Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pravious
I suspect the reason she hasn’t agreed to come (no pun intended) is that she doesn’t want to testify to the truth of her accusations under oath. If she doesn’t, they should call off this circus and have a vote on Thursday, as originally planned.

Testing under oath means nothing, zero, to these people. They don't believe in God, so swearing an oath to Him is just a bunch of nonsense words to them.

As far as worrying about being prosecuted for perjury, when has that ever happened to a liberal who lies in front of Congress?

31 posted on 09/18/2018 2:16:44 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom

If she falsely testifies that Judge assaulted her, she may have a serious problem with a civil lawsuit for defamation.


62 posted on 09/18/2018 2:34:02 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Tom
As far as worrying about being prosecuted for perjury, when has that ever happened to a liberal who lies in front of Congress?

Strategery at work here.

Kavanaugh hired a defamation attorney. A woman attorney.

If this accuser testifies under oath, examined by the attorney, it is likely the attorney will set her up for a civil defamation case, as well as making her look like an idiot.

Judge K just tells the truth and is surrounded by women who know his character.

86 posted on 09/18/2018 2:58:36 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson