Posted on 09/07/2018 7:09:28 PM PDT by blueplum
Circuit Court Judge Jeff Harris this week ruled against University of Missouri law professor Royce Barondes, who challenged the schools rule prohibiting concealed guns on campus even if theyre locked in a personal car. {snip}
Barondes, who has worked at MU since 2002 and teaches a course on firearms law, sued the university in 2015, challenging its gun prohibition. He sought no monetary payment. {snip} But Wednesdays ruling only represents a partial victory for the university.
The judge also has been asked to consider whether the MU gun policy is constitutional, a completely different question than whether it violates state statute...
(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...
Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything.
JUST DO IT.
When I went to work at TxDOT that was the policy, no guns even in cars. I told the HR person briefing this that the only way they would know is if I tell them as they had no authority to search my vehicle without my consent.
Its not a completely different issue at all.
States have no power to nullify the constitution. They have powers that are not given to the fedgov, but they cannot take away a comstitutional right with a state law.
What? You want professors to carry concealed guns and place life of some crazed gunman who comes to practice shooting students? Come on all those killers had rough childhoods, and according to Pelosi they are just human beings, and must not be shot by some professor carrying a concealed gun. That would be depriving the crazy gunman of his civil rights. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law!! /S/S/S/S
Works for me!
Legally, black powder muzzleloaders are NOT firearms.
Sure you only have 2 shots, but they are shotgun blasts or a gawdawful 58 caliber heavy lead bullet in wadding. Either one is going to suck to be on the business end of.
Well, maybe fedlaw says that, but most or many states DO classify muzzleloaders or cap and ball gun as firearms. That is why the issue is now whether the UoM policy violates the 2A
Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and accessories typical to the normal function of such arms, in defense of his home, person, family and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned. The rights guaranteed by this section shall be unalienable. Any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny and the state of Missouri shall be obligated to uphold these rights and shall under no circumstances decline to protect against their infringement. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the general assembly from enacting general laws which limit the rights of convicted violent felons or those adjudicated by a court to be a danger to self or others as result of a mental disorder or mental infirmity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.