Posted on 09/22/2018 9:35:20 AM PDT by Mariner
In this segment (starting at the 20:00min mark), Gregg Jarrett says the State of Maryland has no Statute of Limitations on sexual assault.
And that Ford should pursue her quest for "justice" with the State of Maryland.
Not the political theater of the Senate committee.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
It is assault when Juliet (15)'s parents find out Romeo, (17) has been getting it on with Jules. In a vast majority of these cases, the "crimes" are reported by the "our darling precious daughter) parents. And, in most of THOSE cases, there is strong animus between her parents and the boyfriend.
Quote me back where I said there was an accusation of rape against Judge Kavanaugh.
This is what I was afraid of for Judge Kavanaugh. That he may be facing a criminal trial instead of sitting on the Supreme Court. These laws are so unbelievably awful. A man (or woman) can be convicted and sent to prison for life based on nothing but unsubstantiated hearsay and the vaguest of circumstantial evidence. You people have no idea how EVIL these laws are! Recovered memory therapy needs to be criminalized, there needs to be a sharply limited statute of limitations in every state!
No statue of limitations... Gee... isn’t that just ... SO convenient now...?
Gotta hand it to the Dims... when they make up a story, they cover all the bases, don’t they.
Your #3 post sure sounds like it to some of us: “How exactly do you prove rape 50-60 years on?”
In Maryland, the criminal statute of limitations varies depending on the severity of the offense. The criminal statutes of limitations include:
Felony sexual offenses: no statute of limitations, and
Misdemeanor offenses: one year from the event.
Nope, way past the limit. Doubt it would have gotten to a misdemeanor offense since, according to the as yet no fully presented letter, no genitals or boobs were involved. Not even a stolen kiss. Not physical marks or bruises. No ripped or disheveled clothing. It was a non-event.
I agree - no testimony unless she files charges.
If they are dumb enough to let this happen , then this has to be the first line of questioning.
When did you first remember the assault? What did you do next? After you contacted the Senator and lawyers on this matter, why did you decide not to press charges? Will you sign a complaint right now - County sheriff steps forward with documents to sign...
#metoo
Next SCOTUS nominee will be a WOMAN! Very difficult to accuse a woman of rape.
....unless it’s a teacher!
“Whats the statute of limitations on going to second base?”
From what we’ve been told, it didn’t get to second base (touching boobs). Didn’t get to first (kiss), either.
“activity between juveniles less than 2 years apart.”
Today, age of consent is 16. Maryland, if it happened there, today has no Romeo and Juliet law. Notice she’s smart enough to go with 15 and not 16.
Get a load of this: WaPo is now saying it happened 37 years ago which makes her 14 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/christine-blasey-ford-wanted-to-flee-the-us-to-avoid-brett-kavanaugh-now-she-may-testify-against-him/2018/09/22/db942340-bdb1-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ec94bf9d6310 Just wait until next week and she’s an 8 year old in a frilly Sunday dress with white Mary Janes.
Oh, you better believe she’ll have been coached with very vivid detailed triple X rated remembrances come next week including a public hair on her beer bottle but sadly, the saved swimsuit with the DNA evidence was destroyed in a globull warming event caused by Trump.
She claims she doesn’t fly. If she left right now, it’d be pushing the speed limits and dangerous to others on the road to drive the 3000 miles to DC by Monday morning.
And that was my question: if Maryland doesn’t have a SOL on this, how the hell do you prove rape after 50 years? Just because you have conflated that into my writing that Judge Kavanaugh was accused of rape, doesn’t mean I wrote that.
If what Ford says is true (and everyone knows it’s BS), Kavanaugh would be guilty of Third Degree Sexual Assault...
2010 Maryland Code
CRIMINAL LAW
TITLE 3 - OTHER CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Subtitle 3 - Sexual Crimes
Section 3-307 - Sexual offense in the third degree.
§ 3-307. Sexual offense in the third degree.
(a) Prohibited.- A person may not:
(1) (i) engage in sexual contact with another without the consent of the other; and
(ii) 1. employ or display a dangerous weapon, or a physical object that the victim reasonably believes is a dangerous weapon;
2. suffocate, strangle, disfigure, or inflict serious physical injury on the victim or another in the course of committing the crime;
3. threaten, or place the victim in fear, that the victim, or an individual known to the victim, imminently will be subject to death, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement, serious physical injury, or kidnapping; or
4. commit the crime while aided and abetted by another;
(2) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual;
(3) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is under the age of 14 years, and the person performing the sexual contact is at least 4 years older than the victim;
(4) engage in a sexual act with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the sexual act is at least 21 years old; or
(5) engage in vaginal intercourse with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the act is at least 21 years old.
(b) Penalty.- A person who violates this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the third degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 10 years.
[An. Code 1957, art. 27, § 464B; 2002, ch. 26, § 2; 2006, ch. 317.]
The laws being posted are today's laws. What were they back in '82 or whenever this supposedly happened. Brett, PJ and Judge have all denied this happened. We're missing the 4th person she claims to have been there... wherever it might have been. She couldn't name #4 boy because then she'd have to identify the house and #4 boy would live there and he'd know for sure if that happened in his house. She told her husband and therapist there were 4 boys and her. She told Dianne and WaPo there were 4 boys and her. Suddenly, yesterday another girl was there. Wanna bet that's what Dianne said she had waiting in the wings to stop the nomination? We already know little miss innocent Chrissy was shopping her friends to find someone who'd back her story... after she said no one knew. Throw enough money out there and someone will bite.
That applies in criminal prosecutions. If she is sincere, she should file a criminal complaint.
Why didn’t she? because she has no concrete facts to tell law enforcement about this incident, and they will not prosecute.
She knows that. She just wants him to go away so she and other sluts can have their precious abortion.
LOL
Good point, but usually there is much evidence present in teacher-student affairs, such as text messages.
In Kav’s case, I have not seen any evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.