Vote now whether you have the votes or not. Barrett is waiting in the wings and can be confirmed in a matter of weeks.
No more pussyfooting around!
“Vote now whether you have the votes or not”
Bingo. Mitch should bring it to a vote on the senate floor ASAP.
Grassley failed. He should never have accommodated Ford without concrete evidence of wrongdoing. Now there will be a lineup of bimbos requesting their own hearings based on vague remembrances.
it’s only your guess Barrett can be confirmed in a matter of weeks. It’s likely the Dems would find stall tactics of problems to create about her delaying any possible confirmation of her too.
Ha, ha. If feminists stop the freak show right now and make like a carpet for Judge Kavanaugh, maybe the President won’t appoint someone like Oliver Cromwell next.
;-D
They obviously don’t have the votes.
That would appear to make the most sense, if the Senate has the authority and the votes to affirm the nominee notwithstanding a committee vote against the nominee.
If that is the case, then the R's are presently looking the wrong way through the telescope and should do as you recommend.
If that is not the case, and we conduct what amounts to a tactical retreat, then the left will simply carry on its attack with Amy Barrett or any other judicial nominee (Finestein already has practice v Barrett). It would seem better in such case to stand where we are and fight to expose the left's duplicity.
>>Vote now whether you have the votes or not. Barrett is waiting in the wings and can be confirmed in a matter of weeks.<<
Isn’t Barrett the chick who chose to signal her liberal credentials by adopting a couple of Haitian kids?