Ronan Farrow that she couldn’t be sure of the Supreme Court nominee’s guilt."

Okay. Deborah Ramirez can't be sure and the new player, Jane Mayer, can't be sure - and of course Dr. Ford can't be sure.

Bottom line: All these accusations are made by women who "can't be sure". Well, I'm can't be sure I smoked some pot in 1974 before joining the Navy when it was still illegal. But it could be possible if proven by a grudge witness.

More importantly, as teenager in the 60's, I remember being in some bed at some time (sound familiar?) making out with a girl. I think I may have touched her breast (not sure), but definitely remember her enjoying me "dry-humping" (clothes on) her crotch. She didn't want to go farther so we got up and joined the group. It's what teenagers did in those days.

These girls/women are not innocent.