Posted on 09/11/2018 6:44:24 AM PDT by Red Badger
If it’s the wild wild west in DC I’d sure like some conservative to ‘leak’ the Clinton Crime Family Investigations.
Good for the Goose... good for the gander...
Ain’t gonna happen...................A Pulitzer Prize isn’t worth dying for..................
They both love Hilliary..................
Pulitzer's aren't handed out for writings that back conservative thought or perception... for the writer it would be 'death without prize'...
Is this the same Strzok that the IG Report said was unbiased? How is that possible? I thought there was no bias in any of his actions?
You might want to look at the exact wording.
A guilty verdict for Sedition in this case is a slam-dunk.
“Conspire to leak? Seems like he was just begging for jail-time.”
Jail? I want to see the two of them condemned and hanged side by side.
And yet, neither of them will be indicted much less go to jail.
They will go scot-free, just like the criminal bitch Lois Lerner.
I don’t have the report — can you give me a hint of what you are referring to?
Maybe the IG didn’t have this latest evidence on Strzok because the emails were thought lost due to computer crash. I heard that story too. God knows who really knew.
The good guys have their phone records and all the evidence they need to convict the conspirators. They even know which reporters talked to which FBI and DOJ traitors.
bump
No way is that guy straight. Look at the mincing, he makes Richard Simmons come across as Rambo, this guy is a total 3 dollar bill which would also explain his Hillary worship.
"Wee Wee
Woo Woo
I did a
Poo Poo!"
Snake.
Andrew McCarthy has changed his posture from being very critical of the FBI and DOJ to defending them a little more. It is strange. Maybe they had a “talk” with him. The FBI knew this was a totally fake investigation, so leaking to the press had one purpose, to damage Trump.
The OIG did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that that improper considerations, including political bias, ..., this conclusion specifically states that, the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBIs work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation. In other words, the FBI and DOJ employees did not give him documents or testimony admitting their bias. Of course they didnt; those corrupt people were not going to sign their own indictment and admit their crimes.The OIG is not saying there wasnt bias, because this same paragraph clearly states that he believes their was bias.
Note the careful wording.
No one testified or documented that they were biased. There were actions which certainly gave the appearance of bias all over the place...jut no one testified or wrote of their own bias.
I see what you are saying regarding the admission of bias. The employees would not be admitting to any bias... and why would they. Thanks for making that clear and pointing to the careful wording.
I’m so surprised!
Now, what’s going to be done................nothing!
he makes me want to puke
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.