At whose house did this “incident” supposedly take place?
I know Ms. Ford doesn’t remember, but it stands to reason that it didn’t take place at the homes of any of the four witnesses, right?
I’m wondering if we are missing a piece of her story. I mean, she’s not claiming that they were at a home where none of the owners/occupants were present, is she?
The Scalia clerk’s story makes the most sense—even if he did backpeddle. The owner was present—not Kavanaugh.
Interesting point. I'm guessing she's going to say she doesn't know whose house it was because she had been invited to a stranger's houseparty but went with several people she knew.
The Scalia clerk is Ed Whelan. He didn’t backpedal at all. He simply apolpgized for bringing Garrett’s name into the story. I think that was all deliberate — and Garrett is cooperating with Whelan.
Whelan didn't backpeddle. The apology was for the people he mentioned in his threads, that he didn't mean to make their names public.
But his theory stands.
It was quite plausible, if the assault part of her story actually happened, and I have yet to hear Mr. Garrett deny any of it; however, he is on Kavanaugh's character witness list.
http://www.ibtimes.com/chris-garrett-who-ed-whelan-named-arbitrarily-was-among-kavanaughs-character-2718835
It seems highly unlikely that a resident son or daughter wasn't in the house. At this point, it seems even more unlikely that any of this happened at all.
Maybe she was assaulted by someone else. Since she doesn’t know when or where the party was, it is impossible to investigate.
I’m wondering if we are missing a piece of her story. I mean, she’s not claiming that they were at a home where none of the owners/occupants were present, is she?
Lots of high school kids party at homes with no parents present, but I have never heard of kids going to a house where the teen who lives at the home was not present!!
? I mean why would a kid give permission to others to party at his empty house?
Wouldn’t that be breaking and entering??
Did you read the theory by Ed Whelan? Look it up. He gives the name.
SUPPOSEDLY, she had a bathing suit on, so it would seem that the house would have a pool!
You're missing a few marbles if you think any of this matters to any US Senator who will be voting on the nomination.
There is zero legitimacy to her story. We’ve been getting told these kids ran in the same circles and that these girls were best friends. This female friend doesn’t just deny this party, she denies ever knowing Kavenaugh at all.
That’s odd.
At this point, Ford’s nut to go under oath.
That means she will back out on Thursday and attempt another renegotiation.
She and her handlers want a story that says white males refused to sit down with her.
They forget how many women are mothers of sons