Obviously it was extraterrestrial porn.
Posted on 09/20/2018 6:30:49 PM PDT by blueyon
He was the janitor, for crying out loud. How much access could he have had to the network there? They haven’t arrested anyone else, so it looks like a porn ring wasn’t an issue. Something about this smells.
Either the FBI stepped in it in their execution, or they’re deploying good, old-fashioned smoke and mirrors to cover up a bigger situation. I don’t think it was aliens or solar flares, I think it might have been the Russkies or ChiComms hacking into our system for some cloak and dagger, and they may possibly have had someone working on the inside with them. The janitor did it with a candlestick in the server room.
Doesnt explain closing the post office or the six other buildings.
Its also an instant character assassination and they know no one runs to the defense of someone thy smear with it.
Too much other stuff for this fake charge to work.
To: blueyon
I thought they found a dirty bomb - a nuke.
6 posted on 9/20/2018, 7:42:45 PM by GreatRoad
Child porn from outer space?
No, I kid.
Seriously, it does seem like any time the Feds want to shut down a place or a person, there’s a child porn or pedophilia accusation.
Some freepers might disagree but I don’t think you need armed Blackhawks to find child porn and protect children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-P2lMBMdHE&t=1426s
at 11:30 the discussion goes to the closed down observatories around the world.
.
Because janitors have the passwords to the computers - NOT!
Exactly, it would take all of half an hour, not 11 days, to take whatever computer might be hooked up in the cleaning supply storeroom and handcuff him.
I’m glad I’m not the only one to think that this is the most bogus ‘explanation’ yet.
The “The alien mothership is coming around the sun and we don’t want the peasants to panic.” explanation is more believable.
That level of militaristic response, the only way that it would make sense is if the guy with child porn is also an Al Qaida bombmaker and had the whole little community wired.
I was listening to the radio show “Ground Zero” a little while ago....before I turned off the radio in disgust.
The host Clyde Lewis had Richard C. Hoagland on as a guest talking about the Sunspot Observatory. Hoagland doesn’t believe the child porn explanation (and neither do I).
But then Hoagland went on and on about how it’s a Constitutional right to download and view whatever you want, blah blah blah.
Child porn? I’m pretty sure it’s illegal on the federal level, as well as in every state and local jurisdiction across the country, as well it should be. I was shocked to hear Hoagland imply it was some sort of right to view ANYTHING you want on the Internet, including child porn. It sure as hell is NOT!
And then he went on, saying the FBI has the resources to investigate this alleged child porn in New Mexico, but not Kavanaugh! WTF? And later in the interview, he said that again about investigating Kavanaugh! Off went the radio. And eff you, Richard C. Hoagland.
Obviously it was extraterrestrial porn.
Child porn is a very good phony explanation for law enforcement cover-ups
Naturally, everyone is outraged by that, so its an excellent distraction. Its the sort of crime where no motive needs to be given, nor do methods of the crime need to be explained by the authorities. No evidence ever needs to be presented because, well, its disgusting and illegal to show it in public.
actually sexual issues was a tool used by leftists in the Soviets.
I am at the point that I don’t believe anything told to me about the government and sexual issues and accusations.
It can be used to distract from the truth.
Agreed. Its worrisome. The FBI must be losing its touch....
child porn as a cover?
Buahahahahahahahaaha! Unless Hillery and the Podesta brothers are involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.